Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for October, 2012

Scanned Retina - A Resource for the People!

Converting the Print Media:

Congratulations are in order for a dynamic and intrepid team of American’s exercising their responsibilities to rein in a corrupt government.

The Clayton County Citizen’s Oversight Committee.  (CCCOC)

Download and print.  Distribute locally.
Citizens at a boil

Spread the word!
http://scannedretina.wordpress.com/2012/08/25/it-is-the-cafrs-stupid/

 BETTER

Download and print.  Distribute locally.
Subpoenaed

Spread the word!
http://scannedretina.wordpress.com/2012/08/25/it-is-the-cafrs-stupid/

 BEST

Download and print.  Distribute locally.
Governed own the Government

View original post

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

ImageImage

 

 Sun.7Oct2012

VOTE YES MARRIAGE_PHOTO ID AND NO TO LEVY

Humble Thanks to Dear candidate,Your Star Tribune voter’s guide profile has been posted to www.startribune.com SharonAnderson MNSenate64

ISSUES OF JUDICIAL CORRUPTION_ACCESS _DUE PROCESS

http://elections.startribune.com/profiles/49597.html Sharons Blog,WebSite’s www.sharonsenate64.blogspot.com other www.taxthemax.blogspot.com

LATELY SHARON IS SHOCKED HOW MANY GAY AND LESBIANS IN

GOVERMENT www.lufsky.blogspot.com

www.constution.org Jon Roland
 
 
MN PRESS RELEASE: FILMING OF #LAWLESSAMERICA – THE MOVE COMES TO MINNESOTA
Don Mashak
Rt 1 Box 231
Albertville MN 55301
612-326-6070
 

Magner v. Gallagher

 
Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
10-1032 8th Cir. Not Argued Feb 14, 2012 N/A N/A OT 2011
 

Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C. serves as counsel to the respondents in this case.

Issue: (1) Whether disparate impact claims are cognizable under the Fair Housing Act; and, if so (2) what test should be used to analyze them.

Plain English Issue: (1) Whether a lawsuit can be brought for a violation of the Fair Housing Act based on a practice that is not discriminatory on its own, but has a discriminatory effect; and, if so, (2) how should courts determine whether a practice has a discriminatory effect and violates the Act?

Judgment: Dismissed – Rule 14 on February 14, 2012.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Briefs and Documents

Merits Briefs for the Petitioners

Amicus Briefs in Support of the Petitioners

Amicus Briefs in Support of Neither Party

Merits Briefs for the Respondents

Amicus Briefs in Support of the Respondents

 

Certiorari-stage documents

Read Full Post »

%d bloggers like this: