|FAX TRANSMITTAL Resubmit Sat.19Dec09
Wed 12Aug09 Ramsey Dist.Crt.File 62cv09-1163
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY E-COMMERCE AND FAX:
TO: Ramsey Co. Clerk of Court, Lynae.Olson@courts.state.mn.us tel:651-266-8255 F 266-8263 email@example.com
2nd Jud.Court Admin. Larry.Dease@courts.state.mn.us 651-266-8266 F 266-8278
Sheriff: firstname.lastname@example.org 651-266-9333 F 266-9301
Lori Swanson MN_AG email@example.com 651-296-3353 F 282-2155
St.Paul City Clerk firstname.lastname@example.org 651-266-8688 F 266-8574
and all others as their interest appear.
FAX VIA OUTGOING: SHARON CANNOT RECEIVE FAXES PGS.20
Mon.10Aug09 RESubmitt Sat 19Dec09
CANDIDATE AttorneyGeneral www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com
|Sue Dosal serves as the State Court Administrator of the Minnesota Judicial State Court Administrator’s Office Branch. She was appointed to this position on July 16, 1982.
Please read Briefs re: USSC 10-1032 Disparate Impact titled Magner v. Gallagher LandLords vs. City St. Paul
AFFIDAVIT OF SHARON ANDERSON
VOTE YES MARRIAGE_PHOTO ID AND NO TO LEVY
Humble Thanks to Dear candidate,Your Star Tribune voter’s guide profile has been posted to www.startribune.com SharonAnderson MNSenate64
ISSUES OF JUDICIAL CORRUPTION_ACCESS _DUE PROCESS
http://elections.startribune.com/profiles/49597.html Sharons Blog,WebSite’s www.sharonsenate64.blogspot.com other www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
LATELY SHARON IS SHOCKED HOW MANY GAY AND LESBIANS IN
Rt 1 Box 231
Sharon4Anderson@aol.com AttorneyProSe_Private AG, ECF 65913 Pacer:sa1299 Tel: 651-776-5835 HEALTH CARE Candidate 2012Senate64 www.sharon4anderson.orgwww.sharonsenate64.blogspot.com http://sharon4anderson.wordpress.com/2012/04/14/judicial-corruption
Magner v. Gallagher
|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|10-1032||8th Cir.||Not Argued||Feb 14, 2012||N/A||N/A||OT 2011|
Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C. serves as counsel to the respondents in this case.
Issue: (1) Whether disparate impact claims are cognizable under the Fair Housing Act; and, if so (2) what test should be used to analyze them.
Plain English Issue: (1) Whether a lawsuit can be brought for a violation of the Fair Housing Act based on a practice that is not discriminatory on its own, but has a discriminatory effect; and, if so, (2) how should courts determine whether a practice has a discriminatory effect and violates the Act?
Briefs and Documents
Merits Briefs for the Petitioners
Amicus Briefs in Support of the Petitioners
- Brief of the International Municipal Lawyers Association et al.
- Brief of the Township of Mount Holly, New Jersey
- Brief of the Pacific Legal Foundation et al.
- Brief of the Independent Community Bankers of America et al.
- Brief of the Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund, Inc.
- Brief of the American Bankers Association et al.
Amicus Briefs in Support of Neither Party
Merits Briefs for the Respondents
Amicus Briefs in Support of the Respondents
- Brief of the NAACP Legal Defense & Education Fund
- Brief of the Lawyer’s Committee on Civil Rights et al.
- Brief of the Housing Advocates, Inc., and Buckeye Community Hope Foundation
- Brief of the National Fair Housing Alliance et al.
- Brief of the Opportunity Agenda et al.
- Brief of the ACLU
- Brief of Massachusetts et al.
- Brief of Henry G. Cisneros
- Brief of AARP and Mount Holly Gardens Citizens In Action
- Opinion below (8th Cir.)
- Petition for certiorari
- Brief in opposition of respondents Thomas J. Gallagher et al.
- Petitioners’ reply
rrent Candidate MNAG www.sharon4mnag.blogspot.com
www.sharon4anderson.orgLEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835: HEALTHCARE http://sharon4anderson.wordpress.com/2012/04/14/judicial-corruption-
Originally posted on Livinglies's Weblog:
JOIN US EVERY THURSDAY AT 6PM Eastern time on The Neil Garfield Show. We will discuss the Stenberger decision and other important developments affecting consumers, borrowers and banks. We had 561 listeners so far who were on the air with us or who downloaded the show. Thank you — that is a good start for our first show. And thank you Patrick Giunta, Esq. (Broward County Attorney) as our first guest. For more information call 954-495-9867.
In the case of Wane v. Loan Corp. the 11th Circuit struck down the borrower’s attempt to rescind. The reasoning in that case had to do with whether the originator was the real lender. I think, based upon my review of that and other cases, that the facts were not totally known and perhaps could have been and then included in the pleading. It is one thing to say that you don’t think…
View original 680 more words
Originally posted on The Original Tea Party of Minnesota:
To the above named; Chair Mark Ritchie www.sos.mn.us
Please be so apprised that the undersigned Quitam Relator
Sharon Anderson aka Peterson Scarrella Candidate www.sharon4mnag.blogspot.com challenges the Bizzare Exploitation of ‘Judge David Gassoway aka Labarre of www.dhs.state.mn.us against Blind Litigation
Sharon must have Electronic Notice of all Files, Proceedings in Medicare Spend down,
Ramsey Co. File 690725 Appeal 149632
Please include Affiants Request into your Files.
Chief Compliance Officer
Gregory Gray, 651-431-4266
The chief compliance officer has responsibility for legal and compliance activities throughout the agency.
Appeals and Regulations Division
A meeting of the Electronic Roster Task Force has been scheduled for:
FRIDAY, January 31, 2014
2:00 PM – 2:30 PM
om: 300 North State Office Building
Chair: Secretary of State Mark Ritchie
View original 22 more words
Originally posted on Scanned Retina Resource:
18 USC § 1031 – Major fraud against the United
18 USC § 1031 – Major fraud against the United
1 US Code 2 Notes 3 Updates
Current through Pub. L. 113-31. (See Public Laws for the current
Congress.) (a) Whoever knowingly executes, or attempts to execute,
any scheme or artifice with the intent—
(1) to defraud the United States; or (2) to obtain money or property
by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or
promises, in any grant, contract, subcontract, subsidy, loan,
guarantee, insurance, or other form of Federal assistance, including
through the Troubled Asset Relief Program, an economic stimulus,
recovery or rescue plan provided by the Government, or the
Government’s purchase of any troubled asset as defined in the
Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, or in any
procurement of property or services as a prime contractor with the
United States or as a subcontractor…
View original 721 more words