Feeds:
Posts
Comments
Case Number: A092031  http://macsnc.courts.state.mn.us/ctrack/view/publicCaseMaintenance.do?csNameID=67124&expandParty=Y&display=false&view=N Filing Date: 11/06/2009    
Jurisdiction: Court of Appeals Status: Closed      
ORCA: Civil Division Ramsey County District Court Hearing Type: Nonoral      
Classification: Standard – Civil – Other
Short Title: In the Matter of Delinquent Real Property Taxes for Real Property Described, to wit: Lyman Dayton Addition to St. Paul, Lot 5, Blk 46, a/k/a 697 Surrey Avenue, PIN: 32.29.22.41.0053, Sharon Lee Anderson a/k/a Sharon Scarrella Anderson, record owner    
Full Title: In the Matter of Delinquent Real Property Taxes for Real Property Described, to wit: Lyman Dayton Addition to St. Paul, Lot 5, Blk 46, a/k/a 697 Surrey Avenue, PIN: 32.29.22.41.0053, Sharon Lee Anderson a/k/a Sharon Scarrella Anderson, record owner    
Summary:  
Citation:        

 

- Hide Party Information

Party Information
MACS ID Appellate Role Party Name Attorney(s)
51332 Appellant Sharon Anderson Pro Se
10976 Respondent Ramsey County JEAN STEPAN

Docketing Filter View
Display:  ChronologicalThreaded  
Docket Information
Document Description Jurisdiction Filing Date Docket Entry Type Filing Type Status
Order – Dismiss – Not Stipulated, Entire Case Court of Appeals 01/07/2010 Order Dismiss – Not Stipulated, Entire Case Final
Order – Remedy Deficiencies; requirement for APL to file cc of 9/10/09 judgment is waived. By 12/21 APL to file a NOA and SCA containing original signatures; aff/serv for NOA & SCA; copy of district court’s 9/18/09 IFP Order; 7 copies of APB with aff/serv (one must contain orig. signature) Court of Appeals 12/07/2009 Order Remedy Deficiencies Final
Transcript – Delivery Certificate – Patricia Martinez Court of Appeals 11/19/2009 Transcript Delivery Certificate Final
Notice – Case Filing Court of Appeals 11/12/2009 Notice Case Filing Final
Statement – Case – Appellant Court of Appeals 11/06/2009 Statement Case – Appellant Final
Notice – Appeal – Case Filed Court of Appeals 11/06/2009 Notice Appeal – Case Filed Final
Transcript – Initial Certificate – Patricia Martinez Court of Appeals 10/15/2009 Transcript Initial Certificate Final

 

Your on Search Engine’s  Could not post to Blogger  will try wordpress.com
From: DDAweb
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 04:40:34 -0600
To:
Subject: FC
United States District State of Minnesota

City of West St. Paul, Plaintiff, Notice of and Removal of Dakota County District Court Criminal Case on Grounds

VS. of Judicial Prejudice and Violations of
14th Amendment Due Process Rights.
 
Mary Jane Duchene, Defendant Federal Court File no.___________
Dakota County Citation no. 3-441797
Dakota County Court file: 19WS-CR-09-15734

TO: Dakota County District Court, Attorney for the City of West St. Paul

The undersigned removed this to US District Court BY VIRTUE OF 28 U.S.C. 1443;
28USC1443 – Google Search

“Any of the following … criminal prosecutions, commenced in a State court
may be removed by the defendant to the district court of the United States
for the district and division embracing the place wherein it is pending:

(1) Against any person who is denied or cannot enforce in the courts of
such State a right under any law providing for the equal civil rights of
citizens of the United States, or of all persons within the jurisdiction
thereof[.]

on the following grounds:

1) This Dakota County criminal action is observably a malicious prosecution by the plaintiffs in that action and the plaintiffs failed to comply with the legal process required by law and the Fourteenth and Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution, by stating facts 5th,14th Amendments US Constitution – Google Searchwhich comprise a criminal action, in continuing prosecution, which is shown in the selected court documents attached hereto.
That established US Supreme Court requirements as to required
specificity of a criminal accusation, see. e.g. United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1876),
US v Cruikshank,92US – Google Search quoted and affirmed in Russell v. United States, 369 U.S. 749 at 763-765, Russell v. US 39 US 749 – Google Search which in turn is cited with approval in State v. Gross, 387 N.W. 2d 182 at 189 (Minn. App. 1986) . Gross,387 NW 2d 182 Minn App.1986 – Google Search

PDF]

State of Minnesota District Court County of Dakota First Judicial …

File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat – View as HTML
Oct 25, 2009 … Gross, 387 N.W. 2d 182 at 189. (Minn. App. 1986). That the right to a specific accusation including separate counts for distinct …
www.angelfire.com/mn3/advocate6/2009dog/motionvacatereverse.pdf

That the right to a specific accusation including separate counts for
distinct offenses charged has been incorporated by the fourteenth amendment to the United States Constitution. See: e.g. Cole v. Arkansas, 333 U.S. 196 at 201 (1942),
Cole v. Arkansas,333 US 196 – Google Search and Faretta v. California, 442 U.S. 806 at 818(1975). Faretta v. California – Google Search

The plaintiffs have tried to allege that a police officer, allegedly hear a barking dog noise at my property, from a distance of over 200 feet, when scientific evidence clearly shows it would be impossible to identify such a sound, or even hear it, from such a distance, because sound diminished by about 75% at a distance of 200 feet or sixty meters, SEE SOUND CALCULATOR:

http://www.sengpielaudio.com/calculator-distance.htm.

The failure to withdraw the criminal complaint, AND INSTEAD RELENTLESSLY PURSUE MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, shows the plaintiffs are relying on a failure of due process and fairness in the Dakota County Courts and there is obvioulsy the potential for progressively more insane criminal accusations to transpire in future because of this case.
2) The plaintiff have done this as part of a pattern of misconduct which has occurred over a period of more than fifteen years.
3) The defendant cannot get a fair trial in Dakota County, as detailed in the select Dakota county court documents attached hereto, as there has been a hostile history with the Dakota County.
Federal law requires the automatic disqualification of a Federal judge under certain circumstances.
In 1994, the U.S. Supreme Court held that “Disqualification is required if an objective observer would entertain reasonable questions about the judge’s impartiality. If a judge’s attitude or state of mind leads a detached observer to conclude that a fair and impartial hearing is unlikely, the judge must be disqualified.” [Emphasis added]. Liteky v. U.S., 114 S.Ct. 1147, 1162 (1994).
Liteky v US 114 S.Ct.1147,1162 (1994) – Google Search

Judicial Disqualification

Feb 1, 2000 Liteky v. U.S., 114 S.Ct. 1147, 1162 (1994). Courts have repeatedly held that positive proof of the partiality of a judge is not a
www.clr.org/Judicial-disqualification.html – CachedSimilar

Courts have repeatedly held that positive proof of the partiality of a judge is not a requirement, only the appearance of partiality. Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp., 486 U.S. 847, 108 S.Ct. 2194 (1988) Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp 486 US847 – Google Search(what matters is not the reality of bias or prejudice but its appearance); United States v. Balistrieri, 779 F.2d 1191 (7th Cir. 1985) Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp 486 US847 – Google Search(Section 455(a) “is directed against the appearance of partiality, whether or not the judge is actually biased.”) (“Section 455(a) of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C. 455(a), is not intended to protect litigants from actual bias in their judge but rather to promote public confidence in the impartiality of the judicial process.”) .28USC 455 Judicial Code – Google Search
That Court also stated that Section 455(a) “requires a judge to recuse himself in any proceeding in which her impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” Taylor v. O’Grady, 888 F.2d 1189 (7th Cir. 1989). In Pfizer Inc. v. Lord, 456 F.2d 532 (8th Cir. 1972), the Court stated that “It is important that the litigant not only actually receive justice, but that he believes that he has received justice.”
The Supreme Court has ruled and has reaffirmed the principle that “justice must satisfy the
appearance of justice”, Levine v. United States, 362 U.S. 610, 80 S.Ct. 1038 (1960), citing Offutt v. United States, 348 U.S. 11, 14, 75 S.Ct. 11, 13 (1954). A judge receiving a bribe from an interested party over which he is presiding, does not give the appearance of justice.
“Recusal under Section 455 is self-executing; a party need not file affidavits in support of
recusal and the judge is obligated to recuse herself sua sponte under the stated circumstances.” Taylor v. O’Grady, 888 F.2d 1189 (7th Cir. 1989).
Further, the judge has a legal duty to disqualify himself even if there is no motion asking for his disqualification. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals further stated that “We think that this language [455(a)] imposes a duty on the judge to act sua sponte, even if no motion or affidavit is filed.” Balistrieri, at 1202.
Judges do not have discretion not to disqualify themselves. By law, they are bound to follow the law. Should a judge not disqualify himself as required by law, then the judge has given another example of his “appearance of partiality” which, possibly, further disqualifies the judge. Should another judge not accept the disqualification of the judge, then the second judge has evidenced an”appearance of partiality” and has possibly disqualified himself/ herself. None of the orders issued by any judge who has been disqualified by law would appear to be valid. It would appear that they are void as a matter of law, and are of no legal force or effect.
Should a judge not disqualify himself, then the judge is violation of the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution. United States v. Sciuto, 521 F.2d 842, 845 (7th Cir. 1996)
US v. Sciuto 521 F.2d 842 – Google Search

(“The right to a tribunal free from bias or prejudice is based, not on section 144, but on the Due Process Clause.”).

State and Federal Due Process – Google Search
Should a judge issue any order after he has been disqualified by law, and if the party has been denied of any of his / her property, then the judge may have been engaged in the Federal Crime of “interference with interstate commerce”. The judge has acted in the judge’s personal capacity and not in the judge’s judicial capacity. It has been said that this judge, acting in this manner, has no more lawful authority than someone’s next-door neighbor (provided that he is not a judge).
However some judges may not follow the law.
If you were a non-represented litigant, and should the court not follow the law as to
non-represented litigants, then the judge has expressed an “appearance of partiality” and, under the law, it would seem that he/she has disqualified him/herself.
However, since not all judges keep up to date in the law, and since not all judges follow the law, it is possible that a judge may not know the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court and the other courts on this subject. Notice that it states “disqualification is required” and that a judge “must be disqualified” under certain circumstances.
The Supreme Court has also held that if a judge wars against the Constitution, or if he acts
without jurisdiction, he has engaged in treason to the Constitution. If a judge acts after he has been automatically disqualified by law, then he is acting without jurisdiction, and that suggest that he is then engaging in criminal acts of treason, and may be engaged in extortion and the interference with interstate commerce.
Courts have repeatedly ruled that judges have no immunity for their criminal acts. Since both treason and the interference with interstate commerce are criminal acts, no judge has immunity to engage in such acts.

4) The defendant¹s First Amendment rights are also being abused by this action as this action appears to be retaliation by the City of West St. Paul Attorney, for speaking out on disability issues, via a web site, relevant to Alice Krengel, as the citation was issued one week after the Minnesota Supreme Court ruled against that City Attorney, and in favor of Ms. Krengel.
RELIEF REQUESTED

1. AN INJUNCTION PROHIBITING THE CITY OF WEST ST. PAUL FROM CONTINUING THIS MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, AND CONTINUING TO SOLICIT AND ENGAGE IN DUE PROCESS VIOLATIONS IN THIS ACTION.
2. DAMAGES (INCLUSIVE BUT NOT LIMITED TO ACTUAL, PUNITIVE, AND EXEMPLARY) FOR ENGAGING IN A LONG TERM PATTERN OF HARASSMENT AGAINST THE DEFENDANT, FOR AN UNSPECIFIED AMOUNT.
January 11, 2010 Respectfully Submitted:
*
Mary Jane Duchene, BA, BS
1144 Ottawa Avenue
West St,. Paul, MN 55118
Fax: 651 457 4376
MariJaynDuchene@aol.com

http://www.angelfire.com/mn3advocate6/2009dog/wspnoise.html

Date: Sunday, January 10, 2010, 2:05 PM

OPEN LETTER TO CHIEF JUDGE EDWARD TOUSSAINT
RE: CANONS CONSTRUCTION
MS 645.Canons of Construction Clarify “Abandoned” A09-2031
 
                             Sun.10Jan10          
Judge Profile  To: Chief Judge Eward Toussaint
 
 
ISSUES: 
 Pursuant to Ramsey 62cv09-1163 « Sharon4anderson’s Weblog Dist.Crt. File 62cv09-1163(Vandenorth)
 
Affiant “takes” Issue with your “Orders” Please clarify “abandoned”
 
Published now for Public Scrunity
 
COUNT I  OATH OF OFFICE
 
HAS CHIEF JUDGE EDWARD TOUSSAINT VIOLATED HIS OATH V. SHARON SCARRELLA ANDERSON?
Every judge of such municipal court, before he or she enters upon the duties of his or her office, shall take and subscribe the following oath or affirmation: “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of Washington, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of the office of judge of the municipal court of the city of . . . . . . (naming such city) according to the best of my ability; and I do further certify that I do not advocate, nor am I a member of an organization that advocates, the overthrow of the government of the United States by force or violence.” The oath shall be filed in the office of the county auditor. He or she shall also give such bonds to the state and city for the faithful performance of his or her duties as may be by law or ordinance directed.
 
COUNT II 42USC sec.1983-86
 Civil Rights of Widow_WhiteWoman_Whistleblower 42usc
Civil Rights Act

Statutes Pertaining to Violations of Civil Rights. Title 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Title 42 U.S.C § 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights
www.defraudingamerica.com/civil_rights_act.html – CachedSimilar
 
in the “takings” of 91 Chrysler, denying “Transit”,Commerce by Theft, unabated by Black Police Chief John Harringon?
covert methodology of Diesel Therapy
a.  “takings” Drivers License by Senile Judge Larry Cohen ,without Court Order and  who’s 3rd Wife Kathleen Donnelly Cohen is VP of Comcast Cable  Franchised by City St.Paul  Mike Reardon with Relative Jack Reardon DSI Building Inspector giving rise to Appeal A09-2031 (Toussaint) Denial of Constutional Issue of
MS 429
 
COUNT 111  Constutional Challenge Rule 24.04
city attorney Judy Hanson
b.  Theft of Sharons 91 Chrysler to St.Police Impound Lot,
legaleaglesharon.blogspot.com  re: Manager Aaron Foster . 
c.  Diesel Therapy on the general public to force Bus Ridership and that Damm Light Rail, now “taking” busines  US CODE: Title 18,1595. Civil remedy along University Ave.
COUNT IV   INTERFERANCE WITH HEATLH CARE DIESEL THERAPY 
Diesel Therapy – Google Search  and to join with 62cv09-011693  Unallotment File with Affidavit of Prejudice against Kathleen Gearin in her offical and personal capacitys re: SCAP “taking” Homestead Credits on Disabled, SilverSTar Marine etc.
 
