Feeds:
Posts
Comments

How Elena Kagan helped “Queer” Harvard Law School.

 2010 LWV Minnesota Education Fund
Voter Guide
Attorney General  http://www.legalnewsline.com/


RETURN BY FRIDAY, July 2, 2010
RESPONSES SHOULD BE EMAILED TO:
ALLIE MOEN, Program Director, {HYPERLINK “
mailto:amoen@lwvmn.org“}
Phone: 651-224-5445 (office)
Responses can be mailed to:
Allie Moen, Program Director
500 Rice St.
St. Paul, MN 55103
AFFIDAVIT OF SHARON ANDERSON Republican MN_ AG
 1. Candidate: Sharon Anderson aka Peterson_Scarrella 4 Title Searc

 
2. Party:Republican
3. City:  St. Paul MN, Born Mora,Titles Aitkin,Itasca Co’s
4. Occupation: Retired Entreprenuer_Political Advocate_Whistleblower_Blogger
 

5. Campaign: Legal Residence 1058 Summit/PO Box 4384,St.Paul,MN.55104-0384
651-776-5835 Fax out only
6. Campaign website’s: www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com 
 
 
7. General information email address
Sharon4Anderson@aol.com
8. Education: St.Paul Central,Self Taught,School Hard Knocks
Attorney Pro Se,PrivateAG_QuiTam,Entreprenuer_Realestate.
Attorney General
2010 RACE QUESTIONS
1. Why are you seeking the position of Attorney General?
  
TOUGH LOVE SHARON:Strict Constructionist, advocate’s  educate , promote transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law. 
  
Current DFL-AG has failed to Defend Statutes, re: ROW,Excessive Consumption,Illegal Taxes by Theft,Trespass,Treason, We must  downsize 87 Co. Attorney’s re: www.mnccc.org
Sharon is a QuiTam_Whistleblower re: Health Care,Housing,Taxes,Election
  
  
ABOLISH JUDICIAL IMMUNITY, Judges who “take” our Homes,Health Care without “Just Compensation or Quiet Titles,  via Unpublished Opinions,must Resign,   www.sharon4judge.blogspot.com
 
RESTORE THE CONSTITUTION: high standards of ethics and morality in private and  public life ,  to ensure that political and judicial officials do not abuse the powers entrusted to them by the American people. 
 
SEPARATION OF POWERS: White Collar Corruption, via  litigation, investigations through Internet site’s where many of the open records ,public outreach.
documents, legal filings, an other educational materials are made available to the public and media. This educational effort, which includes direct mailings to millions of Americans, educates the public about operations of government and the judiciary and increases public awareness if corruption and misconduct exists. ,
 
 
 
2. Please describe the top three policy areas on which you would
primarily focus.  HEALTH,HOUSING,HEALING
Current DFL AG has refused to defend or debate Obama’s Health Care.
Outsourcing medical files to France, puts MN at risk, must be abated.
 
Award: Compensation to Alice Krengel:and others, Housing http://www.angelfire.com/mn3/advocate7/alice2006/alice.html
 
Secret Commitment Court run by Lesbian Judge
 
3. How do you see your role as the consumer protection
advocate?  AG’s Office ,Executive Branch ie: Paren Patrie
God helps those who help themselves,
 
4. How will you prioritize your responsibilities to state
government, local governments and individuals
Eliminate 87 County Attorneys City Attorneys
Have 10 District Attorneys for Speedy Justice Act,
Out Source the  Agencies,Boards to
persons of interest.
TAKE THE CONTROL OF THE FRANCHISE OF LAWYERS AWAY.
 
 Sharon Anderson
Candidate for Attorney General
1058 Summit Ave/PO Box 4384St. Paul, MN 55106
Dear Ms. Anderson,
League of Women Voters Minnesota Education Fund (LWV Minnesota)
congratulates you on your run for office. LWV Minnesota Voter Guide is the
source for non-partisan information on Minnesota’s candidates for elected office.
In partnership with Target Corporation, the LWV Minnesota Voter Guide
provides the public and media with insight into candidates’ positions and views
on a variety of issues. Your participation is essential and appreciated.