 
 
 
COUNT V  DUE PROCESS FOR 30 YEARS
AFFIANT HAS BEEN DENIED FOR 30 YEARS IN HER COMMERCE,PROPERTY,TRANSPORTATION ANSASC_1988_15 D MARRIAGE,CHILDREN DM-1399_23 RIGHTS 
 
 
memorandum of case law’s 
 
Click here: City of Minneapolis, et al., Respondents, vs. Steven F. Meldahl, Appellant. C6-99-1490, Court of Appeals Published

                                         www.lufsky.blogspot.com   www.sharon4anderson.wordpress.com  www.sharon4anderson.org 

 
                             Punitative,Compensatory,Tort Damages in the millions for 30 years of heinous, repugnant Death,Disabilitys,Disparagment of Titles.
 
                            When the Court wilful fail to implement pdf files and/or Read the Entire Records………..Pervase/Fatal  Any all Bogus Judgments are therefore VACATED.

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299

telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower,
Sharon4 Anderson – Google Profile Candidate AG2010 www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com Blogger: User Profile: Sharon Anderson SharonsYahoo! iGoogle

Homestead Act of 1862 Twitter / Sharon4Anderson Shar1058’s Buzz Activity Page – My Buzz Activity – Yahoo! Buzz neopopulism.org – Pro Se Dec Action Litigation Pack Sharon4Anderson | Scribd Document’s are based on SEC filings, Blogger: Dashboard Home |
FAIR USE NOTICEThis site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of whistleblower protection issues, MY FindLaw SharonsWritProA06_1150_30Jun06_26

The CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Emailers
kare11.com_SA
Sharons-Psychic-Whispers: Sharons Gypsy Curse-Court-Cop Corruption 3Apr0http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPlawsuit/courtfilings/Docket.htm Sharon4Council: DLJ Management v. City St. Paul A06-2118,Money LaunderinNo direct un-apportioned tax confirmed by the US Supreme Court rulings in CHAS. C. STEWARD MACH. CO. v. DAVIS, 301 U.S. 548, 581-582(1937) g
andFCC Complaints – http://sharons-copywrite.blogspot.comknowledge gained as financial journalists , http://taxthemax.blogspot.com securities they recommend to readers, affiliated entities, employees, and agents an initial trade Public domain recommendation published on the Internet, after a direct mail publication is sent, before acting Google Search Times v. Sullvian Libel with malice – on that recommendations, and may contain errors. Investment decisions should not be based solely on these or other Public Office documents expressly forbids its writers from having financial interests in Google Search BlogItBabe2007 Candidate profile Sharon4Anderson’s Legal BlogBriefs Sharon4And

WOW !!!   You Go Girl !!!
Blessings,
Bill
— On Sun, 1/10/10, Sharon4Anderson@aol.com <Sharon4Anderson@aol.com> wrote:

From: Sharon4Anderson@aol.com <Sharon4Anderson@aol.com>
Subject: OPEN LETTR(Toussaint) A09-2031 DIESELTHERAPY TAKING DL AND CAR
To: edward.toussaint@courts.state.mn.us, eric.magnuson@courts.state.mn.us, fred.grittner@courts.state.mn.us, john.vandenorth@courts.state.mn.us, tim.pawlenty@state.mn.us, askdoj@usdoj.gov, askcorrections@co.ramsey.mn.us, askhomesteads@co.ramsey.mn.us, AskHumanServices@co.ramsey.mn.us, baverill@mndaily.com, eeskola@cbs.com, ddavis@forumcomm.com, hopfen@startribune.com, rstassen-berger@pioneerpress.com, ochsnews@yahoo.com, bbowring@tpt.org, charley.shaw@legal-ledger.com, mlohn@ap.org, jragsdale@pioneerpress.com, ahart@kare11.com, mfischenich@mankatofreepress.com, EEskola@aol.com, tim.budig@ecm-inc.com, ndraper@startribune.com, lmccallum@mpr.org, bsalisbury@pioneerpress.com, lschumacher@stcloudtimes.com, pcondon@ap.org, mbrunswick@startribune.com, ntibbetts@mndaily.com, pjkessler@wcco.cbs.com, jcroman@kare11.com, plopez@startribune.com, tscheck@mpr.org, thauser@kstp.com, mlahammer@tpt.org, pdoyle@startribune.com, rrosario@pioneerpress.com, klksnews@yahoo.com, lsturdevant@startribune.com, jayjohnson@postbulletin.com, bbakst@ap.org, dbrewster@startribune.com, glenn.wilson@state.mn.us, commerce.commissioner@state.mn.us, financial.commerce@state.mn.us, weights.measures@state.mn.us, energy.info@state.mn.us, securities.commerce@state.mn.us, licensing.commerce@state.mn.us, mn.relay@state.mn.us, telecom.commerce@state.mn.us, unclaimed.property@state.mn.us, commerce.webmaster@state.mn.us, insurance.commerce@state.mn.us, market.assurance@state.mn.us, general.commerce@state.mn.us, petrofund.commerce@state.mn.us, marcia.moermond@ci.stpaul.mn.us, kenneth.smith@ci.stpaul.mn.us, margaret.egan@ci.stpaul.mn.us, elizabeth.davis@ci.stpaul.mn.us, trudy.moloney@ci.stpaul.mn.us, thomas.davenport@ci.stpaul.mn.us, mkib73@hotmail.com, tim@e-democracy.org, eva@evaformayor.com, Sharon4Mayor@aol.com, BillDahn4Mayor@aol.com, chris.coleman@ci.stpaul.mn.us, bob@calhouncompanies.com, will@willrossbach.com, aonealpha@yahoo.com, mayorlongrie@yahoo.com, jtstiles@gmail.com, FreedomLawSchool@yahoogroups.com, COURTWATCHERS_OF_AMERICA@yahoogroups.com.luis
Cc: bruc0015@umn.edu, silha@tc.umn.edu, a_democracy@yahoo.com, nancylazaryan@gmail.com, leslie@lesliedavis.org, shari.moore@ci.stpaul.mn.us, Sharia4Law@aol.com, curt.brown@startribune.com, webmaster@am1500.com, infor@judicialwatch.org, JURIST@law.pitt.edu, b.todd.jones@usdoj.gov, newsroom@mpr.org, newstips@wcco.com
Date: Sunday, January 10, 2010, 2:05 PM

OPEN LETTER TO CHIEF JUDGE EDWARD TOUSSAINT
RE: CANONS CONSTRUCTION
MS 645.Canons of Construction Clarify “Abandoned” A09-2031

 

Court of Appeals


Download/view high-resolution version of this photo

LEGAL NOTICE TO PETITION ENBANC,  ALL APPELATE JUDGES,Conspiracy Planet – Whistleblower: Rodney Stich – Whistleblower Sues Crooked Judges RE: THEN QUO WARRANTO TO CHIEF JUSTICE ERICFOR DAMAGES UNDERhttp://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=54&contentid=103&page=2

 CIVIL RIGHTS
) ACT (42 U.S.C. Sections 1983-1986);   http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=Civil+Rights+42USC+1983-1986

  http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=RICO+USC+1961-1965

RICO (18 U.S.C. Sections 1961-1965);  ) BIVENS DOCTRINE; FRAUD;  http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=Bivens+Doctrine+Fraud+Declaratory+Judgment

    ) DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
) (28 U.S.C. Sections 2201, 2202);           Declaratory Judgment 28USC 2201,2202 – Google Search
) CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS;                    Constitutional Violations – Google Search
) REPORTING FEDERAL CRIMES
) (18 U.S.C. Section 4);                                             Reporting Fed. Crimes 18USC section 4 – Google Search
) 28 U.S.C. Section 1361 REQUIRING                 
) FEDERAL OFFICER TO PERFORM A DUTY       28 USC sec 1361 – Google Search    http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=28+USC+sec+1361
)                                                                                         State Jury Trial and Removal to Federal Court – Google Search
) DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL ON ALL
) JURY ISSUES , AND OR REMOVAL TO FEDERAL COURT.  Jury Trial and Removal to Federal Court – Google Search

 

Case Number: A092031ToussaintORA092031-1207.pdf Filing Date: 11/06/2009    
Jurisdiction: Court of Appeals Status: Closed      
ORCA: Civil Division Ramsey County District Court Hearing Type: Nonoral      
Classification: Standard – Civil – Other
Short Title: In the Matter of Delinquent Real Property Taxes for Real Property Described, to wit: Lyman Dayton Addition to St. Paul, Lot 5, Blk 46, a/k/a 697 Surrey Avenue, PIN: 32.29.22.41.0053, Sharon Lee Anderson a/k/a Sharon Scarrella Anderson, record owner    
Full Title: In the Matter of Delinquent Real Property Taxes for Real Property Described, to wit: Lyman Dayton Addition to St. Paul, Lot 5, Blk 46, a/k/a 697 Surrey Avenue, PIN: 32.29.22.41.0053, Sharon Lee Anderson a/k/a Sharon Scarrella Anderson, record owner    
Summary:  
Citation:        

 

+ Display Party Information

Docketing Filter View
Display:  ChronologicalThreaded    
Docket Information
Document Description Jurisdiction Filing Date Docket Entry Type Filing Type Status
Order – Dismiss – Not Stipulated, Entire Case Court of Appeals 01/07/2010 Order Dismiss – Not Stipulated, Entire Case Final
Order – Remedy Deficiencies; requirement for APL to file cc of 9/10/09 judgment is waived. By 12/21 APL to file a NOA and SCA containing original signatures; aff/serv for NOA & SCA; copy of district court’s 9/18/09 IFP Order; 7 copies of APB with aff/serv (one must contain orig. signature) Court of Appeals 12/07/2009 Order Remedy Deficiencies Final
Transcript – Delivery Certificate – Patricia Martinez Court of Appeals 11/19/2009 Transcript Delivery Certificate Final
Notice – Case Filing Court of Appeals 11/12/2009 Notice Case Filing Final
Statement – Case – Appellant Court of Appeals 11/06/2009 Statement Case – Appellant Final
Notice – Appeal – Case Filed Court of Appeals 11/06/2009 Notice Appeal – Case Filed Final
Transcript – Initial Certificate – Patricia Martinez

Civil, Family & Probate Case Records Search Results
Logout Search Menu New Civil Search  Search Criteria: 62cv09-1163
Location : All MNCIS Sites – Case Search Help
Case Number Style Filed/Location/Judicial Officer Type/Status
62-CV-09-1163 Delinquent Real Property Taxes for 2008
02/12/2009
Ramsey Civil
VanDeNorth, John B., Jr.
Administrative File
Closed

 

Court of Appeals  

Logout Search Menu New Civil Search Back   
Location : All MNCIS Sites – Case Search Help
Register of Actions
Case No. 62-CV-09-1163
Delinquent Real Property Taxes for 2008 §
§
§
§
§
§
Case Type: Administrative File
Date Filed: 02/12/2009
Location: Ramsey Civil
Judicial Officer: VanDeNorth, John B., Jr.
Party Information
 

Lead Attorneys

 

Topic

 

Delinquent Real Property Taxes for 2008     STEPAN, JEAN
  

Retained

 

Events & Orders of the Court
      DISPOSITIONS
02/12/2009     Closed administratively
09/10/2009     Judgment (Judicial Officer: VanDeNorth, John B., Jr.)
       
      OTHER EVENTS AND HEARINGS
02/12/2009     Notice-Other
03/31/2009     Affidavit for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis
03/31/2009     Order-Other (Judicial Officer: Lindman, Dale B. )
03/31/2009     Affidavit-Other
04/02/2009     Other Document
04/06/2009     Affidavit of Service
04/06/2009     Correspondence
04/06/2009     Other Document
04/06/2009     Other Document
04/06/2009     Other Document
04/07/2009     Order to Remove (Judicial Officer: Johnson, Gregg E. )
04/09/2009     Notice of Case Reassignment
04/10/2009     Correspondence
06/26/2009     Affidavit of Publication
06/26/2009     Other Document
07/06/2009     Publicly Viewable Note to File
07/15/2009     Motion
07/15/2009     Memorandum
07/15/2009     Affidavit-Other
07/15/2009     Affidavit-Other
07/15/2009     Affidavit of Service
08/10/2009     Affidavit of Prejudice
08/12/2009     Notice of Motion and Motion
08/13/2009     Other Document
08/17/2009     Motion
08/19/2009     Other Document
08/20/2009     Motion Summary Judgment  (10:30 AM) (Judicial Officer VanDeNorth, John B., Jr.)

Result: Held

09/09/2009     Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order (Judicial Officer: VanDeNorth, John B., Jr. )
09/10/2009     Judgment
09/10/2009     Notice of Entry of Judgment
09/11/2009     Other Document
09/11/2009     Other Document
09/14/2009     Notice of Appeal
09/14/2009     Other Document
09/14/2009     Supplemental Affidavit for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis
09/15/2009     Supplemental Affidavit for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis
09/18/2009     Supplemental Order for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis (Judicial Officer: VanDeNorth, John B., Jr. )
09/18/2009     Correspondence
09/21/2009     Affidavit of Service
10/20/2009     Other Document
10/27/2009     Notice of Appeal
10/30/2009     Affidavit of Service
11/02/2009     Statement of Case
11/05/2009     Affidavit-Other
11/17/2009     Notice of Case Filing
11/18/2009     Certificate of Receipt of Transcript-Appellate Court
11/18/2009     Transcript
12/02/2009     Statement of Case
12/23/2009     Other Document
12/28/2009     Briefs
01/08/2010     Order-Other (Judicial Officer: Toussaint, Edward, Jr. )  
10/15/2009 Transcript Initial Certificate Final

ToussaintORA092031-1207.pdf

 
Case Number: A080767 Filing Date: 05/02/2008
Jurisdiction: Both Status: Post-Decision (COA)
Short Title: Eagan Economic Development Authority, Respondent, vs. U-Haul Company of Minnesota a/k/a U-Haul Co. of Minnesota, et al., Appellants, Randall J. Quam, et al., Appellants, Larson Training Services, Inc. d/b/a Larson’s Automotive Repair Services, Appellants, vs. Minnesota’s Credit Union, et al., Respondents Below, Irma L. Parranto, et al., Respondents, Jamal D. Ansari, et al., Respondents Below Hearing Type: Oral

 

Originating Court/Agency Information
Appeal From: District Court Other:    
Court/Agency: Hastings Civil Division Dakota County District Court      
Orig Case Number: 19-CX-07-030126 Orig Case Title: EAGAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, A MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL vs. MINNESOTAS CREDIT UNION, A MINNESOTA CORPORATION    
Related Case Number(s):  
    Decisionmaker(s)
    Michael J. Maye

Case Number: A080767 Filing Date: 05/02/2008    
Jurisdiction: Both Status: Post-Decision      
ORCA: Hastings Civil Division Dakota County District Court Hearing Type: Oral      
Classification: Standard – Civil – Other
Short Title: Eagan Economic Development Authority, Respondent, vs. U-Haul Company of Minnesota a/k/a U-Haul Co. of Minnesota, et al., Appellants, Randall J. Quam, et al., Appellants, Larson Training Services, Inc. d/b/a Larson’s Automotive Repair Services, Appellants, vs. Minnesota’s Credit Union, et al., Respondents Below, Irma L. Parranto, et al., Respondents, Jamal D. Ansari, et al., Respondents Below    
Full Title: Eagan Economic Development Authority, Respondent, vs. U-Haul Company of Minnesota a/k/a U-Haul Co. of Minnesota, et al., Appellants, Randall J. Quam, et al., Appellants, Larson Training Services, Inc. d/b/a Larson’s Automotive Repair Services, Appellants, vs. Minnesota’s Credit Union, et al., Respondents Below, Irma L. Parranto, et al., Respondents, Jamal D. Ansari, et al., Respondents Below    
Summary:  
Citation: 765 N.W.2d 403 (Minn. App. 2009)http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=765+NW2d+403%28Minn.App.2009%29&btnG=Google+Search      
PFR Information
Filing Date: 06/23/2009 Status: Decision  
Short Title: Eagan Economic Development Authority, Appellant, vs. U-Haul Company of Minnesota a/k/a U-Haul Co. of Minnesota, et al., Respondents, Randall J. Quam, et al., Respondents, Larson Training Services, Inc. d/b/a Larson’s Automotive Repair Services, Respondents, vs. Minnesota’s Credit Union, et al., Respondents Below, Irma L. Parranto, et al., Respondents, Jamal D. Ansari, et al., Respondents Below Hearing Type: Oral  
     

+ Display Party Information

Docketing Filter View
Display:  ChronologicalThreaded  
Docket Information
Document Description Jurisdiction Filing Date Docket Entry Type Filing Type Status
Event – Oral – En Banc Supreme Court 01/06/2010 Event Oral – En Banc Final
Event – Oral En Banc – scheduled Supreme Court 11/30/2009 Event Oral En Banc – scheduled Final
Brief – Reply Supreme Court 11/12/2009 Brief Reply Final
Brief – Amicus; Institute for Justice Minnesota Chapter Supreme Court 11/06/2009 Brief Amicus Final
Brief – Respondent Supreme Court 10/28/2009 Brief Respondent Final
Received amended appendix to appellant’s brief Supreme Court 10/19/2009 Correspondence Incoming Final
Brief – Amicus; League of Minnesota Cities Supreme Court 10/02/2009 Brief Amicus Final
Brief – Appellant Supreme Court 09/25/2009 Brief Appellant Final
Order – Grant Amicus for Institute for Justice Minnesota Chapter Supreme Court 09/17/2009 Order Grant Amicus Final
Motion – Amicus – Institute for Justice Minnesota Chapter Supreme Court 09/10/2009 Motion Amicus – Leave to File Motion Final
Order – Grant Amicus of League of Minnesota Cities Supreme Court 08/26/2009 Order Grant Amicus Final
Order – PFR – Grant Supreme Court 08/26/2009 Order PFR – Grant Final
Response – Petition for Review of Amerco Real Estate Co. & U-Haul Co. Supreme Court 07/24/2009 Response Petition for Review Final
Motion – Amicus – League of Minnesota Cities Supreme Court 07/06/2009 Motion Amicus – Leave to File Motion Final
Petition – Further Review Supreme Court 06/30/2009 Petition Further Review Final
Letter sent to the attorney for Eagan Economic Development Authority regarding the nonconforming petiton for review received on June 17, 2009. Supreme Court 06/23/2009 Correspondence Outgoing Final
Other – Docket Notation – Received nonconforming petiton for review from Eagan Economic Development Authority Supreme Court 06/17/2009 Other Docket Notation Final
Objection – Costs and Disbursements Court of Appeals 06/08/2009 Objection Costs and Disbursements Final
Letter to Clerk of the Appellate Courts regarding clarification of Notice of Taxation of Costs. Court of Appeals 06/08/2009 Affidavit Service Final
Notice – Taxation of Costs Court of Appeals 06/03/2009 Notice Taxation of Costs Final
Opinion – Published Court of Appeals 05/19/2009 Opinion Published Final
Notice – Opinion Release Imminent Court of Appeals 05/14/2009 Notice Opinion Release Imminent Final
Event – Oral – Panel Court of Appeals 02/19/2009 Event Oral – Panel Final
Notice – Oral Argument Date Scheduled Court of Appeals 12/24/2008 Notice Oral Argument Date Scheduled Final
Event – Oral Panel – scheduled for 2/19/09, #200, 9:30 Court of Appeals 12/24/2008 Event Oral Panel – scheduled Final
Event – Orig. Court/Agency Files/Exhibits Received-BOX- Court of Appeals 10/10/2008 Event Orig. Court/Agency Files/Exhibits Received Final
Notice – Request Trial Court/Agency File Court of Appeals 09/26/2008 Notice Request Trial Court/Agency File Final
Brief – Reply Court of Appeals 09/23/2008 Brief Reply Final
Brief – Respondent; Eagan Economic Development Authority Court of Appeals 09/10/2008 Brief Respondent Final
Notice – Attorney Withdrawal – U-Haul & Americo Real Estate Co. Court of Appeals 08/15/2008 Notice Attorney Withdrawal or Substitution Final
Brief – Appellant Court of Appeals 08/12/2008 Brief Appellant Final
Order – Deny; the amount of supersedeas bond remanded to district court Court of Appeals 07/22/2008 Order Deny Final
Transcript – Delivery Certificate – Lois Schwelling Court of Appeals 07/09/2008 Transcript Delivery Certificate Final
Joint Reply – Response – Motion Court of Appeals 07/03/2008 Reply Other Final
Response – Motion (Respondent EDA) Court of Appeals 06/26/2008 Response Motion Final
Appellants’ Motion – for Review of Stay Orders Court of Appeals 06/20/2008 Motion Other Final
Letter – Respondent, American Accounts & Advisers, Inc., will not be filing a respondent’s brief. Court of Appeals 05/21/2008 Correspondence Incoming Final
Correspondence – Incoming Court of Appeals 05/20/2008 Correspondence Incoming Final
Transcript – Initial Certificate – Lois Schwelling Court of Appeals 05/19/2008 Transcript Initial Certificate Final
Statement – Case – Respondent Eagan Economic Development Authority Court of Appeals 05/12/2008 Statement Case – Respondent Final
Notice – Case Filing Court of Appeals 05/06/2008 Notice Case Filing Final
Statement – Case – Appellants Court of Appeals 05/02/2008 Statement Case – Appellant Final
Notice – Appeal – Case Filed; Order 4/16/08 Court of Appeals 05/02/2008 Notice Appeal – Case Filed Final

r

 Federal Court Forms http://www.mnd.uscourts.gov/FORMS/court_forms.shtml Educational  Iteresting “Due Process” http://www.state.il.us/court/OPINIONS/SupremeCourt/2009/December/107429.pdf  http://www.lpa.state.mn.us/pdf/infopackets/EminentDomaininMinnesota.pdf

Click here: Eminent Domain Cases MN – Google Search  Scrool down to the latest Eminen Domain Case re: EagenNews results for Eminent Domain Cases MN

Minnesota Supreme Court hears Eagan eminent domain case‎ – 16 hours ago

At issue is whether the city’s economic development authority had the power to seize the three properties by eminent domain, a controversial development

Pioneer Press8 related articles »  http://www.inversecondemnation.com/files/opa080767-0519.pdf

 
Eagan News – Topix

A080767 Supreme Court Eagan Economic Development Authority, Appellant, vs. U-Haul Company of Minnesota a/k/a U-Haul Co. of Minnesota, et al., Respondents, Randall J. Quam, et al., Respondents, Larson Training Services, Inc. d/b/a Larson’s Automotive Repair Services, Respondents, vs. Minnesota’s Credit Union, et al., Respondents Below, Irma L. Parranto, et al., Respondents, Jamal D. Ansari, et al., Respondents Below Decision Civil Other 06/23/2009
A080767 Court of Appeals Eagan Economic Development Authority, Respondent, vs. U-Haul Company of Minnesota a/k/a U-Haul Co. of Minnesota, et al., Appellants, Randall J. Quam, et al., Appellants, Larson Training Services, Inc. d/b/a Larson’s Automotive Repair Services, Appellants, vs. Minnesota’s Credit Union, et al., Respondents Below, Irma L. Parranto, et al., Respondents, Jamal D. Ansari, et al., Respondents Below

Click here: C-Track – Public Site   It would be E-Commerce to pdf all Documents for Public Scrunity   When you type in the File just type 767     www.sharon4anderson.wordpress.com   trying to have all Files in pdf format
 
 
 
Help http://macsnc.courts.state.mn.us/ctrack/search/publicCaseSearch.do#
http://macsnc.courts.state.mn.us/ctrack/search/publicCaseSearch.do   http://macsnc.courts.state.mn.us/ctrack/search/publicCaseSearch.do#   
 

 

 
Case Search
Participant Search

 

Case Search
Case Number: Case Title: Case Group:   Abbreviated Adversarial Administrative Files Other Professional Regulation Standard
Jurisdiction:   Court of Appeals Supreme Court Status:   Archived Briefing Closed Court Hearing Decision Open Panel Hearing Petition PFR Post-Decision Pre-Appeal Pre-Briefing Pre-Hearing Referee Stayed Case Type:   Ad Hoc Committee-Task Force Attorney Civil Criminal Election Contest Interdistrict Assignment Judge Judicial Appeal Panel Other Petition for Discretionary Review (Rule 105) Rules Proceeding Standing Committee-Task Force Writs
Date From: http://macsnc.courts.state.mn.us/ctrack/search/publicCaseSearch.do# To: http://macsnc.courts.state.mn.us/ctrack/search/publicCaseSearch.do# Case SubType:   1st Deg. Murder-Deft. Postconviction 1st Deg. Murder-Direct 1st Deg. Murder-Prosec. Acquittal/Vac… 1st Deg. Murder-Prosec. Postconviction Admin Rule Decl Jdgment Adoption Archived Board of Law Examiners Appeal Certified Question (foreign court) Certified Question (MN court) Certiorari Conditions of Release Conviction Discipline Economic Security Family Habeas Corpus Implied Consent Juvenile Delinq.-Appeal by Child or P… Juvenile Delinq.-Certified Question Juvenile Delinq.-EJJ/Certification Juvenile Delinq.-Non-EJJ/Certification Juvenile Delinq.-Probation Revocation Juvenile Delinq.-Prosec. App.-Denial … Juvenile Delinq.-Prosec. App.-Pretrial Juvenile Delinq.-Prosec. App.-Sentenc… Juvenile Protection-Other Juvenile Protection-Termination of Pa… Mental Commitment/Psychopathic Person… Other Other-Direct Paternity Postconviction Pre-Trial Probate/Guardianship/Conservatorship Prohibition/Mandamus Prohibition/Mandamus-Direct Prosec. Acquittal-Vacation Prosec. Postconviction Reinstatement Review Panel Decision Sentencing-Probation Revocation Tax Court Trusteeship Unlawful Detainer/Eviction Workers’ Comp
Exclude Closed/Archived:
 
1 to 2 of 2 records are displayed.         

Search Results
javascript:postSortOrder('CsNumber', 'ASC'); Case Number javascript:postSortOrder('CsNumber', 'DESC'); javascript:postSortOrder('JurisDictionNm', 'ASC'); Jurisdiction javascript:postSortOrder('JurisdictionNm', 'DESC'); Short Title javascript:postSortOrder('Description', 'ASC'); Status javascript:postSortOrder('Description', 'DESC'); javascript:postSortOrder('CsTypeNm', 'ASC'); Type javascript:postSortOrder('CsTypeNm', 'DESC'); javascript:postSortOrder('CsSubTypeNm', 'ASC'); SubType javascript:postSortOrder('CsSubTypeNm', 'DESC'); javascript:postSortOrder('SQLFileDt', 'ASC'); Filing Date javascript:postSortOrder('SQLFileDt', 'DESC');
A080767 Supreme Court Eagan Economic Development Authority, Appellant, vs. U-Haul Company of Minnesota a/k/a U-Haul Co. of Minnesota, et al., Respondents, Randall J. Quam, et al., Respondents, Larson Training Services, Inc. d/b/a Larson’s Automotive Repair Services, Respondents, vs. Minnesota’s Credit Union, et al., Respondents Below, Irma L. Parranto, et al., Respondents, Jamal D. Ansari, et al., Respondents Below Decision Civil Other 06/23/2009
A080767 Court of Appeals Eagan Economic Development Authority, Respondent, vs. U-Haul Company of Minnesota a/k/a U-Haul Co. of Minnesota, et al., Appellants, Randall J. Quam, et al., Appellants, Larson Training Services, Inc. d/b/a Larson’s Automotive Repair Services, Appellants, vs. Minnesota’s Credit Union, et al., Respondents Below, Irma L. Parranto, et al., Respondents, Jamal D. Ansari, et al., Respondents Below Post-Decision Civil Other 05/02/2008
1 to 2 of 2 records are displayed.         

Help http://macsnc.courts.state.mn.us/ctrack/view/publicCaseMaintenance.do?csNameID=63483#
http://macsnc.courts.state.mn.us/ctrack/search/publicCaseSearch.do   http://macsnc.courts.state.mn.us/ctrack/view/publicCaseMaintenance.do?csNameID=63483#   
 

 

 
Case View
ORCA Info

 

Case Information
Case Number: A080767 Filing Date: 05/02/2008    
Jurisdiction: Both Status: Post-Decision      
ORCA: Hastings Civil Division Dakota County District Court Hearing Type: Oral      
Classification: Standard – Civil – Other
Short Title: Eagan Economic Development Authority, Respondent, vs. U-Haul Company of Minnesota a/k/a U-Haul Co. of Minnesota, et al., Appellants, Randall J. Quam, et al., Appellants, Larson Training Services, Inc. d/b/a Larson’s Automotive Repair Services, Appellants, vs. Minnesota’s Credit Union, et al., Respondents Below, Irma L. Parranto, et al., Respondents, Jamal D. Ansari, et al., Respondents Below    
Full Title: Eagan Economic Development Authority, Respondent, vs. U-Haul Company of Minnesota a/k/a U-Haul Co. of Minnesota, et al., Appellants, Randall J. Quam, et al., Appellants, Larson Training Services, Inc. d/b/a Larson’s Automotive Repair Services, Appellants, vs. Minnesota’s Credit Union, et al., Respondents Below, Irma L. Parranto, et al., Respondents, Jamal D. Ansari, et al., Respondents Below    
Summary:  
Citation: 765 N.W.2d 403 (Minn. App. 2009)      
PFR Information
Filing Date: 06/23/2009 Status: Decision  
Short Title: Eagan Economic Development Authority, Appellant, vs. U-Haul Company of Minnesota a/k/a U-Haul Co. of Minnesota, et al., Respondents, Randall J. Quam, et al., Respondents, Larson Training Services, Inc. d/b/a Larson’s Automotive Repair Services, Respondents, vs. Minnesota’s Credit Union, et al., Respondents Below, Irma L. Parranto, et al., Respondents, Jamal D. Ansari, et al., Respondents Below Hearing Type: Oral  
     