2010. The Voter Guide will be available in all 72 Target Stores across Minnesota.
Additionally, our local LWVs distribute copies to libraries, community centers,
and universities statewide.
The deadline for submission is Friday, July 2, 2010.
INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATES:
• Return your completed questionnaire no later than the end of
business on Friday, July 2, 2010..
CO-PRESIDENTS
Vivian Jenkins Nelsen
Judy Stuthman
EDUCATION FUND ADVISORS
Sharon Sayles Belton
VP Community Relations
GMAC ResCap
Bill K. Erickson
Senior Vice President, Retired
Medtronic, Inc.
Barbara Forster
Retired
Robert Giere
Director
Alumni Philanthropy
Mayo Clinic
Archie Givens
President
Givens Foundation for
African American Literature
Josie R. Johnson
President
Josie R. Johnson & Associates
Peggy Lucas
Partner
Brighton Development Corp.
Yusef Mgeni
Director
Office of Educational Equity
Saint Paul Public Schools
Brock D. Nelson
CEO
Regions Hospital
Marsha A. Shotley
Vice President
Board and Community Relations
Blue Cross and Blue Shield
of Minnesota
Laura Waterman Wittstock
President and CEO
Wittstock & Associates
CO-PRESIDENTS
Vivian Jenkins Nelsen
Judy Stuthman
EDUCATION FUND ADVISORS
Sharon Sayles Belton
VP Community Relations
GMAC ResCap
Bill K. Erickson
Senior Vice President, Retired
Medtronic, Inc.
Barbara Forster
Retired
Robert Giere
Director
Alumni Philanthropy
Mayo Clinic
Archie Givens
President
Givens Foundation for
African American Literature
Josie R. Johnson
President
Josie R. Johnson & Associates
Peggy Lucas
Partner
Brighton Development Corp.
Yusef Mgeni
Director
Office of Educational Equity
Saint Paul Public Schools
Brock D. Nelson
CEO
Regions Hospital
Marsha A. Shotley
Vice President
Board and Community Relations
Blue Cross and Blue Shield
of Minnesota
Laura Waterman Wittstock
President and CEO
Wittstock & Associates
PUBLICATION POLICES:
• Candidates who do not respond by the deadline will have their
names listed, followed by “No responses were received.”
• Candidates must adhere to the word limit on each question.
Answers that exceed the word limit will be cut at the word limit.
The word limit for each question is listed in the attached
questionnaire.
• League of Women Voters Minnesota Education Fund will not edit
responses for grammar, punctuation or content. Answers will be
printed exactly as received. Responses which contain profanity,
vulgarity or personal attacks on other candidates will not be
printed.
For all questions or concerns regarding the Voter Guide, please contact LWV
Minnesota Program Director, Allie Moen, via electronic mail at
amoen@lwvmn.org or LWV Minnesota Program Assistant, Sandy’Ci Moua via
email at
smoua@lwvmn.org. They both can be reached by phone at 651-224-
5445 (office).
We thank you in advance for your participation.
Sincerely,
Geri Nelson Zandy Zwiebel
Voter Service Committee Co-Chairs
Copyright 2006 Star Tribune. All rights reserved.
Feedback | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Member Center | Company Site | Company Directory & Contacts | Company
Jobs | Advertising Information | Newspaper Subscriptions & Service | eEdition | Classroom Newspapers
425 Portland Av. S., Minneapolis, MN 55488 (612) 673-4000
Candidate Profile
Published Wednesday, September 13 08:30:26 AM
Name: Sharon Anderson
Office: Minnesota Attorney general
Party: Republican
Incumbent: No
City of residence: St Paul—Aitkin—Nashwauk
Website:
http://www.sharonanderson.org
Background:
Title 31 Whistleblower, re: Scarrella for Associate Justice 221NW2d562; 1994 Independent Republican
nominee for attorney general; VA widow, political activist; ECF P165913; Pacer sa 1299;
www.msnusers.com/AndersonAdvocates web sites educational, real estate entrepreneur; holdings St.
Paul, Aitkin, Nashwauk, Gull Lake? Peterson Heritage, Mora, Minn.; Chergosky Heritage Minneapolis.
Endorsements:
Not seeking endorsements.
Essay:
Enforce Art. III Minnesota Constitution separation of powers, MS8.06; advocate high standards, ethics,
morality, health care, access, eminent domain compensation. Prosecute violations of case fixing, election
fraud, that has repealed the MS2.724. Case A061150. WaterEDemA06-1150. Integrity, public trust,
eliminate unpublished opinions, 87 county attorneys, replace 10 district attorneys, enforcement MS8.32-3
Consumers Affairs, parens patriae, jury trials;
www.judicialwatch.org; www.sharon4anderson.org;
prosecute white collar crime unabated by the monopoly of franchised lawyers — judges acting in concert
with their franchise.
Candidate profile Page 1 of 1
http://mpls.startribune.com/news/metro/elections/profiles/26222.html 6/28/2010
 