+ Display Party Information

Docketing Filter View
Display:  ChronologicalThreaded  
Docket Information
Document Description Jurisdiction Filing Date Docket Entry Type Filing Type Status
Event – Oral – En Banc Supreme Court 01/06/2010 Event Oral – En Banc Final
Event – Oral En Banc – scheduled Supreme Court 11/30/2009 Event Oral En Banc – scheduled Final
Brief – Reply Supreme Court 11/12/2009 Brief Reply Final
Brief – Amicus; Institute for Justice Minnesota Chapter Supreme Court 11/06/2009 Brief Amicus Final
Brief – Respondent Supreme Court 10/28/2009 Brief Respondent Final
Received amended appendix to appellant’s brief Supreme Court 10/19/2009 Correspondence Incoming Final
Brief – Amicus; League of Minnesota Cities Supreme Court 10/02/2009 Brief Amicus Final
Brief – Appellant Supreme Court 09/25/2009 Brief Appellant Final
Order – Grant Amicus for Institute for Justice Minnesota Chapter Supreme Court 09/17/2009 Order Grant Amicus Final
Motion – Amicus – Institute for Justice Minnesota Chapter Supreme Court 09/10/2009 Motion Amicus – Leave to File Motion Final
Order – Grant Amicus of League of Minnesota Cities Supreme Court 08/26/2009 Order Grant Amicus Final
Order – PFR – Grant Supreme Court 08/26/2009 Order PFR – Grant Final
Response – Petition for Review of Amerco Real Estate Co. & U-Haul Co. Supreme Court 07/24/2009 Response Petition for Review Final
Motion – Amicus – League of Minnesota Cities Supreme Court 07/06/2009 Motion Amicus – Leave to File Motion Final
Petition – Further Review Supreme Court 06/30/2009 Petition Further Review Final
Letter sent to the attorney for Eagan Economic Development Authority regarding the nonconforming petiton for review received on June 17, 2009. Supreme Court 06/23/2009 Correspondence Outgoing Final
Other – Docket Notation – Received nonconforming petiton for review from Eagan Economic Development Authority Supreme Court 06/17/2009 Other Docket Notation Final
Objection – Costs and Disbursements Court of Appeals 06/08/2009 Objection Costs and Disbursements Final
Letter to Clerk of the Appellate Courts regarding clarification of Notice of Taxation of Costs. Court of Appeals 06/08/2009 Affidavit Service Final
Notice – Taxation of Costs Court of Appeals 06/03/2009 Notice Taxation of Costs Final
Opinion – Published Court of Appeals 05/19/2009 Opinion Published Final
Notice – Opinion Release Imminent Court of Appeals 05/14/2009 Notice Opinion Release Imminent Final
Event – Oral – Panel Court of Appeals 02/19/2009 Event Oral – Panel Final
Notice – Oral Argument Date Scheduled Court of Appeals 12/24/2008 Notice Oral Argument Date Scheduled Final
Event – Oral Panel – scheduled for 2/19/09, #200, 9:30 Court of Appeals 12/24/2008 Event Oral Panel – scheduled Final
Event – Orig. Court/Agency Files/Exhibits Received-BOX- Court of Appeals 10/10/2008 Event Orig. Court/Agency Files/Exhibits Received Final
Notice – Request Trial Court/Agency File Court of Appeals 09/26/2008 Notice Request Trial Court/Agency File Final
Brief – Reply Court of Appeals 09/23/2008 Brief Reply Final
Brief – Respondent; Eagan Economic Development Authority Court of Appeals 09/10/2008 Brief Respondent Final
Notice – Attorney Withdrawal – U-Haul & Americo Real Estate Co. Court of Appeals 08/15/2008 Notice Attorney Withdrawal or Substitution Final
Brief – Appellant Court of Appeals 08/12/2008 Brief Appellant Final
Order – Deny; the amount of supersedeas bond remanded to district court Court of Appeals 07/22/2008 Order Deny Final
Transcript – Delivery Certificate – Lois Schwelling Court of Appeals 07/09/2008 Transcript Delivery Certificate Final
Joint Reply – Response – Motion Court of Appeals 07/03/2008 Reply Other Final
Response – Motion (Respondent EDA) Court of Appeals 06/26/2008 Response Motion Final
Appellants’ Motion – for Review of Stay Orders Court of Appeals 06/20/2008 Motion Other Final
Letter – Respondent, American Accounts & Advisers, Inc., will not be filing a respondent’s brief. Court of Appeals 05/21/2008 Correspondence Incoming Final
Correspondence – Incoming Court of Appeals 05/20/2008 Correspondence Incoming Final
Transcript – Initial Certificate – Lois Schwelling Court of Appeals 05/19/2008 Transcript Initial Certificate Final
Statement – Case – Respondent Eagan Economic Development Authority Court of Appeals 05/12/2008 Statement Case – Respondent Final
Notice – Case Filing Court of Appeals 05/06/2008 Notice Case Filing Final
Statement – Case – Appellants Court of Appeals 05/02/2008 Statement Case – Appellant Final
Notice – Appeal – Case Filed; Order 4/16/08 Court of Appeals 05/02/2008 Notice Appeal – Case Filed Final

 

Post-Decision Civil Other 05/02/2008
1 to 3 of 3 records are displayed.         
Civil, Family & Probate Case Records Search Results  lEGAL NOTICE TO THE PUBLICPlease be so informed of Tim Kinley’s Court Hearing 25Jan2010 _ 62f196163(Cleary) Please send Appellate and Federal File Case NO’s for Research, Anyone having trouble with any Judges Listed: Help make the Courts Accountable, PDF Files must be scanned in URL for Public Scrunity, Fair,Impartial Justice.
Logout Search Menu New Civil Search  Search Criteria: 62f196163
Location : All MNCIS Sites – Case Search Help
Case Number Style Filed/Location/Judicial Officer Type/Status
62-F1-96-000163 BARBARA A. KINLEY vs.TIMOTHY C. KINLEY & Ramsey County, Intervenor [CHW REMOVED] [GWB RECUSED]{EFB REMOVED]** Box File ** [J&D 120997 FLINN J(CAF) 1031 218-239]
01/23/1996
Ramsey Family Main
Cleary, Edward J.
Dissolution with Child
Dormant
Logout Search Menu New Civil Search Back   
Location : All MNCIS Sites – Case Search Help
Register of Actions
Case No. 62-F1-96-000163
BARBARA A. KINLEY vs.TIMOTHY C. KINLEY & Ramsey County, Intervenor [CHW REMOVED] [GWB RECUSED]{EFB REMOVED]** Box File ** [J&D 120997 FLINN J(CAF) 1031 218-239] §
§
§
§
§
§
Case Type: Dissolution with Child
Date Filed: 01/23/1996
Location: Ramsey Family Main
Judicial Officer: Cleary, Edward J.
Party Information
 

Lead Attorneys

 

Intervenor

 

COUNTY OF RAMSEY
  ST PAUL, MN 55102
     
 

Petitioner

 

KINLEY, BARBARA A.
  OAKDALE, MN 55128
  08/19/1967 DUNN, TIMOTHY W J
  

Retained

 

 

Respondent

 

KINLEY, BARBARA A.
  OAKDALE, MN 55128
      Removed: 12/24/2007
      Ordered
  08/19/1967 DUNN, TIMOTHY W J
  

Retained

 

 

Respondent

 

KINLEY, BARBARA A.
  OAKDALE, MN 55128
      Removed: 12/24/2007
      Ordered
  08/19/1967 DUNN, TIMOTHY W J
  

Retained

 

 

Respondent

 

KINLEY, TIMOTHY C.
  MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109
  05/26/1958 CLARK, JILL ELEANOR
  

Retained

 

Events & Orders of the Court
      DISPOSITIONS
12/10/1997     Default (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding)

Converted Disposition:
 
Related Participants:
KINLEY, TIMOTHY C.
07/21/1998     Closed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding)

Monetary Award (Status: Expired, Debtor: TIMOTHY C. KINLEY, Entered: 07/21/1998, Docketed: 07/28/1998, 1:13 PM, Original Principal: $10,346.99)
05/20/2008     Closed at filing (Judicial Officer: Bastian, Gary W.)
02/09/2009     Judgment (Judicial Officer: Ostby, Elena L.)

Monetary Award (Status: Active, Debtor: TIMOTHY C. KINLEY, Entered: 02/09/2009, Original Principal: $500.00)
02/09/2009     Judgment (Judicial Officer: Ostby, Elena L.)

Monetary Award (Status: Active, Debtor: TIMOTHY C. KINLEY, Entered: 02/09/2009, Original Principal: $500.00)
02/09/2009     Judgment (Judicial Officer: Ostby, Elena L.)

Monetary Award (Status: Active, Debtor: TIMOTHY C. KINLEY, Entered: 02/09/2009, Docketed: 03/25/2009, 8:54 AM, Original Principal: $32,403.68)
       
      OTHER EVENTS AND HEARINGS
01/23/1996     Converted Filing Fee
01/23/1996     FLD-Case Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
01/23/1996     SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
02/16/1996     DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
02/23/1996     Converted Filing Fee
02/23/1996     CRP-Certificate of Representation (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
02/26/1996     DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
03/01/1996     Temporary Hearing  (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Yanish, Jo Anne M.)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

03/23/1996     RSI-Review for Scheduling Information (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
04/23/1996     RSO-Review for Scheduling Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
05/23/1996     DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
05/29/1996     NUL-Null Activity (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
05/30/1996     AJU-Adjudicated (Judicial Officer: Yanish, Jo Anne M. )
05/30/1996     DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
05/30/1996     ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
06/04/1996     DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
06/14/1996     DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
06/21/1996     RSO-Review for Scheduling Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
06/24/1996     DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
06/28/1996     DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
07/17/1996     DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
07/19/1996     DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
08/12/1996     FSF-Family Scheduling Form (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
08/13/1996     CANCELED   Scheduling Conference  (10:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Administrator, Conference)

Other
08/20/1996     ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
08/20/1996     SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
08/28/1996     DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
09/09/1996     ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
09/25/1996     DRV-ADR Status Review (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
09/25/1996     ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
09/26/1996     DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
11/18/1996     JAS-Judge Assignment (Judicial Officer: Flinn, Charles A., Jr )
11/18/1996     ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
11/18/1996     SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
11/18/1996     Pre-trial  (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Flinn, Charles A., Jr)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

12/06/1996     DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
01/03/1997     DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
01/06/1997     ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
01/07/1997     SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
01/27/1997     CANCELED   Hearing  (1:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Flinn, Charles A., Jr)

Other
02/18/1997     SPT-Schedule Pre-Trial (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
02/24/1997     CANCELED   Pre-trial  (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Flinn, Charles A., Jr)

Other
05/05/1997     DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
05/12/1997     Pre-trial  (1:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Flinn, Charles A., Jr)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

05/13/1997     DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
06/03/1997     SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
06/24/1997     SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
06/24/1997     Hearing  (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Flinn, Charles A., Jr)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

07/25/1997     Hearing  (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Flinn, Charles A., Jr)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

07/28/1997     SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
08/15/1997     SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
08/18/1997     Court Trial  (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Flinn, Charles A., Jr)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

08/19/1997     SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
08/19/1997     CANCELED   Hearing  (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Flinn, Charles A., Jr)

Other
09/08/1997     Hearing  (1:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Flinn, Charles A., Jr)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

12/09/1997     CLO-Closed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
12/09/1997     DCR-Decree (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
12/11/1997     DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
12/22/1997     DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
03/09/1998     ARC-Archive (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
03/23/1998     SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
04/13/1998     DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
04/13/1998     DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
04/17/1998     ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
04/27/1998     SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
04/28/1998     CANCELED   Hearing  (2:15 PM) (Judicial Officer Flinn, Charles A., Jr)

Other
05/15/1998     DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
05/20/1998     DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
05/21/1998     DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
05/22/1998     DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
05/26/1998     Hearing  (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Flinn, Charles A., Jr)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

07/13/1998     ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
07/21/1998     ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
07/28/1998     JDG-Entry of Judgment (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
07/31/1998     NOT-Notice (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
08/12/1998     ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
08/24/1998     ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
01/19/1999     SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
01/26/1999     DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
02/11/1999     SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
02/16/1999     CANCELED   Hearing  (2:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Flinn, Charles A., Jr)

Other
02/26/1999     SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
03/30/1999     CANCELED   Hearing  (2:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Flinn, Charles A., Jr)

Other
04/07/1999     DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
04/09/1999     DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
04/20/1999     Hearing  (10:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Flinn, Charles A., Jr)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

05/17/1999     ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
08/19/1999     DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
05/01/2000     DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
05/01/2000     POS-Proof of Service (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
05/01/2000     XPO-Expedited Process (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
06/08/2000     SUB-Submitted (Judicial Officer: Frias, Luz )
06/08/2000     Hearing  (1:15 PM) (Judicial Officer Frias, Luz)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

06/21/2000     AJU-Adjudicated (Judicial Officer: Frias, Luz )
06/22/2000     ORS-Child Support Order (Judicial Officer: Frias, Luz )
12/03/2001     SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
02/08/2002     RAS-Reassignment (Judicial Officer: Smith, Joanne M. )
02/08/2002     UAG-Unassigned-Agreement (Judicial Officer: Flinn, Charles A., Jr )
02/25/2002     NOT-Notice (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
03/04/2002     AFF-Affidavit (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
03/06/2002     NOT-Notice (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
03/11/2002     SUB-Submitted (Judicial Officer: Smith, Joanne M. )
03/11/2002     Hearing  (2:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Smith, Joanne M.)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

03/12/2002     DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
04/15/2002     AJU-Adjudicated (Judicial Officer: Smith, Joanne M. )
04/16/2002     ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
04/17/2002     LTR-Letters (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
04/22/2002     LTR-Letters (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
04/30/2002     MTN-Motion Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
04/30/2002     POS-Proof of Service (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
04/30/2002     XPO-Expedited Process (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
05/23/2002     NOT-Notice (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
06/04/2002     LTR-Letters (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
06/05/2002     LTR-Letters (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
06/12/2002     LTR-Letters (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
06/25/2002     UAG-Unassigned-Agreement (Judicial Officer: Smith, Joanne M. )
07/02/2002     RAS-Reassignment (Judicial Officer: VanDeNorth, John B., Jr. )
07/12/2002     NOT-Notice (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
07/12/2002     POS-Proof of Service (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
07/12/2002     SUB-Submitted (Judicial Officer: Wray, Tsippi )
07/12/2002     XPO-Expedited Process (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
07/12/2002     Hearing  (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Wray, Tsippi)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

07/13/2002     AJU-Adjudicated (Judicial Officer: Wray, Tsippi )
07/13/2002     ORS-Child Support Order (Judicial Officer: Wray, Tsippi )
07/16/2002     CANCELED   Hearing  (2:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Magistrate, Child Support)

Other
07/18/2002     NOT-Notice (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
07/29/2002     DCS-Dismiss Child Support (Judicial Officer: Frias, Luz )
07/11/2003     SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
08/26/2003     AFF-Affidavit (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
08/26/2003     MTN-Motion Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
08/27/2003     LTR-Letters (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
08/27/2003     RAS-Reassignment (Judicial Officer: DeCourcy, Michael T. )
08/27/2003     UAG-Unassigned-Agreement (Judicial Officer: VanDeNorth, John B., Jr. )
09/09/2003     CANCELED   Hearing  (1:30 PM) (Judicial Officer DeCourcy, Michael T.)

Other
12/01/2003     SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
12/02/2003     SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
12/05/2003     MTN-Motion Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
01/12/2004     CANCELED   Hearing  (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer DeCourcy, Michael T.)

Other
02/09/2004     MTN-Motion Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
02/17/2004     AFF-Affidavit (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
02/23/2004     Hearing  (10:00 AM) (Judicial Officer DeCourcy, Michael T.)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

04/15/2004     ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
04/19/2004     AJU-Adjudicated (Judicial Officer: DeCourcy, Michael T. )
04/19/2004     ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
04/30/2004     POS-Proof of Service (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
04/30/2004     XPO-Expedited Process (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
05/06/2004     RAS-Reassignment (Judicial Officer: Bastian, Gary W. )
05/06/2004     UAG-Unassigned-Agreement (Judicial Officer: DeCourcy, Michael T. )
06/08/2004     NOT-Notice (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
06/11/2004     ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
06/16/2004     SUB-Submitted (Judicial Officer: Moriarity, Michael )
06/16/2004     Hearing  (2:20 PM) (Judicial Officer Moriarity, Michael)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

07/08/2004     AJU-Adjudicated (Judicial Officer: Moriarity, Michael )
07/08/2004     ORS-Child Support Order (Judicial Officer: Moriarity, Michael )
08/09/2004     DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
08/10/2004     SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
08/15/2004     RVW-Case Status Review (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
11/09/2004     CANCELED   Hearing  (1:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Bastian, Gary W.)

Other
12/29/2004     DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
01/03/2005     AFF-Affidavit (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
01/06/2005     CANCELED   Hearing  (2:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Bastian, Gary W.)

Other
02/17/2005     POS-Proof of Service (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
02/17/2005     XPO-Expedited Process (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
03/04/2005     DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
03/10/2005     Hearing  (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Bastian, Gary W.)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

03/23/2005     AJU-Adjudicated (Judicial Officer: Anderson, Ronelle )
03/23/2005     ORS-Child Support Order (Judicial Officer: Anderson, Ronelle )
03/23/2005     SUB-Submitted (Judicial Officer: Anderson, Ronelle )
03/23/2005     Hearing  (10:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Anderson, Ronelle)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

04/18/2005     Hearing  (2:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Bastian, Gary W.)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

05/09/2005     SUB-Submitted (Judicial Officer: Bastian, Gary W. )
05/10/2005     DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
05/16/2005     SUB-Submitted (Judicial Officer: Bastian, Gary W. )
07/12/2005     CANCELED   Hearing  (10:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Bastian, Gary W.)

Other
08/08/2005     AJU-Adjudicated (Judicial Officer: Bastian, Gary W. )
08/08/2005     ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
08/12/2005     DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
08/12/2005     LTR-Letters (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
09/16/2005     SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
09/21/2005     MTN-Motion Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
10/07/2005     ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
11/02/2005     MTN-Motion Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
11/15/2005     CANCELED   Hearing  (2:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Bastian, Gary W.)

Other
11/18/2005     NOT-Notice (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
01/13/2006     DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
01/19/2006     Hearing  (3:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Bastian, Gary W.)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

02/03/2006     SUB-Submitted (Judicial Officer: Bastian, Gary W. )
02/22/2006     AJU-Adjudicated (Judicial Officer: Bastian, Gary W. )
02/22/2006     CLO-Closed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
02/22/2006     ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
02/28/2006     POS-Proof of Service (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
02/28/2006     XPO-Expedited Process (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
03/27/2006     POS-Proof of Service (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
03/27/2006     XPO-Expedited Process (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
03/28/2006     AJU-Adjudicated (Judicial Officer: Anderson, Ronelle )
03/28/2006     CLO-Closed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
03/28/2006     ORS-Child Support Order (Judicial Officer: Anderson, Ronelle )
03/28/2006     SUB-Submitted (Judicial Officer: Anderson, Ronelle )
03/28/2006     Hearing  (8:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Anderson, Ronelle)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

04/07/2006     MCC-Motion for Correct (Judicial Officer: Anderson, Ronelle )
04/07/2006     POS-Proof of Service (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
04/14/2006     DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
04/17/2006     SUB-Submitted (Judicial Officer: Anderson, Ronelle )
04/20/2006     DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
04/24/2006     AFF-Affidavit (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
04/24/2006     ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
04/26/2006     AJU-Adjudicated (Judicial Officer: Anderson, Ronelle )
04/26/2006     CLO-Closed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
04/26/2006     NUL-Null Activity (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
04/26/2006     ORS-Child Support Order (Judicial Officer: Anderson, Ronelle )
04/26/2006     ORS-Child Support Order (Judicial Officer: Anderson, Ronelle )
04/26/2006     SUB-Submitted (Judicial Officer: Anderson, Ronelle )
04/26/2006     Hearing  (10:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Anderson, Ronelle)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

05/15/2006     NOT-Notice (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
05/23/2006     NOA-Notice of Appeal (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
05/23/2006     ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
06/05/2006     ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
06/15/2006     RVW-Case Status Review (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
06/22/2006     ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
07/08/2006     CLO-Closed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
07/08/2006     CLO-Closed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
07/08/2006     NOT-Notice (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
07/10/2006     ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
08/24/2006     ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
08/30/2006     DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
08/30/2006     DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
08/30/2006     DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
09/13/2006     DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
09/13/2006     TSC-Transcript Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
09/15/2006     DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
09/15/2006     TSC-Transcript Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
10/16/2006     ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
10/17/2006     DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
10/17/2006     TSC-Transcript Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
10/27/2006     CLO-Closed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
10/27/2006     DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
11/20/2006     NOT-Notice (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
11/20/2006     POS-Proof of Service (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
12/11/2006     DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
12/11/2006     ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
12/13/2006     LTR-Letters (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
12/14/2006     NOT-Notice (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
12/14/2006     ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
12/18/2006     DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
12/18/2006     ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
12/19/2006     SUB-Submitted (Judicial Officer: Flynn, Mary H. C. )
12/19/2006     CANCELED   Hearing  (1:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Magistrate, Child Support)

Other
12/19/2006     Hearing  (1:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Flynn, Mary H. C.)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

01/02/2007     AJU-Adjudicated (Judicial Officer: Flynn, Mary H. C. )
01/02/2007     CLO-Closed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
01/02/2007     ORS-Child Support Order (Judicial Officer: Flynn, Mary H. C. )
01/16/2007     CANCELED   Hearing  (2:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Magistrate, Child Support)

Other
02/02/2007     DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
04/03/2007     NOT-Notice (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
05/23/2007     SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
06/11/2007     MTN-Motion Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
06/11/2007     OSC-Order to Show Cause (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
07/05/2007     NOT-Notice (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
07/11/2007     ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
07/16/2007     AFF-Affidavit (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
09/19/2007     Appellate Court Order
09/21/2007     Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel
09/21/2007     Affidavit of Service
09/24/2007     Affidavit-Other
09/25/2007     Hearing  (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Bastian, Gary W.)

09/25/2007 Reset by Court to 09/25/2007

Result: Held

09/27/2007     Order-Other (Judicial Officer: Bastian, Gary W. )
10/22/2007     Findings and Order (Judicial Officer: Bastian, Gary W. )
10/30/2007     Notice of Filing of Order
11/06/2007     Motion and Affidavit
11/07/2007     CANCELED   Motion Hearing  (10:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Bastian, Gary W.)

Other
11/16/2007     Appellate Court Order
11/20/2007     Order-Other (Judicial Officer: Johnson, Gregg E. )
12/11/2007     Other Document
12/21/2007     Order Discharging Guardian Ad Litem (Judicial Officer: Bastian, Gary W. )
12/24/2007     Notice of Case Filing
12/24/2007     Order Denying In Forma Pauperis Petition (Judicial Officer: Finley,John T. , )
12/24/2007     Affidavit for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis
12/24/2007     Motion
01/11/2008     Appellate Court Order
02/22/2008     Notice of Hearing
03/20/2008     Order-Other (Judicial Officer: Anderson, Russell A. )
04/17/2008     Notice of Hearing
05/06/2008     Order to Show Cause Hearing  (10:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Bastian, Gary W.)

Result: Held

05/12/2008     Notice of Case Filing
05/14/2008     Other Document
05/20/2008     Order-Other (Judicial Officer: Bastian, Gary W. )
05/22/2008     Notice for Implementation of Cost of Living Adjustment
05/23/2008     Appellate Court Order (Judicial Officer: Toussaint, Edward, Jr. )
06/03/2008     Notice of Case Assignment
06/12/2008     Notice to Remove (Judicial Officer: Beddow, Earl F., Jr. )
06/26/2008     Certificate on Notice of Removal/Affidavit of Prejudice (Judicial Officer: Beddow, Earl F., Jr. )
06/26/2008     Notice of Case Assignment
07/09/2008     Affidavit for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis
07/09/2008     Order for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis (Judicial Officer: Ostby, Elena L. )
07/15/2008     Notice of Motion and Affidavit
07/28/2008     Converted Pending Activity (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
08/28/2008     Notice of Hearing
11/05/2008     Affidavit-Other
11/05/2008     Other Document
11/05/2008     Affidavit of Service
11/10/2008     Order to Show Cause Hearing  (2:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Ostby, Elena L.)

11/10/2008 Reset by Court to 11/10/2008

Result: Held

11/10/2008     Taken Under Advisement (Judicial Officer: Ostby, Elena L. )
11/20/2008     Notice of Case Filing
11/20/2008     Correspondence
11/20/2008     Other Document
12/04/2008     Order Denying In Forma Pauperis Petition (Judicial Officer: Ostby, Elena L. )
12/04/2008     Affidavit for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis
12/11/2008     Appellate Court Order (Judicial Officer: Toussaint, Edward, Jr. )
01/13/2009     Notice of Hearing
02/02/2009     Affidavit-Other
02/02/2009     Affidavit of Service
02/03/2009     CANCELED   Order to Show Cause Hearing  (2:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Ostby, Elena L.)

Settled
02/03/2009 Reset by Court to 02/03/2009
02/09/2009     Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order (Judicial Officer: Ostby, Elena L. )
02/09/2009     Processed Judgment Entry
02/09/2009     Notice of Entry of Judgment
02/09/2009     Processed Judgment Entry
02/09/2009     Notice of Entry of Judgment
02/09/2009     Processed Judgment Entry
02/09/2009     Notice of Entry of Judgment
02/12/2009     Notice of Filing of Order
02/12/2009     Affidavit of Service
03/24/2009     Affidavit of Identification
03/25/2009     Processed Judgment Docketing
03/25/2009     Notice of Docketing of Judgment
04/14/2009     Order Denying In Forma Pauperis Petition (Judicial Officer: Ostby, Elena L. )
04/14/2009     Affidavit for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis
04/14/2009     Motion
04/15/2009     Notice of Case Filing
05/01/2009     Appellate Court Order (Judicial Officer: Toussaint, Edward, Jr. )
05/13/2009     Order Denying In Forma Pauperis Petition (Judicial Officer: Ostby, Elena L. )
05/13/2009     Motion
05/13/2009     Affidavit for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis
05/22/2009     Appellate Court Order (Judicial Officer: Toussaint, Edward, Jr. )
06/12/2009     Notice of Motion and Motion
06/12/2009     Affidavit-Other
06/12/2009     Affidavit of Service
06/17/2009     Notice-Other
06/26/2009     Notice of Hearing
08/31/2009     Affidavit-Other
08/31/2009     Affidavit of Service
09/02/2009     Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel
09/02/2009     Correspondence
09/03/2009     Motion Hearing  (1:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Cleary, Edward J.)

07/02/2009 Reset by Court to 07/02/2009
07/02/2009 Reset by Court to 09/03/2009

Result: Held

09/15/2009     Order-Other (Judicial Officer: Cleary, Edward J. )
09/15/2009     Other Document
09/15/2009     Order-Other (Judicial Officer: Cleary, Edward J. )
09/15/2009     Order-Other (Judicial Officer: Cleary, Edward J. )
09/15/2009     Warrant Issued
09/16/2009     Correspondence
09/16/2009     Affidavit of Service
09/29/2009     Notice of Filing of Order
09/29/2009     Affidavit of Service
10/07/2009     Correspondence
11/05/2009     Order-Other (Judicial Officer: Montgomery, Ann )
11/23/2009     Warrant Returned
11/25/2009     Order-Other (Judicial Officer: Cleary, Edward J. )
12/21/2009     Correspondence
12/21/2009     Notice of Appearance
12/21/2009     Motion
12/21/2009     Correspondence
12/24/2009     Notice-Other
01/25/2010     Motion Hearing  (10:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Cleary, Edward J.)

Financial Information
           
           
      Obligor KINLEY, TIMOTHY C.
      Total Financial Assessment  235.00
      Total Payments and Credits  235.00
      Balance Due as of 01/07/2010  0.00
             
11/07/2007     Transaction Assessment      55.00
11/07/2007     Counter Payment  Receipt # FM62-2007-01644  KINLEY, TIMOTHY C.  (55.00)
07/15/2008     Transaction Assessment      55.00
07/15/2008     Counter Payment  Receipt # FM62-2008-04419  KINLEY, TIMOTHY C.  (55.00)
04/09/2009     Transaction Assessment      20.00
04/09/2009     Counter Payment  Receipt # FM62-2009-02614  KINLEY, TIMOTHY C.  (20.00)
05/12/2009     Transaction Assessment      5.00
05/12/2009     Counter Payment  Receipt # FM62-2009-03566  KINLEY, TIMOTHY C.  (5.00)
12/24/2009     Transaction Assessment      100.00
12/24/2009     Mail Payment  Receipt # FM62-2009-09142  CLARK, JILL ELEANOR  (100.00)
             
           
           
      Petitioner KINLEY, BARBARA A.
      Total Financial Assessment  10.00
      Total Payments and Credits  10.00
      Balance Due as of 01/07/2010  0.00
             
04/29/2009     Transaction Assessment      10.00
04/29/2009     Counter Payment  Receipt # FM62-2009-03207  KINLEY, BARBARA A.  (10.00)
             

<!– –>
High-Profile and Multi-District Litigation Cases  Ramsey Co. District Court pdf Files while www.mncourts.gov does not>
In this section:

Text size:
reduce font size increase font size

2009 Unallotment Litigation:

62-CV-09-11693: 
Multiple Parties v. Governor of MN, et al

Documents

December 30, 2009
Motion for Temporary Restraining Order – Granted retroactive to 11/1/2009 – See Document
Amended Order – See Document

November 23, 2009
Affidavit of Service – See Document

November 20, 2009
Briefs – See Document
Affidavit – Other with Exhibits – See Document

November 17, 2009
Affidavit of Service -  See Document

November 16, 2009
Plaintiffs Reply Memo in Support of TRO -  See Document
Amended Class Action Complaint – See Document

November 12, 2009
Affidavit of Service – See Document
Affidavit Other with Exhibits MO – See Document
Affidavit Other with Exhibits PR = See Document
Defendants Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss – See Document
Defendants Memo. in Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion for TRO – See Document
Defendants Certifcate of Representation – See Document