 

 

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299
telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Candidate AG2010 www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com Blogger:

 

http://www.restoretheconstitution.ning.com/profile/SharonScarrellaAndersonThanks to Jeff: Change Photo

 

 Welcome, Sharon Scarrella Anderson!

Sharon Scarre…

Please Restore Constitution before its to late,MN Vote Separation Powers Art.III www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com to Abolish Judicial Immunity 4 our Due Process www.taxthemax.blogspot.com

Members on Restore the Constitution:

Judy Lyford Judy Lyford Kathleen Serr… Kathleen Serra Perry Gwendolyn Pra Gwendolyn Pra hoodoo- AKA F… hoodoo- AKA Fred B. Houck Doug Badger Doug Badger
About Restore the Constitution
Nation-wide effort serving notice on government officials to fulfill their oath to the US Constitution.
Restore the Constitution 904 members
359 photos
42 songs
103 videos
266 discussions
18 Events
347 blog posts
 
To control which emails you receive on Restore the Constitution, click here

Go to www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com 

MNSupremeCourtA100064

Help Help
  Information   
 

 

 
Case View
ORCA Info

 

Case Information
Case Number: A100064 Filing Date: 01/12/2010    
Jurisdiction: Both Status: Closed      
ORCA: Civil Division Ramsey County District Court Hearing Type: Oral      
Classification: Standard – Civil – Other
Short Title: Deanna Brayton, et al., Respondents, vs. Tim Pawlenty, et al., Appellants    
Full Title: Deanna Brayton, Darlene Bullock, Forough Mahabady, Debra Branley, Marlene Griffin and Evelyn Bernhagen on behalf of themselves and all others similiarly situated, Respondents, vs. Tim Pawlenty, Governor of the State of Minnesota, et al., Appellants    
Summary:  
Citation: *      
PFR Information
Filing Date: 01/12/2010 Status: Briefing  
Short Title: Deanna Brayton, et al., Respondents, vs. Tim Pawlenty, et al., Appellants Hearing Type: Oral Expedited
     