November 6, 2009
Affidavit of Service - See Document
Affidavit of Service - See Document
Notice of Motion and Motion for Temproary Restraining Order  See Document
Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs Motion for Temporary Restraining Order  See Document

November 3, 2009
Affidavit of Service  - See Document
Summons and Complaint  – See Document
Certificate of Representation and Parties  See Document

 

 

Florida: Fraudulent Notices of Federal Tax Lien – a matter for the Statewide Grand Jury. – Lawmen | Google Groups State Court Administrator’s Office Sue Dosal
(651) 296-2474 (phone) (651) 297-5636 (fax)
Send an email via our contact form Minnesota Judicial Center (MJC)
Suite #: 135_25 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
FAX TRANSMITTAL   INFORMAL BRIEF QUITAM_RELATOR
 
 
                       Legal Published E-Service: Ed.Toussaint’sCovert OrderTitle18s1951 Ramsey Dist.Crt.File 62cv09-1163(Vandenorth) Appellate A09-2031(ToussaintSt. Paul, MN 5515 www.slideshare.com/sharon4anderson  and www.scribd.com/sharon4anderson
 
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY E-COMMERCE AND FAX:
      TO: Ramsey Co. Clerk of Court, Lynae.Olson@courts.state.mn.us tel:651-266-8255 F 266-8263 mary.jurek@courts.state.mn.us
          2nd Jud.Court Admin.            Larry.Dease@courts.state.mn.us       651-266-8266 F 266-8278
          Sheriff:                                  bob.fletcher@co.ramsey.mn.us          651-266-9333 F 266-9301
          Elections@co.ramsey.mn.us  mark.oswald@co.ramsey.mn.us        651-266-2171 F 266-2177
          Susan Gaertner rca@co.ramsey.mn.us  jean.stepan@co.ramsey.mn.us 266-3222 F 266-3010
          Lori Swanson MN_AG           attorney.general@state.mn.us             651-296-3353  F 282-2155
          St.Paul City Clerk                 shari.moore@ci.stpaul.mn.us               651-266-8688  F 266-8574
                                     and all others as their interest appear.
FROM:  Sharon4Mayor@aol.com   http://taxthemax.blogspot.com              651-776-5835
                      FAX VIA OUTGOING: SHARON CANNOT RECEIVE FAXES 
 
IN COURT APPEALS STATE OF MINNESOTA  
 A09-2031(Toussaint)-A06-1150(Russell Anderson)-C6-88-859(Huspenie) etal 62CV09-11693(Gearin) Ramsey Dist Crt. Example
Appellant-QuiTam-Relator Sharon4Anderson’s
Informal Brief pdf Format
  
 STATE OF MINNESOTA,ALL AGENCIES, REVENUE,Ward Einess COMMERCE, Glenn Wilson,PUBLIC SAFETY,Michael Campion,CITY ST.PAUL,Kathy Lantry,COUNTY RAMSEY,AUDITOR MARK OSWALD, Elections/Taxes Supervisor, Canvass Board,
State of Minnesota, Rule 24.04 by and thro State Attorney General Lori
Swanson
www.ag.state.mn.us, Michael Campion, Public Safety,Larry Dease,Court Administrator,St.Paul
Mayor Chris B. Coleman,City Clerk Shari Moore,Council President Kathy Lantry et al,
www.ci.stpaul.mn.us, Janice Rettman res: No 2009-012,Toni Carter Canvass Board
and County Commissioners,
www.co.ramsey.mn.us DSI Bob Kessler,Joel Essling
John Harrington Chief Police,his agents , Kathy Wuorinen,Don Luna,Tanya Hunter, Aaron Foster, Police Impound Lot, Rapid Towing  et al in
their Official Capacitys, Individually,Severally, acting in concort with John Doe
and Mary Roe.
SCAP,Judges Kathleen Gearin,Joanne Smith,Gregg
Johnson,Salvador Rosas,Larry Cohen et al, unk at this time  1988 Files 495722 499129 Default 66
Million Dollars.   In re Scarrella4 Assoc. Justice 221NW 2nd 562      Plaintiffs
V.

Page 53_697 SURREY AVE 32.29.22.41.0053$2,499.43
 St.Paul,MN.55106 ,Intestate Decedant James R. Anderson et al,
www.cpljimanderson.blogspot.com ,VA Widow,Senior,Disabled Political Activist
Sharon Anderson aka Peterson_Chergosky_Scarrella
www.sharon4staterep64a.blogspot.com http://sharon4council.blogspot.com
http://sharon4privateattorneygeneral.blogspot.com + 101 Blogs
www.sharon4anderson.org , et al as their interest appear , Defendants and
3rd Party Plaintiffs,Intestate Decedants Tenant in Common Wm.O and Bernice
A.Peterson.
 
 Title to Sharons Cars,Trailers,Peterbilt,Realestate in Fee Simple AbsoluteNotice: Ins.Claim Stolen 91 Chrysler V-1C4GY54R5MX597169                    Defendants: 3rd Party Plaintiffs    www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com

*  *   *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *
1.
Interpretation of a statute is a question of law, and an appellate court’s review is unlimited. Accordingly when determining a question of law, the appellate court is not bound by the trial court’s interpretation of a statute. or Denial of MN Const.Art.X and Separation of Powers Art. III
 
Affiants Answer/Cross 4 1/2 Million Dollars, overlooked,misapplied by Judge John Vandenorth
in a “Patterned Enterprise” of Judicial Fraud upon the Citizenery
 
 
2.
When construing a statute, a court should give words in common usage their natural and ordinary meaning. MS429.061
429.061, 2009 Minnesota Statutes
  Theft,Trespass,Treason is NOT IMPROVEMENT.
 

 

3.

 

The fundamental rule to which all other rules are subordinate is that the intent of the legislature governs if that intent can be ascertained. When language is plain and unambiguous, there is no need to resort to statutory construction. An appellate court merely interprets the language as it appears; it is not free to speculate and cannot read into the statute language not readily found there.
MS 645.Canons of Construction  Lower Court Vandenorth Treasonable Act’s
4.
If a city or county governing body has a two-thirds majority vote of its membership,  it may modify a recommendation from its planning commission without first returning the proposal to the commission.
or in MN Issues of MS609.43  Misconduct of Public Officials to exploit the Seniors,Elderly,Vunerable Homeowners
in their Bizzare Taxing Methods of Illegal Fees/Assessments by Theft,Trespass,Treason? in this RICO Case for over 25 years…..re: C6-88-859 (Doris Huspeni) with Clerk Chris Coleman, now City St.Paul Mayor.
5.
Under the facts of this case, the Board of County Commissioners’  alleged Administrative Hearing without “due process” or Civil/Criminal S&C triggering Constitutional Challenge of Jurisdiction/Authority of Judge John Vandenorth File 62cv09-1163,amendment’s published 2008 Tax Delinquency’s  was a legislative action.
Quitam Relator Sharon4Anderson is the only homeowner to challenge out of 3 thousand propertys?
giving rise to Major Corruption in the State of Minnesota,City of St.Paul and County of Ramsey
 
  
6.
Aesthetics and conformance with a governing body’s comprehensive plan may be considered as bases for zoning and Tax  rulings.
42 USC 3631 
7.
Zoning is not to be based upon a plebiscite of the neighbors; neighborhood objections alone are not legally sufficient to support land use regulation. Nevertheless, their views remain a consideration in a governing body’s ultimate decision.
8.
A county-wide ”takings” “Condemnations” by Water,Electric Shutoff , Stalking causing Fractured Ankle, taking 91 Chrysler, Trailer, Contents, Porta Potty by Theft, Trespass,Treason since 1988 Ramsey Dist. File 495722  and 66 Million Default Judgment File no 499129 giving rise to AFFIDAVITS OF PREJUDICE AGAINST NOW CHIEFAffidavitPrejudice Kathleen Gearin Judge
  JUDGE KATHLEEN GEARINSCAP
IN her capacity-conflict as Commitment Judge, triggering DEATH,DISABILITY,DISPARAGMENT OF TITLES AND  
 on all  citizens in a “protected class” of Social Security Receipants, Disability, in the instant case is  unreasonable per se and therefore improper. Summary Judgment taken without
Evidentary Hearings, List of Witness’s
 
62CV-09-11693
Amicus 20brief 9.
The district court is vested with broad discretion in supervising the course and scope of discovery.
10.
In actions to review the final zoning decision of a governing body, the admission of evidence not presented to the governing body is subject to the district court’s discretion.
11.
Although strongly encouraged, a governing body is not required to make formal findings of fact concerning its decisions regulating land use. It is more important that there exists a record of what the governing body considered before making its decision so that the reviewing court is not left in a quandary as to why the decision was made.
12.
 The test for determining whether a state law violates the Contract Clause of the United States Constitution is: (1) whether the state law has, in fact, operated as a substantial impairment of a contractual relationship; (2) whether there is a significant
and legitimate public purpose behind the legislation; and (3) whether the adjustment of the contracting parties’ rights and responsibilities is based upon reasonable conditions and is of a character appropriate to the public purpose justifying the legislation’s adoption.
13.
Despite a court finding of substantial impairment of a contractual relationship, legislation may still be upheld under an analysis of the Contract Clause of the United States Constitution if there is a significant and legitimate public purpose behind the legislation and if the adjustments to the contracting parties’ rights and responsibilities are based upon reasonable conditions and are of a character appropriate to the public purpose justifying the legislation’s adoption.
14.
For the threshold issue in an analysis of the Contract Clause of the United States Constitution—whether the regulation has, in fact, operated as a substantial impairment of a contractual relationship—a court must consider whether the industry the complaining party has entered has been regulated in the past. This consideration is required because one whose rights, such as they are, are subject to state restriction, cannot remove them from the power of the State by making a contract about them.
15.
In an analysis of the Contract Clause of the United States Constitution, whether the adjustment of rights and responsibilities of contracting parties is based upon reasonable conditions and is of a character appropriate to the public purpose justifying the legislation’s adoption, the courts properly defer to legislative judgment as to the necessity and reasonableness of a particular measure when the State is not a contracting party.
16.
An appellate court review of whether a board of county commissioners’ resolution is preempted by statute is, like interpretation of statutes and ordinances, a question of law. The standard of review is therefore unlimited.
17.
State law preemption of a particular field cannot be implied but must be expressed by a clear statement in the law.
18.
There is a presumption that the legislature does not intend to enact useless or meaningless legislation.
19.
Absent an express statement by Congress that state law is preempted, federal preemption occurs where (1) there is an actual conflict between federal and state law; (2) where compliance with both federal and state law is, in effect, physically impossible; (3) where Congress has occupied the entire field of regulation and leaves no room for states to supplement federal law; or (4) when the state law stands as an obstacle to the accomplishment and execution of the full objectives of Congress.
20.
In the absence of express preemption in a federal law, there is a strong presumption that Congress did not intend to displace state law.
APPELLANT_QUITAM_RELATOR SHARED ISSUES:

1. Did the district court err in determining that the City Council and Ramsey Co. Board’s decision “takings” by Theft,Trespass,Treason without Improvements on Homestead, Disabled Property Owners, amending the taxing regulations by Illegal Fees/Assessment, Summary Abatements without “due process” was lawful, i.e., that it did violate the
2. Did the district court err  with Libel with Malice in determining that the  Full Taxes of   Homestead Property at 697 Surrey, 2008 were paid and that Title is in the name of Decedant James R. Anderson et al and
decision amending the online banking statement of regulations was reasonable?
Property taxes paid  $949.86 Property taxes paid
 

 

 
 
  
No.4. Did the district court err in dismissing the claim alleging that the property taxes for 697 Surrey 2008 were paid in full?  Judge John Vandenorty complicity with Auditor Mark Oswald to violate the Contract Clause of the United States Constitution? YES.
 ISSUES:
5. Did the district court CRIMINALLY err  by having a Student Attorney who failed to research the Case in its entirety alleging preemption of the Bank and Wire Fraud regulation’s amendment by Fraud unpon the Court and Fraud on the United States of America on a Protected Class of Citizens. Techinally Repealing State Laws thus Treason  YES.
  
6. Did the district court err in dismissing  Attorney Pro Se’s pdf. Forensic Files to expose Major Corruption of the Judgescomplicit with Auditor, and DFL Gubnatorial Cadidate, Ramsey Co Attorney Susan Gaertner who is claiming  alleging preemption of the Banking laws and regulation amendments by federal law?  YES
Memorandumn
 
  
Concurrent with the release of A09-2031 Order (toussaint)  court has ordered Affiant to submit Informal brief on certain questions raised in the issues originally presented on appeal by both Plaintiff State of Minnesota  and Respondant.
  
 Those original issues are: whether the district court erred in  Summary Judgment dismissing the claims alleging that the taxing  decision’s  amending the  regulations violated the Takings Clause and the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. YES.
  
Minnesota’s Strike Force  “taking” our Cars for Profit, involving Aaron Foster, Manager of
St.Paul Police Impound Lot, without Public Improvements, taxing to forclosure
without Tickets,Warrants,Approval to Prosecute
  
 

                                        
Bill Dahn: USDist02-0332(Rosenbaum)(FIAFEA&FIRREA)
LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299
telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Sharon4 Anderson – Google Profile Candidate AG2010 www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com Blogger: User Profile: Sharon Anderson

 

 

Bill Dahn: Bud Shaver Stole Bill’sCampaign Bus?
Our order requiring supplemental briefing on takings necessarily stays our resolution of the following issues originally presented on appeal by Intervenors: whether the district court erred in dismissing their claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) and inverse condemnation.
FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT AT THIS TIME
EXCEPT ACCESS TO THE COURTS MUST BE IN PDF FORMAT, FORENSIC FILES FOR PUBLIC
SCRUNITY.
 

These Criminal Charges against the State do not have to have Filing Fees,

                                           Wed. 23Dec09

 AFFIDAVIT OF E:SERVICE:BYSHARON SCARRELLA ANDERSON, ATTORNEY PRO SE,QUITAM
  TO: The Above named :Sue Dosal,Staff,Court Employees  in their Official Capacities, Severally, Individually, John Doe and Mary Roe. State Court Administrator’s Office

 

AFFIANT:  Sharon reserves the Right to Quo Warranto re: Toussaints Order dtd.7Dec09  A09-2031 to join with A06-1150 re: My Presentations on SlideShare RICO Charges.
Sue
Sue Dosal,
State Court Administrator
Sue Dosal serves as the State Court Administrator of the Minnesota Judicial State Court Administrator’s Office Branch.  She was appointed to this position on July 16, 1982. Prior to her appointment she served as Senior Staff Attorney for the National Center for State Courts, Deputy State Court Administrator for the state of Florida, Staff Director of the Florida Legislature’s Joint Select Committee on Judicial Personnel,       AFFIANTS NOTE:

 
Florida: Fraudulent Notices of Federal Tax Lien – a matter for the Statewide Grand Jury. – Lawmen | Google Groups State Court Administrator’s Office
(651) 296-2474 (phone)
(651) 297-5636 (fax)
Send an email via our contact form

Minnesota Judicial Center (MJC)
Suite #: 135
25 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 5515

 

  Legal Published E-Service: Ed.Toussaint’sCovert OrderTitle18s1951 Ramsey Dist.Crt.File 62cv09-1163(Vandenorth) Appellate A09-2031(Toussaint)
  FAX TRANSMITTAL  Resubmit Sat.19Dec09 23Dec09  
  AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY E-COMMERCE AND FAX:SHARON ANDERSON CHARGES MARK OSWALD and others  

 

 

 

                                                   COUNT I  Title 18 sec.1951  HRA charging off Loan to Selective Contractors ie: Sherman Associates.
 
                                                    COUNT II Title 26 sec 1602 Tax Credits
 
                                    COUNT III  Loan Forgiveness re: MN Const. Art X.     
 
                                     COUNT IV  RICO Pattern of HRA  and City’s Bizzare Taxing Scheme, contrary to MN Constitution,  and State Crim Code MS 609.xx
                                                609 – CRIMINAL CODE, 2009 Minnesota Statutes
 
 
                               “taking” without Public Hearing.
  
                           Relator admits to Published Order by Chief Appellate Judge Edward Toussaint  dtd.7Dec09, Affiant found Published today.
                               www.slideshare.com/sharon4anderson 
  
Florida: Fraudulent Notices of Federal Tax Lien – a matter for the Statewide Grand Jury. – Lawmen | Google Groups US CODE: Title 18,1030. Fraud and related activity in connection with computers
      TO: Ramsey Co. Clerk of Court, Lynae.Olson@courts.state.mn.us tel:651-266-8255 F 266-8263 mary.jurek@courts.state.mn.us
          2nd Jud.Court Admin.            Larry.Dease@courts.state.mn.us       651-266-8266 F 266-8278
          Sheriff:                                  bob.fletcher@co.ramsey.mn.us          651-266-9333 F 266-9301
          Elections@co.ramsey.mn.us  mark.oswald@co.ramsey.mn.us        651-266-2171 F 266-2177
          Susan Gaertner rca@co.ramsey.mn.us  jean.stepan@co.ramsey.mn.us 266-3222 F 266-3010
          Lori Swanson MN_AG           attorney.general@state.mn.us             651-296-3353  F 282-2155
          St.Paul City Clerk                 shari.moore@ci.stpaul.mn.us               651-266-8688  F 266-8574
                                     and all others as their interest appear.
FROM:  Sharon4Mayor@aol.com   http://taxthemax.blogspot.com              651-776-5835
 
 
 
                      FAX VIA OUTGOING: SHARON CANNOT RECEIVE FAXES 
CANDIDATE AttorneyGeneral  www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com  SHARON ANDERSON CHARGES MARK OSWALD and others
WITH TITLE 18S1030 RE: Taxes/Elections, Challenges the City St.Paul,MN Agenda 23Dec09 in its Entirety

 

 42 USC 3631 MS 2.724 Disclaimer: Sharon has been reduced to Poverty, QuiTam Whistleblower  In Fact her new Medicare now “takes” 140.10 for Insurance and 14.40 for Prescriptions?

   
 

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299

 

 

telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Sharon4 Anderson – Google Profile Candidate AG2010 www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com Blogger: User Profile: Sharon Anderson
 

 

Legal Notice to the State of MN, Revenue,All Agencies, County of Ramsey,Mark.Oswald,Risk Management,Land Acquistion et al,City St.Paul,Mayor Coleman,DSI Bob Kessler,Joel Essling,Risk Management Ron.Guilfoile,HRA,Kathy Lantry,City Council enbanc,Shari.Moore Clerk,Marcia Moermond et al
East Side Review News alleged to be Tax Delinquent. 62cv09-1163
Interesting MN Court Administrator Sue Dosal Husband former MN Fed. Court Clerk
with “Tys” to Florida
re:
  

Group: http://groups.google.com/group/lawmen/topics

    “Bob Hurt” <bob@bobhurt.com> Dec 22 07:22PM -0500 ^
     
    Remedies for Fraudulent Notices of Federal Tax Lien in Florida
     
     
    Florida Statutes <http://leg.state.fl.us/Statutes> provide possible remedies for fraudulent notices of tax lien.
      
    28.222 requires the clerk to KNOW US LAW regarding federal tax liens and levies and to record federal tax liens ONLY if made in accordance with that law. The clerks don’t know anything about US law, and the county attorneys falsely inform them from IRS booklets made just to suborn clerks. You could point out that a lien notice has no validity unless a duly authorized assessment officer signed (under penalties of perjury) the assessment that forms the basis for the lien. I have NEVER seen such an assessment document signed under penalties of perjury that it is a bona fide and accurate assessment of taxes owed, due, and payable
      
    713.31 – Remedies for fraud and collusion – worth looking at – treble damages.
     

     
    713.901 (4) requires the certification of notices of liens (see IRS 7806 and 6065 and examine any lien notice for proper certification) by a “responsible” person (where’s the proof that the submitter is responsible to collect taxes and has a delegation of authority to perform that function?). Clerks never verify credentials of submitters or certification of the notice.
     
     
    Filing of Recorded Notices of Federal Tax Lien
     
     
    A lien notice is not a lien. The Clerk should file ONLY ACTUAL liens in the system of records reserved for liens. The Clerk should NOT file Notices in the Liens system. If the IRS does not like this, it can start creating paper liens, not invisible ones that it claims exist but really don’t. If it isn’t written, it isn’t true.
     
     
    Statewide Grand Jury
     
     
    IMO the clerk engages in racketeering with the IRS across multiple circuits throughout the state. Right now the Governor has empaneled (or will empanel) a Statewide Grand Jury. You should file an evidence package about this crime and demand SGJ investigation.
     

     
    —————————————————————————————–
     
    BobHurtSuit200707small <http://bobhurt.com/> Bob Hurt
    2460 Persian Drive #70
    Clearwater, FL 33763
    +1 (727) 669-5511
    Donate to my <http://bobhurt.com/lawdonation.htm> Law Scholarship fund
    Learn civil litigation with <http://www.jurisdictionary.com/index.asp?refercode=HB0002> Jurisdictionary
    Subscribe to <http://bobhurt.com/subscribetolawmen.htm> Lawmen Newsletter FREE
    Download <http://groups.google.com/group/lawmen/files> Files FREE from the Lawmen <http://groups.google.com/group/lawmen> Archive
    Improve your financial fortunes with <http://www.getzooks.biz/index.php?aff=bobhurt> GetZooks!
    <http://www.fuelsaver-mpg.com/affiliates/jrox.php?id=145_1_tlid_8_MailFoot> Save Fuel
     
    —————————————————————————————–
     

    “Bob Hurt” <bob@bobhurt.com> Dec 22 12:52PM -0500 ^
     
    Tom Cryer has filed a lawsuit (see below press release) against Rebecca O’Dell for defaming him in comments she made to subscribers of the St. Pete area Constitution Party meetup group. When I saw her comments, seemingly timed to coincide with Tommy’s upcoming Tea Party Squared tour of 7 Florida cities, I felt shocked because 1) they did not constitute truth, and 2) they seemed so atypical of an attorney because of their libelous nature.
      
    I forwarded them to Tommy. He wrote a correction to Rebecca and told her, effectively, that if she’d find laws making people liable, he’d let her off the hook. She published a partial-correction letter to her readers, but she otherwise spurned his mercy. So, he sued.
      
    The lawsuit does not please me, but then neither have I felt pleased about Rebecca’s intransigent attitude about the implementation of income tax in America, nor her attack on Tommy. And, Tommy should protect his reputation.
     

     
    She told me repeatedly that she did not like income tax, but that the courts say we all have to pay it, and we need to do that and take up the issue with Congress. I told her that the income tax as implemented violates Article I Section 2 Clause 3 and Section 9 Clause 4 of the US Constitution. She seemed to think that since the lower courts have ruled thousands of times in favor of the IRS , they must be right.
     

     
    Rebecca wrote me, in effect, that if she believed me, stopped paying tax as a consequence, and the IRS attacked her and prevailed against her, she’d sue me for damages for misleading her. She seemed pretty hostile about all the anti-income-tax gurus causing so many people to lose fortunes to the IRS and losing liberty to the courts.
     

     
    I guess that hostility spilled over onto Tom Cryer when I sent her his memorandum. She must have thought him one of the anti-income-tax gurus who tells people to stop filing and stop paying. But Tom has repeatedly explained, effectively, that such an action constitutes financial suicidal, and we can only prevail in that if many millions of Americans do it at the same time. Tom has said that we must work together on ALL FRONTS of activism, politically, socially, legally, and financially, to attack and defeat IRS abuses and the courts and politicians who support them.
     

     
    For several years I have advocated out and out legal attacks against IRS agents who abuse individuals – find the IRS agent errors, then demand correction, and failing correction, sue them and file administrative and criminal complaints against them. If EVERYBODY did this, IRS abuses would stop. Unfortunately, most people take Rebecca’s position and cave in to them without a fight.
     

     
    ——————————————————————————————————
     
    <http://bobhurt.com/> Bob Hurt • <http://bobhurt.com/subscribetolawmen.htm> Lawmen • <http://groups.google.com/group/lawmen/files> Files • <http://groups.google.com/group/lawmen> Archive • <http://bobhurt.com/lawdonation.htm> Scholarship • <http://www.jurisdictionary.com/index.asp?refercode=HB0002> Jurisdictionary • <http://www.getzooks.biz/index.php?aff=bobhurt> GetZooks!
     
    ——————————————————————————————————
     

     
    From: Tom Cryer
    Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 1:48 AM
    To: undisclosed-recipients:
    Subject: Update
     

     
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
     

     
    INTERNET DIATRIBE
     
    LANDS FLORIDA EMAILER IN COURT
     

     
    SHREVEPORT, LA—In a law suit filed by Louisiana attorney Tommy K. Cryer a Florida woman is being taken to task for distributing an email containing what Cryer’s suit alleges is a string of false and defamatory claims. According to the law suit filed in Shreveport, Louisiana, Rebecca O’Dell Townsend, a St. Petersburg, FL, attorney, published and distributed emails falsely accusing Cryer of being a disbarred tax evader who does not believe there is any such thing as a federal individual income tax.
     

     
    Cryer, who has been in uninterrupted law practice in Louisiana for over 36 years and who was cleared of tax evasion and willful failure to file charges by a unanimous “not guilty” jury verdict, says “I have no idea what prompted Townsend to fabricate and publish the false statements. Call me old fashioned, but I don’t understand why some people feel compelled to lie.”
     

     
    At the time Truth Attack (www.truthattack.org), a non-profit political action organization, which Cryer founded and heads up and whose stated mission is “putting the government back in its box—one tentacle at a time,” was in the process of promoting and conducting seminars for tea party and other political activists on what they called “The Lost Art of Citizenry”. The seminars offered instruction on how to organize and coordinate group activities, how to learn about our rights and government’s limitations, ways to distribute information to the public and inside information on how to influence representatives’ and government officials’ actions.
     

     
    Barely a week before the seven seminars were to begin Townsend published and distributed a blistering mass emailing that was distributed widely across the internet, stating that Cryer was a disbarred tax evader who contended that there is no such thing as a federal individual income tax and that Cryer and those associated with him “have left a wake of destroyed families in their wake.” Cryer said “I am not nor have I ever been disbarred, I am not a tax evader and have never destroyed a family in my life, let alone a ‘wake of families’, whatever that means.”
     

     
    Now Cryer has filed suit in Shreveport seeking damages for defamation. Cryer said “I don’t know this woman and have never heard of her before. I don’t know why she made up and published all these lies about me and my organization, but I will not sit idly by while someone attempts to destroy an unsullied reputation I have spent a lifetime in building.”
     

     
    Source: Truth Attack
     
    Contact: Jim Kerr, 318 795-2030
     
    hq@truthattack.org
     
    Interviews available on request
     

 


You received this because you have membership in the “Lawmen” Google Group.
Comment to group owner – reply to the message (only the owner posts messages).
See the archives, change options – visit http://groups.google.com/group/Lawmen
Join / Subscribe – send email to Lawmen+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Resign / Unsubscribe- send email to Lawmen+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

 

 

 

 

 
   
 

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299

 

 

telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Sharon4 Anderson – Google Profile Candidate AG2010 www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com Blogger: User Profile: Sharon Anderson
 

 

Legal Notice to the State of MN, Revenue,All Agencies, County of Ramsey,Mark.Oswald,Risk Management,Land Acquistion et al,City St.Paul,Mayor Coleman,DSI Bob Kessler,Joel Essling,Risk Management Ron.Guilfoile,HRA,Kathy Lantry,City Council enbanc,Shari.Moore Clerk,Marcia Moermond et al
East Side Review News alleged to be Tax Delinquent. 62cv09-1163
Interesting MN Court Administrator Sue Dosal Husband former MN Fed. Court Clerk
with “Tys” to Florida
re:
  

Group: http://groups.google.com/group/lawmen/topics

    “Bob Hurt” <bob@bobhurt.com> Dec 22 07:22PM -0500 ^
     
    Remedies for Fraudulent Notices of Federal Tax Lien in Florida
     
     
    Florida Statutes <http://leg.state.fl.us/Statutes> provide possible remedies for fraudulent notices of tax lien.
      
    28.222 requires the clerk to KNOW US LAW regarding federal tax liens and levies and to record federal tax liens ONLY if made in accordance with that law. The clerks don’t know anything about US law, and the county attorneys falsely inform them from IRS booklets made just to suborn clerks. You could point out that a lien notice has no validity unless a duly authorized assessment officer signed (under penalties of perjury) the assessment that forms the basis for the lien. I have NEVER seen such an assessment document signed under penalties of perjury that it is a bona fide and accurate assessment of taxes owed, due, and payable
      
    713.31 – Remedies for fraud and collusion – worth looking at – treble damages.
     

     
    713.901 (4) requires the certification of notices of liens (see IRS 7806 and 6065 and examine any lien notice for proper certification) by a “responsible” person (where’s the proof that the submitter is responsible to collect taxes and has a delegation of authority to perform that function?). Clerks never verify credentials of submitters or certification of the notice.
     
     
    Filing of Recorded Notices of Federal Tax Lien
     
     
    A lien notice is not a lien. The Clerk should file ONLY ACTUAL liens in the system of records reserved for liens. The Clerk should NOT file Notices in the Liens system. If the IRS does not like this, it can start creating paper liens, not invisible ones that it claims exist but really don’t. If it isn’t written, it isn’t true.
     
     
    Statewide Grand Jury
     
     
    IMO the clerk engages in racketeering with the IRS across multiple circuits throughout the state. Right now the Governor has empaneled (or will empanel) a Statewide Grand Jury. You should file an evidence package about this crime and demand SGJ investigation.
     