+ Display Party Information

Docketing Filter View
Display:  ChronologicalThreaded  
Docket Information
Document Description Jurisdiction Filing Date Docket Entry Type Filing Type Status
Brief – Amicus; League of Women Voters Minnesota, et al Supreme Court 02/23/2010 Brief Amicus Final
Brief – Amicus; Minnesota House of Representatives Supreme Court 02/23/2010 Brief Amicus Final
Affidavit – Service for motion to proceed in forma pauperis Supreme Court 02/23/2010 Affidavit Service Final
Brief – Amicus; League of Minn Cities, et al Supreme Court 02/23/2010 Brief Amicus Final
Order – Grant IFP Supreme Court 02/17/2010 Order Grant IFP Final
Received original motion to proceed in forma pauperis Supreme Court 02/17/2010 Correspondence Incoming Final
Motion – In Forma Pauperis Supreme Court 02/17/2010 Motion In Forma Pauperis Final
Affidavit – Service for motion from the City of Minneapolis Supreme Court 02/12/2010 Affidavit Service Final
Received corrected cover to amicus brief Supreme Court 02/10/2010 Correspondence Incoming Final
Transcript – Delivery Certificate – Vanessa Melstrom Supreme Court 02/10/2010 Transcript Delivery Certificate Final
Event – Orig. Court/Agency Files/Exhibits Received -H2- Supreme Court 02/10/2010 Event Orig. Court/Agency Files/Exhibits Received Final
Brief – Appellant Supreme Court 02/09/2010 Brief Appellant Final
Letter confirming that the City of St. Paul intends to file a joint brief. Supreme Court 02/09/2010 Correspondence Incoming Final
Brief – Amicus; Professors of Constitution Law and Separation of Powers Supreme Court 02/09/2010 Brief Amicus Final
Brief – Amicus; Tom Emmer, et al Supreme Court 02/09/2010 Brief Amicus Final
Order – Grant Amicus to Coalition of Greater Minnesota Cities, Metro Cities and Minnesota Association of Small Cities. May file joint amicus brief in support of respondent. Supreme Court 02/09/2010 Order Grant Amicus Final
Order – Grant motion of Professor Paulsen to join in the amicus brief of Professors Stras and Scott. Supreme Court 02/09/2010 Order Grant Final
Received original motion of Professor Paulsen to particiapate amicus curiae. Supreme Court 02/09/2010 Correspondence Incoming Final
Notice – Request Trial Court/Agency File Supreme Court 02/09/2010 Notice Request Trial Court/Agency File Final
Motion – Amicus – Professor Michael Stokes Paulsen Supreme Court 02/08/2010 Motion Amicus – Leave to File Motion Final
Letter from League of Minnesota Cities with email address Supreme Court 02/05/2010 Correspondence Incoming Final
Response – Motion to revised request to particiate amicus curiae of Tom Emmer, et al. Supreme Court 02/05/2010 Response Motion Final
Motion – Request for Leave to File a Joint Brief as Amici Curiae from City of Minneapolis Supreme Court 02/05/2010 Motion Other Final
Motion – Request for Leave to File a Joint Brief as Amici Curiae Supreme Court 02/04/2010 Motion Other Final
Order – Grant Amicus Supreme Court 02/03/2010 Order Grant Amicus Final
Response – Motion for Amicus Supreme Court 02/03/2010 Response Motion Final
Letter correspondence from counsel for Amici Chapter of Common Cause and League of Women Voters giving her fax number and email address Supreme Court 02/03/2010 Correspondence Incoming Final
Affidavit – Service for motion of Minnesota Chapter of Common Cause and the League of Women Voters Minnesota Supreme Court 02/03/2010 Affidavit Service Final
Corrected Motion – Amicus – Leave to File Motion (Tom Emmer, et al.) Supreme Court 02/02/2010 Correspondence Incoming Final
Motion – Amicus – Leave to File Motion (Tom Emmer, et al.) Supreme Court 02/02/2010 Motion Amicus – Leave to File Motion Final
Letter from Appellant’s informing the court that they have no objection to the motions of the City of Minneapolis, Minnesota House of Representatives, Minnesota Chapter of Common Cause and the League of Women Voters Minnesota to participate amicus curiae Supreme Court 01/28/2010 Correspondence Incoming Final
Received original motion to participate amicus curiae of Minnesota House of Representatives Supreme Court 01/28/2010 Correspondence Incoming Final
Received original response to motion Supreme Court 01/28/2010 Correspondence Incoming Final
Order – Grant Amicus. Deny motion of Minnesota House of Representatives to participate in oral argument Supreme Court 01/28/2010 Order Grant Amicus Final
Letter from Respondents attorney informing the court that they have no objections to the motions to participate amicus of City of Minneapolis, MN House of Representatives, MN Chapter of Common Cause and the League of Women Voters Minnesota, League of Minnesota Cities and City of St. Paul Supreme Court 01/28/2010 Correspondence Incoming Final
Motion – Amicus – City of Minneapolis Supreme Court 01/27/2010 Motion Amicus – Leave to File Motion Final
Response – Motion and request for extension of time to file brief should the court grant leave to participate amicus. Supreme Court 01/27/2010 Response Motion Final
Motion – Amicus – Minnesota House of Representatives Supreme Court 01/27/2010 Motion Amicus – Leave to File Motion Final
Motion – Amicus – Minnesota Chapter of Common Cause and the League of Women Voters Minnesota Supreme Court 01/27/2010 Motion Amicus – Leave to File Motion Final
Event – Oral En Banc – scheduled Supreme Court 01/27/2010 Event Oral En Banc – scheduled Final
Received original motion to participate amicus curiae of Professors David Stras and Ryan Scott Supreme Court 01/27/2010 Correspondence Incoming Final
Letter from Appellant’s attorney; they have no objection to the request to file amicus briefs from League of Minnesota Cities and Professors David Stras and Ryan Scott Supreme Court 01/26/2010 Correspondence Incoming Final
Motion – Amicus – Professors David Stras and Ryan Scott Supreme Court 01/26/2010 Motion Amicus – Leave to File Motion Final
Motion – Amicus – League of Minnesota Cities Supreme Court 01/26/2010 Motion Amicus – Leave to File Motion Final
Letter from Appellant’s attorney; they have no objection to the City of St. Paul’s motion to proceed amicus curiae. They request the City’s brief to be filed not later than the Respondent’s brief. Court of Appeals 01/25/2010 Correspondence Incoming Final
Letter from respondent’s attorney informing the court of their email addresses. Supreme Court 01/25/2010 Correspondence Incoming Final
Motion – Amicus – City of St. Paul Supreme Court 01/25/2010 Motion Amicus – Leave to File Motion Final
Letter from appellant’s attorney’s informing the court of their email addresses. Supreme Court 01/21/2010 Correspondence Incoming Final
Order – PAR – Grant Supreme Court 01/19/2010 Order PFR – Grant Final
Notice – Case Filing Court of Appeals 01/13/2010 Notice Case Filing Final
Motion – Expedite Court of Appeals 01/12/2010 Motion Expedite Final
Motion – Expedite review of appeal in the Supreme Court if the petition for accelerated review is granted. Supreme Court 01/12/2010 Motion Expedite Final
Motion – Expedite Consideration of Petition for Accelerated Review Supreme Court 01/12/2010 Motion Expedite Final
Petition – Accelerated Review Supreme Court 01/12/2010 Petition Accelerated Review Final
Statement – Case – Appellant Court of Appeals 01/12/2010 Statement Case – Appellant Final
Notice – Appeal – Case Filed; Judgment 1/8/10 Court of Appeals 01/12/2010 Notice Appeal – Case Filed Final
Number: A100064 Filing Date: 01/12/2010    
Jurisdiction: Both Status: Closed      
ORCA: Civil Division Ramsey County District Court Hearing Type: Oral      
Classification: Standard – Civil – Other
Short Title: Deanna Brayton, et al., Respondents, vs. Tim Pawlenty, et al., Appellants    
Full Title: Deanna Brayton, Darlene Bullock, Forough Mahabady, Debra Branley, Marlene Griffin and Evelyn Bernhagen on behalf of themselves and all others similiarly situated, Respondents, vs. Tim Pawlenty, Governor of the State of Minnesota, et al., Appellants    
Summary:  
Citation: *      
PFR Information
Filing Date: 01/12/2010 Status: Briefing  
Short Title: Deanna Brayton, et al., Respondents, vs. Tim Pawlenty, et al., Appellants Hearing Type: Oral Expedited
     