     
    —————————————————————————————–
     
    BobHurtSuit200707small <http://bobhurt.com/> Bob Hurt
    2460 Persian Drive #70
    Clearwater, FL 33763
    +1 (727) 669-5511
    Donate to my <http://bobhurt.com/lawdonation.htm> Law Scholarship fund
    Learn civil litigation with <http://www.jurisdictionary.com/index.asp?refercode=HB0002> Jurisdictionary
    Subscribe to <http://bobhurt.com/subscribetolawmen.htm> Lawmen Newsletter FREE
    Download <http://groups.google.com/group/lawmen/files> Files FREE from the Lawmen <http://groups.google.com/group/lawmen> Archive
    Improve your financial fortunes with <http://www.getzooks.biz/index.php?aff=bobhurt> GetZooks!
    <http://www.fuelsaver-mpg.com/affiliates/jrox.php?id=145_1_tlid_8_MailFoot> Save Fuel
     
    —————————————————————————————–
     

    “Bob Hurt” <bob@bobhurt.com> Dec 22 12:52PM -0500 ^
     
    Tom Cryer has filed a lawsuit (see below press release) against Rebecca O’Dell for defaming him in comments she made to subscribers of the St. Pete area Constitution Party meetup group. When I saw her comments, seemingly timed to coincide with Tommy’s upcoming Tea Party Squared tour of 7 Florida cities, I felt shocked because 1) they did not constitute truth, and 2) they seemed so atypical of an attorney because of their libelous nature.
      
    I forwarded them to Tommy. He wrote a correction to Rebecca and told her, effectively, that if she’d find laws making people liable, he’d let her off the hook. She published a partial-correction letter to her readers, but she otherwise spurned his mercy. So, he sued.
      
    The lawsuit does not please me, but then neither have I felt pleased about Rebecca’s intransigent attitude about the implementation of income tax in America, nor her attack on Tommy. And, Tommy should protect his reputation.
     

     
    She told me repeatedly that she did not like income tax, but that the courts say we all have to pay it, and we need to do that and take up the issue with Congress. I told her that the income tax as implemented violates Article I Section 2 Clause 3 and Section 9 Clause 4 of the US Constitution. She seemed to think that since the lower courts have ruled thousands of times in favor of the IRS , they must be right.
     

     
    Rebecca wrote me, in effect, that if she believed me, stopped paying tax as a consequence, and the IRS attacked her and prevailed against her, she’d sue me for damages for misleading her. She seemed pretty hostile about all the anti-income-tax gurus causing so many people to lose fortunes to the IRS and losing liberty to the courts.
     

     
    I guess that hostility spilled over onto Tom Cryer when I sent her his memorandum. She must have thought him one of the anti-income-tax gurus who tells people to stop filing and stop paying. But Tom has repeatedly explained, effectively, that such an action constitutes financial suicidal, and we can only prevail in that if many millions of Americans do it at the same time. Tom has said that we must work together on ALL FRONTS of activism, politically, socially, legally, and financially, to attack and defeat IRS abuses and the courts and politicians who support them.
     

     
    For several years I have advocated out and out legal attacks against IRS agents who abuse individuals – find the IRS agent errors, then demand correction, and failing correction, sue them and file administrative and criminal complaints against them. If EVERYBODY did this, IRS abuses would stop. Unfortunately, most people take Rebecca’s position and cave in to them without a fight.
     

     
    ——————————————————————————————————
     
    <http://bobhurt.com/> Bob Hurt • <http://bobhurt.com/subscribetolawmen.htm> Lawmen • <http://groups.google.com/group/lawmen/files> Files • <http://groups.google.com/group/lawmen> Archive • <http://bobhurt.com/lawdonation.htm> Scholarship • <http://www.jurisdictionary.com/index.asp?refercode=HB0002> Jurisdictionary • <http://www.getzooks.biz/index.php?aff=bobhurt> GetZooks!
     
    ——————————————————————————————————
     

     
    From: Tom Cryer
    Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 1:48 AM
    To: undisclosed-recipients:
    Subject: Update
     

     
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
     

     
    INTERNET DIATRIBE
     
    LANDS FLORIDA EMAILER IN COURT
     

     
    SHREVEPORT, LA—In a law suit filed by Louisiana attorney Tommy K. Cryer a Florida woman is being taken to task for distributing an email containing what Cryer’s suit alleges is a string of false and defamatory claims. According to the law suit filed in Shreveport, Louisiana, Rebecca O’Dell Townsend, a St. Petersburg, FL, attorney, published and distributed emails falsely accusing Cryer of being a disbarred tax evader who does not believe there is any such thing as a federal individual income tax.
     

     
    Cryer, who has been in uninterrupted law practice in Louisiana for over 36 years and who was cleared of tax evasion and willful failure to file charges by a unanimous “not guilty” jury verdict, says “I have no idea what prompted Townsend to fabricate and publish the false statements. Call me old fashioned, but I don’t understand why some people feel compelled to lie.”
     

     
    At the time Truth Attack (www.truthattack.org), a non-profit political action organization, which Cryer founded and heads up and whose stated mission is “putting the government back in its box—one tentacle at a time,” was in the process of promoting and conducting seminars for tea party and other political activists on what they called “The Lost Art of Citizenry”. The seminars offered instruction on how to organize and coordinate group activities, how to learn about our rights and government’s limitations, ways to distribute information to the public and inside information on how to influence representatives’ and government officials’ actions.
     

     
    Barely a week before the seven seminars were to begin Townsend published and distributed a blistering mass emailing that was distributed widely across the internet, stating that Cryer was a disbarred tax evader who contended that there is no such thing as a federal individual income tax and that Cryer and those associated with him “have left a wake of destroyed families in their wake.” Cryer said “I am not nor have I ever been disbarred, I am not a tax evader and have never destroyed a family in my life, let alone a ‘wake of families’, whatever that means.”
     

     
    Now Cryer has filed suit in Shreveport seeking damages for defamation. Cryer said “I don’t know this woman and have never heard of her before. I don’t know why she made up and published all these lies about me and my organization, but I will not sit idly by while someone attempts to destroy an unsullied reputation I have spent a lifetime in building.”
     

     
    Source: Truth Attack
     
    Contact: Jim Kerr, 318 795-2030
     
    hq@truthattack.org
     
    Interviews available on request
     

 


You received this because you have membership in the “Lawmen” Google Group.
Comment to group owner – reply to the message (only the owner posts messages).
See the archives, change options – visit http://groups.google.com/group/Lawmen
Join / Subscribe – send email to Lawmen+subscribe@googlegroups.com

 

 

 

  LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299  
 

Legal Notice to the State of MN, Revenue,All Agencies, County of Ramsey,Mark.Oswald,Risk Management,Land Acquistion et al,City St.Paul,Mayor Coleman,DSI Bob Kessler,Joel Essling,Risk Management Ron.Guilfoile,HRA,Kathy Lantry,City Council enbanc,Shari.Moore Clerk,Marcia Moermond et al
East Side Review News alleged to be Tax Delinquent. 62cv09-1163
Interesting MN Court Administrator Sue Dosal Husband former MN Fed. Court Clerk
with “Tys” to Florida

    “Bob Hurt” <bob@bobhurt.com> Dec 22 07:22PM -0500 ^
     
    Remedies for Fraudulent Notices of Federal Tax Lien in Florida
     
     
    Florida Statutes <http://leg.state.fl.us/Statutes> provide possible remedies for fraudulent notices of tax lien.
      
    28.222 requires the clerk to KNOW US LAW regarding federal tax liens and levies and to record federal tax liens ONLY if made in accordance with that law. The clerks don’t know anything about US law, and the county attorneys falsely inform them from IRS booklets made just to suborn clerks. You could point out that a lien notice has no validity unless a duly authorized assessment officer signed (under penalties of perjury) the assessment that forms the basis for the lien. I have NEVER seen such an assessment document signed under penalties of perjury that it is a bona fide and accurate assessment of taxes owed, due, and payable
      
    713.31 – Remedies for fraud and collusion – worth looking at – treble damages.
     

     
    713.901 (4) requires the certification of notices of liens (see IRS 7806 and 6065 and examine any lien notice for proper certification) by a “responsible” person (where’s the proof that the submitter is responsible to collect taxes and has a delegation of authority to perform that function?). Clerks never verify credentials of submitters or certification of the notice.
     
     
    Filing of Recorded Notices of Federal Tax Lien
     
     
    A lien notice is not a lien. The Clerk should file ONLY ACTUAL liens in the system of records reserved for liens. The Clerk should NOT file Notices in the Liens system. If the IRS does not like this, it can start creating paper liens, not invisible ones that it claims exist but really don’t. If it isn’t written, it isn’t true.
     
     
    Statewide Grand Jury
     
     
    IMO the clerk engages in racketeering with the IRS across multiple circuits throughout the state. Right now the Governor has empaneled (or will empanel) a Statewide Grand Jury. You should file an evidence package about this crime and demand SGJ investigation.
     

     
    —————————————————————————————–
     
    BobHurtSuit200707small <http://bobhurt.com/> Bob Hurt
    2460 Persian Drive #70
    Clearwater, FL 33763
    +1 (727) 669-5511
    Donate to my <http://bobhurt.com/lawdonation.htm> Law Scholarship fund
    Learn civil litigation with <http://www.jurisdictionary.com/index.asp?refercode=HB0002> Jurisdictionary
    Subscribe to <http://bobhurt.com/subscribetolawmen.htm> Lawmen Newsletter FREE
    Download <http://groups.google.com/group/lawmen/files> Files FREE from the Lawmen <http://groups.google.com/group/lawmen> Archive
    Improve your financial fortunes with <http://www.getzooks.biz/index.php?aff=bobhurt> GetZooks!
    <http://www.fuelsaver-mpg.com/affiliates/jrox.php?id=145_1_tlid_8_MailFoot> Save Fuel
     
    —————————————————————————————–
     

    “Bob Hurt” <bob@bobhurt.com> Dec 22 12:52PM -0500 ^
     
    Tom Cryer has filed a lawsuit (see below press release) against Rebecca O’Dell for defaming him in comments she made to subscribers of the St. Pete area Constitution Party meetup group. When I saw her comments, seemingly timed to coincide with Tommy’s upcoming Tea Party Squared tour of 7 Florida cities, I felt shocked because 1) they did not constitute truth, and 2) they seemed so atypical of an attorney because of their libelous nature.
      
    I forwarded them to Tommy. He wrote a correction to Rebecca and told her, effectively, that if she’d find laws making people liable, he’d let her off the hook. She published a partial-correction letter to her readers, but she otherwise spurned his mercy. So, he sued.
      
    The lawsuit does not please me, but then neither have I felt pleased about Rebecca’s intransigent attitude about the implementation of income tax in America, nor her attack on Tommy. And, Tommy should protect his reputation.
     

     
    She told me repeatedly that she did not like income tax, but that the courts say we all have to pay it, and we need to do that and take up the issue with Congress. I told her that the income tax as implemented violates Article I Section 2 Clause 3 and Section 9 Clause 4 of the US Constitution. She seemed to think that since the lower courts have ruled thousands of times in favor of the IRS , they must be right.
     

     
    Rebecca wrote me, in effect, that if she believed me, stopped paying tax as a consequence, and the IRS attacked her and prevailed against her, she’d sue me for damages for misleading her. She seemed pretty hostile about all the anti-income-tax gurus causing so many people to lose fortunes to the IRS and losing liberty to the courts.
     

     
    I guess that hostility spilled over onto Tom Cryer when I sent her his memorandum. She must have thought him one of the anti-income-tax gurus who tells people to stop filing and stop paying. But Tom has repeatedly explained, effectively, that such an action constitutes financial suicidal, and we can only prevail in that if many millions of Americans do it at the same time. Tom has said that we must work together on ALL FRONTS of activism, politically, socially, legally, and financially, to attack and defeat IRS abuses and the courts and politicians who support them.
     

     
    For several years I have advocated out and out legal attacks against IRS agents who abuse individuals – find the IRS agent errors, then demand correction, and failing correction, sue them and file administrative and criminal complaints against them. If EVERYBODY did this, IRS abuses would stop. Unfortunately, most people take Rebecca’s position and cave in to them without a fight.
     

     
    ——————————————————————————————————
     
    <http://bobhurt.com/> Bob Hurt • <http://bobhurt.com/subscribetolawmen.htm> Lawmen • <http://groups.google.com/group/lawmen/files> Files • <http://groups.google.com/group/lawmen> Archive • <http://bobhurt.com/lawdonation.htm> Scholarship • <http://www.jurisdictionary.com/index.asp?refercode=HB0002> Jurisdictionary • <http://www.getzooks.biz/index.php?aff=bobhurt> GetZooks!
     
    ——————————————————————————————————
     

     
    From: Tom Cryer
    Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 1:48 AM
    To: undisclosed-recipients:
    Subject: Update
     

     
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
     

     
    INTERNET DIATRIBE
     
    LANDS FLORIDA EMAILER IN COURT
     

     
    SHREVEPORT, LA—In a law suit filed by Louisiana attorney Tommy K. Cryer a Florida woman is being taken to task for distributing an email containing what Cryer’s suit alleges is a string of false and defamatory claims. According to the law suit filed in Shreveport, Louisiana, Rebecca O’Dell Townsend, a St. Petersburg, FL, attorney, published and distributed emails falsely accusing Cryer of being a disbarred tax evader who does not believe there is any such thing as a federal individual income tax.
     

     
    Cryer, who has been in uninterrupted law practice in Louisiana for over 36 years and who was cleared of tax evasion and willful failure to file charges by a unanimous “not guilty” jury verdict, says “I have no idea what prompted Townsend to fabricate and publish the false statements. Call me old fashioned, but I don’t understand why some people feel compelled to lie.”
     

     
    At the time Truth Attack (www.truthattack.org), a non-profit political action organization, which Cryer founded and heads up and whose stated mission is “putting the government back in its box—one tentacle at a time,” was in the process of promoting and conducting seminars for tea party and other political activists on what they called “The Lost Art of Citizenry”. The seminars offered instruction on how to organize and coordinate group activities, how to learn about our rights and government’s limitations, ways to distribute information to the public and inside information on how to influence representatives’ and government officials’ actions.
     

     
    Barely a week before the seven seminars were to begin Townsend published and distributed a blistering mass emailing that was distributed widely across the internet, stating that Cryer was a disbarred tax evader who contended that there is no such thing as a federal individual income tax and that Cryer and those associated with him “have left a wake of destroyed families in their wake.” Cryer said “I am not nor have I ever been disbarred, I am not a tax evader and have never destroyed a family in my life, let alone a ‘wake of families’, whatever that means.”
     

     
    Now Cryer has filed suit in Shreveport seeking damages for defamation. Cryer said “I don’t know this woman and have never heard of her before. I don’t know why she made up and published all these lies about me and my organization, but I will not sit idly by while someone attempts to destroy an unsullied reputation I have spent a lifetime in building.”
     

     
    Source: Truth Attack
     
    Contact: Jim Kerr, 318 795-2030
     
    hq@truthattack.org
     
    Interviews available on request
     

 


You received this because you have membership in the “Lawmen” Google Group.
Comment to group owner – reply to the message (only the owner posts messages).
See the archives, change options – visit http://groups.google.com/group/Lawmen
Join / Subscribe – send email to Lawmen+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Resign / Unsubscribe- send email to Lawmen+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

 

 

 

Older Posts »