+ Display Party Information

Docketing Filter View
Display:  ChronologicalThreaded  
Docket Information
Document Description Jurisdiction Filing Date Docket Entry Type Filing Type Status
Brief – Amicus; League of Women Voters Minnesota, et al Supreme Court 02/23/2010 Brief Amicus Final
Brief – Amicus; Minnesota House of Representatives Supreme Court 02/23/2010 Brief Amicus Final
Affidavit – Service for motion to proceed in forma pauperis Supreme Court 02/23/2010 Affidavit Service Final
Brief – Amicus; League of Minn Cities, et al Supreme Court 02/23/2010 Brief Amicus Final
Order – Grant IFP Supreme Court 02/17/2010 Order Grant IFP Final
Received original motion to proceed in forma pauperis Supreme Court 02/17/2010 Correspondence Incoming Final
Motion – In Forma Pauperis Supreme Court 02/17/2010 Motion In Forma Pauperis Final
Affidavit – Service for motion from the City of Minneapolis Supreme Court 02/12/2010 Affidavit Service Final
Received corrected cover to amicus brief Supreme Court 02/10/2010 Correspondence Incoming Final
Transcript – Delivery Certificate – Vanessa Melstrom Supreme Court 02/10/2010 Transcript Delivery Certificate Final
Event – Orig. Court/Agency Files/Exhibits Received -H2- Supreme Court 02/10/2010 Event Orig. Court/Agency Files/Exhibits Received Final
Brief – Appellant Supreme Court 02/09/2010 Brief Appellant Final
Letter confirming that the City of St. Paul intends to file a joint brief. Supreme Court 02/09/2010 Correspondence Incoming Final
Brief – Amicus; Professors of Constitution Law and Separation of Powers Supreme Court 02/09/2010 Brief Amicus Final
Brief – Amicus; Tom Emmer, et al Supreme Court 02/09/2010 Brief Amicus Final
Order – Grant Amicus to Coalition of Greater Minnesota Cities, Metro Cities and Minnesota Association of Small Cities. May file joint amicus brief in support of respondent. Supreme Court 02/09/2010 Order Grant Amicus Final
Order – Grant motion of Professor Paulsen to join in the amicus brief of Professors Stras and Scott. Supreme Court 02/09/2010 Order Grant Final
Received original motion of Professor Paulsen to particiapate amicus curiae. Supreme Court 02/09/2010 Correspondence Incoming Final
Notice – Request Trial Court/Agency File Supreme Court 02/09/2010 Notice Request Trial Court/Agency File Final
Motion – Amicus – Professor Michael Stokes Paulsen Supreme Court 02/08/2010 Motion Amicus – Leave to File Motion Final
Letter from League of Minnesota Cities with email address Supreme Court 02/05/2010 Correspondence Incoming Final
Response – Motion to revised request to particiate amicus curiae of Tom Emmer, et al. Supreme Court 02/05/2010 Response Motion Final
Motion – Request for Leave to File a Joint Brief as Amici Curiae from City of Minneapolis Supreme Court 02/05/2010 Motion Other Final
Motion – Request for Leave to File a Joint Brief as Amici Curiae Supreme Court 02/04/2010 Motion Other Final
Order – Grant Amicus Supreme Court 02/03/2010 Order Grant Amicus Final
Response – Motion for Amicus Supreme Court 02/03/2010 Response Motion Final
Letter correspondence from counsel for Amici Chapter of Common Cause and League of Women Voters giving her fax number and email address Supreme Court 02/03/2010 Correspondence Incoming Final
Affidavit – Service for motion of Minnesota Chapter of Common Cause and the League of Women Voters Minnesota Supreme Court 02/03/2010 Affidavit Service Final
Corrected Motion – Amicus – Leave to File Motion (Tom Emmer, et al.) Supreme Court 02/02/2010 Correspondence Incoming Final
Motion – Amicus – Leave to File Motion (Tom Emmer, et al.) Supreme Court 02/02/2010 Motion Amicus – Leave to File Motion Final
Letter from Appellant’s informing the court that they have no objection to the motions of the City of Minneapolis, Minnesota House of Representatives, Minnesota Chapter of Common Cause and the League of Women Voters Minnesota to participate amicus curiae Supreme Court 01/28/2010 Correspondence Incoming Final
Received original motion to participate amicus curiae of Minnesota House of Representatives Supreme Court 01/28/2010 Correspondence Incoming Final
Received original response to motion Supreme Court 01/28/2010 Correspondence Incoming Final
Order – Grant Amicus. Deny motion of Minnesota House of Representatives to participate in oral argument Supreme Court 01/28/2010 Order Grant Amicus Final
Letter from Respondents attorney informing the court that they have no objections to the motions to participate amicus of City of Minneapolis, MN House of Representatives, MN Chapter of Common Cause and the League of Women Voters Minnesota, League of Minnesota Cities and City of St. Paul Supreme Court 01/28/2010 Correspondence Incoming Final
Motion – Amicus – City of Minneapolis Supreme Court 01/27/2010 Motion Amicus – Leave to File Motion Final
Response – Motion and request for extension of time to file brief should the court grant leave to participate amicus. Supreme Court 01/27/2010 Response Motion Final
Motion – Amicus – Minnesota House of Representatives Supreme Court 01/27/2010 Motion Amicus – Leave to File Motion Final
Motion – Amicus – Minnesota Chapter of Common Cause and the League of Women Voters Minnesota Supreme Court 01/27/2010 Motion Amicus – Leave to File Motion Final
Event – Oral En Banc – scheduled Supreme Court 01/27/2010 Event Oral En Banc – scheduled Final
Received original motion to participate amicus curiae of Professors David Stras and Ryan Scott Supreme Court 01/27/2010 Correspondence Incoming Final
Letter from Appellant’s attorney; they have no objection to the request to file amicus briefs from League of Minnesota Cities and Professors David Stras and Ryan Scott Supreme Court 01/26/2010 Correspondence Incoming Final
Motion – Amicus – Professors David Stras and Ryan Scott Supreme Court 01/26/2010 Motion Amicus – Leave to File Motion Final
Motion – Amicus – League of Minnesota Cities Supreme Court 01/26/2010 Motion Amicus – Leave to File Motion Final
Letter from Appellant’s attorney; they have no objection to the City of St. Paul’s motion to proceed amicus curiae. They request the City’s brief to be filed not later than the Respondent’s brief. Court of Appeals 01/25/2010 Correspondence Incoming Final
Letter from respondent’s attorney informing the court of their email addresses. Supreme Court 01/25/2010 Correspondence Incoming Final
Motion – Amicus – City of St. Paul Supreme Court 01/25/2010 Motion Amicus – Leave to File Motion Final
Letter from appellant’s attorney’s informing the court of their email addresses. Supreme Court 01/21/2010 Correspondence Incoming Final
Order – PAR – Grant Supreme Court 01/19/2010 Order PFR – Grant Final
Notice – Case Filing Court of Appeals 01/13/2010 Notice Case Filing Final
Motion – Expedite Court of Appeals 01/12/2010 Motion Expedite Final
Motion – Expedite review of appeal in the Supreme Court if the petition for accelerated review is granted. Supreme Court 01/12/2010 Motion Expedite Final
Motion – Expedite Consideration of Petition for Accelerated Review Supreme Court 01/12/2010 Motion Expedite Final
Petition – Accelerated Review Supreme Court 01/12/2010 Petition Accelerated Review Final
Statement – Case – Appellant Court of Appeals 01/12/2010 Statement Case – Appellant Final
Notice – Appeal – Case Filed; Judgment 1/8/10 Court of Appeals 01/12/2010 Notice Appeal – Case Filed Final

Disclaimer: Attorney Pro Se’s are systemically denied Access to Courts Sharon4Anderson v. CitySt.Paul 62cv09-1163 A09-2031,2008 Taxes,denied ECF pdf Forensic Files, Nancy Lazaryan 05cr091658,05vb08,A08778,A081577,A082093 et al “but for” Granted this Banking Case

Help Help
  Information   
 

 

 
Case View
ORCA Info

 

Case Information
Case Number: A081883 Filing Date: 10/29/2008    
Jurisdiction: Both Status: Post-Decision      
ORCA: Civil Division Hennepin County District Court Hearing Type: Oral      
Classification: Standard – Civil – Other
Short Title: Imperial Developers, Inc., Plaintiff, vs. Calhoun Development, LLC, Respondent, Regal Custom Homes, Inc., et al., Defendants, Lind Homes, Inc., Respondent, Thompson Plumbing Corp., Respondent, Great Northern I, Inc., Respondent, Southview Design & Construction, Inc., Appellant, BankFirst, Respondent, and The Woodshop of Avon, Inc., additional defendant, Respondent, and Scherer Bros. Lumber Co., intervening defendant and third party plaintiff, Appellant, vs. Matthew Lind, et al., Third Party Defendants, and Simonson Lumber of Ham Lake, Inc., Third Party Plaintiff, vs. Contractors Capital Corporation, et al., Third Party Defendants    
Full Title: Imperial Developers, Inc., Plaintiff, vs. Calhoun Development, LLC, Respondent, Regal Custom Homes, Inc., et al., Defendants, Lind Homes, Inc., Respondent, Thompson Plumping Corp., Respondent, Great Northern I, Inc., Respondent, Southview Design & Construction, Inc., Appellant, BankFirst, Respondent, and The Woodshop of Avon, Inc., additional defendant, Respondent, and Scherer Bros. Lumber Co., intervening defendant and third party plaintiff, Appellant, vs. Matthew Lind, et al., Third Party Defendants, and Simonson Lumber of Ham Lake, Inc., Third Party Plaintiff, vs. Contractors Capital Corporation, et al., Third Party Defendants    
Summary:  
Citation: 775 N.W.2d 895 (Minn. App. 2009)      
PFR Information
Filing Date: 01/08/2010 Status: Pre-Briefing  
Short Title: Imperial Developers, Inc., Plaintiff, vs. Calhoun Development, LLC, Respondent, Regal Custom Homes, Inc., et al., Defendants, Lind Homes, Inc., Respondent, Thompson Plumbing Corp., Respondent, Great Northern I, Inc., Respondent, Southview Design & Construction, Inc., Respondent, BankFirst, Appellant, and The Woodshop of Avon, Inc., additional defendant, Respondent, and Scherer Bros. Lumber Co., intervening defendant and third-party plaintiff, Respondent, vs. Matthew Lind, et al., Third-Party Defendants, and Simonson Lumber of Ham Lake, Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff, vs. Contractors Capital Corporation, et al., Third-Party Defendants Hearing Type: Oral  
     

+ Display Party Information

Docketing Filter View
Display:  ChronologicalThreaded  
Docket Information
Document Description Jurisdiction Filing Date Docket Entry Type Filing Type Status
Order – Grant Amicus – Minnesota Bankers Association Supreme Court 02/16/2010 Order Grant Amicus Final
Order – PFR – Grant Supreme Court 02/16/2010 Order PFR – Grant Final
Response – Petition for Review Supreme Court 01/29/2010 Response Petition for Review Final
Received additional $50 filing fee for the petition for review Supreme Court 01/11/2010 Correspondence Incoming Final
Petition – Further Review Supreme Court 01/08/2010 Petition Further Review Final
Motion – Amicus – Minnesota Bankers Association Supreme Court 01/07/2010 Motion Amicus – Leave to File Motion Final
Opinion – Published Court of Appeals 12/08/2009 Opinion Published Final
Notice – Opinion Release Imminent Court of Appeals 12/03/2009 Notice Opinion Release Imminent Final
Event – Oral – Panel Court of Appeals 09/17/2009 Event Oral – Panel Final
Notice – Oral Argument Date Scheduled Court of Appeals 07/23/2009 Notice Oral Argument Date Scheduled Final
Event – Oral Panel – scheduled for 9/17/09 Court of Appeals 07/23/2009 Event Oral Panel – scheduled Final
Event – Orig. Court/Agency Files/Exhibits Received-BOX- Court of Appeals 03/25/2009 Event Orig. Court/Agency Files/Exhibits Received Final
Brief – Reply Court of Appeals 03/12/2009 Brief Reply Final
Notice – Request Trial Court/Agency File Court of Appeals 03/10/2009 Notice Request Trial Court/Agency File Final
Brief – Respondent Court of Appeals 02/27/2009 Brief Respondent Final
Affidavit – Service; appellant’s brief Court of Appeals 02/05/2009 Affidavit Service Final
Amended affidavit of service for appellant’s brief. Court of Appeals 01/29/2009 Affidavit Service Final
Brief – Appellant Court of Appeals 01/27/2009 Brief Appellant Final
Transcript – Delivery Certificate – Lucy Stageberg Court of Appeals 01/06/2009 Transcript Delivery Certificate Final
Received nonconforming certificate of delivery from CR. Lucy Stageberg Court of Appeals 01/02/2009 Correspondence Incoming Final
Transcript – Delivery Certificate – Tamara Halonen Court of Appeals 12/10/2008 Transcript Delivery Certificate Final
Letter of Thomas M. Zappia; I will not be participating in oral arguments. Oral arguments will be made on behalf of Scherer Bros. Lumber Co. and Southview Design and Construction, Inc. by Ann O’Reilly. Court of Appeals 11/14/2008 Correspondence Incoming Final
Statement – Case – Respondent (Bank First) Court of Appeals 11/13/2008 Statement Case – Respondent Final
Amended Statement – Case – Appellant [purpose of which is to clarify possible “adverse parties” Court of Appeals 11/10/2008 Statement Case – Appellant Final
Transcript – Initial Certificate – Tamara Halonen Court of Appeals 11/06/2008 Transcript Initial Certificate Final
Notice – Attorney Scheduling Conflicts; filed by A.O’Reilly for appellant Court of Appeals 11/06/2008 Notice Attorney Scheduling Conflicts Final
Transcript – Initial Certificate – Lucy Stageberg Court of Appeals 11/04/2008 Transcript Initial Certificate Final
Affidavit – Service for notice of appeal/statement of case on Alliance Bank Court of Appeals 11/04/2008 Affidavit Service Final
Affidavit – Service Court of Appeals 10/31/2008 Affidavit Service Final
Notice – Case Filing Court of Appeals 10/30/2008 Notice Case Filing Final
Statement – Case – Appellants Court of Appeals 10/29/2008 Statement Case – Appellant Final
Notice – Appeal – Case Filed; Order/Judgment 9/16/08 Court of Appeals 10/29/2008 Notice Appeal – Case Filed Final
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.