Sharon4AndersonA09-2031 MN

January 24, 2010 by sharon4anderson

Case Number:	A092031 http://macsnc.courts.state.mn.us/ctrack/view/publicCaseMaintenance.do?csNameID=67124&expandParty=Y&display=false&view=N	Filing Date:	11/06/2009
Jurisdiction:	Court of Appeals	Status:	Closed
ORCA:	Civil Division Ramsey County District Court	Hearing Type:	Nonoral
Classification:	Standard – Civil – Other
Short Title:	In the Matter of Delinquent Real Property Taxes for Real Property Described, to wit: Lyman Dayton Addition to St. Paul, Lot 5, Blk 46, a/k/a 697 Surrey Avenue, PIN: 32.29.22.41.0053, Sharon Lee Anderson a/k/a Sharon Scarrella Anderson, record owner
Full Title:	In the Matter of Delinquent Real Property Taxes for Real Property Described, to wit: Lyman Dayton Addition to St. Paul, Lot 5, Blk 46, a/k/a 697 Surrey Avenue, PIN: 32.29.22.41.0053, Sharon Lee Anderson a/k/a Sharon Scarrella Anderson, record owner
Summary:
Citation:

- Hide Party Information

MACS ID	Appellate Role	Party Name	Attorney(s)
Party Information
51332	Appellant	Sharon Anderson	Pro Se
10976	Respondent	Ramsey County	JEAN STEPAN

Docketing Filter View
Display: ChronologicalThreaded

Docket Information
Document Description	Jurisdiction	Filing Date	Docket Entry Type	Filing Type	Status
Order – Dismiss – Not Stipulated, Entire Case	Court of Appeals	01/07/2010	Order	Dismiss – Not Stipulated, Entire Case	Final
Order – Remedy Deficiencies; requirement for APL to file cc of 9/10/09 judgment is waived. By 12/21 APL to file a NOA and SCA containing original signatures; aff/serv for NOA & SCA; copy of district court’s 9/18/09 IFP Order; 7 copies of APB with aff/serv (one must contain orig. signature)	Court of Appeals	12/07/2009	Order	Remedy Deficiencies	Final
Transcript – Delivery Certificate – Patricia Martinez	Court of Appeals	11/19/2009	Transcript	Delivery Certificate	Final
Notice – Case Filing	Court of Appeals	11/12/2009	Notice	Case Filing	Final
Statement – Case – Appellant	Court of Appeals	11/06/2009	Statement	Case – Appellant	Final
Notice – Appeal – Case Filed	Court of Appeals	11/06/2009	Notice	Appeal – Case Filed	Final
Transcript – Initial Certificate – Patricia Martinez	Court of Appeals	10/15/2009	Transcript	Initial Certificate	Final

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

MaryJaneDuchene v. WSt.Paul KoriLane RemFC

January 13, 2010 by sharon4anderson

Your on Search Engine’s Could not post to Blogger will try wordpress.com
From: DDAweb
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 04:40:34 -0600
To:
Subject: FC

United States District State of Minnesota

City of West St. Paul, Plaintiff, Notice of and Removal of Dakota County District Court Criminal Case on Grounds

VS. of Judicial Prejudice and Violations of
14th Amendment Due Process Rights.

Mary Jane Duchene, Defendant Federal Court File no.___________
Dakota County Citation no. 3-441797
Dakota County Court file: 19WS-CR-09-15734

TO: Dakota County District Court, Attorney for the City of West St. Paul

The undersigned removed this to US District Court BY VIRTUE OF 28 U.S.C. 1443;
28USC1443 – Google Search

“Any of the following … criminal prosecutions, commenced in a State court
may be removed by the defendant to the district court of the United States
for the district and division embracing the place wherein it is pending:

(1) Against any person who is denied or cannot enforce in the courts of
such State a right under any law providing for the equal civil rights of
citizens of the United States, or of all persons within the jurisdiction
thereof[.]

on the following grounds:

1) This Dakota County criminal action is observably a malicious prosecution by the plaintiffs in that action and the plaintiffs failed to comply with the legal process required by law and the Fourteenth and Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution, by stating facts 5th,14th Amendments US Constitution – Google Searchwhich comprise a criminal action, in continuing prosecution, which is shown in the selected court documents attached hereto.

That established US Supreme Court requirements as to required
specificity of a criminal accusation, see. e.g. United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1876), US v Cruikshank,92US – Google Search quoted and affirmed in Russell v. United States, 369 U.S. 749 at 763-765, Russell v. US 39 US 749 – Google Search which in turn is cited with approval in State v. Gross, 387 N.W. 2d 182 at 189 (Minn. App. 1986) . Gross,387 NW 2d 182 Minn App.1986 – Google Search

PDF]

State of Minnesota District Court County of Dakota First Judicial …

File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat – View as HTML
Oct 25, 2009 … Gross, 387 N.W. 2d 182 at 189. (Minn. App. 1986). That the right to a specific accusation including separate counts for distinct …
www.angelfire.com/mn3/advocate6/2009dog/motionvacatereverse.pdf

That the right to a specific accusation including separate counts for
distinct offenses charged has been incorporated by the fourteenth amendment to the United States Constitution. See: e.g. Cole v. Arkansas, 333 U.S. 196 at 201 (1942), Cole v. Arkansas,333 US 196 – Google Search and Faretta v. California, 442 U.S. 806 at 818(1975). Faretta v. California – Google Search

The plaintiffs have tried to allege that a police officer, allegedly hear a barking dog noise at my property, from a distance of over 200 feet, when scientific evidence clearly shows it would be impossible to identify such a sound, or even hear it, from such a distance, because sound diminished by about 75% at a distance of 200 feet or sixty meters, SEE SOUND CALCULATOR:

http://www.sengpielaudio.com/calculator-distance.htm.

The failure to withdraw the criminal complaint, AND INSTEAD RELENTLESSLY PURSUE MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, shows the plaintiffs are relying on a failure of due process and fairness in the Dakota County Courts and there is obvioulsy the potential for progressively more insane criminal accusations to transpire in future because of this case.
2) The plaintiff have done this as part of a pattern of misconduct which has occurred over a period of more than fifteen years.
3) The defendant cannot get a fair trial in Dakota County, as detailed in the select Dakota county court documents attached hereto, as there has been a hostile history with the Dakota County.
Federal law requires the automatic disqualification of a Federal judge under certain circumstances.
In 1994, the U.S. Supreme Court held that “Disqualification is required if an objective observer would entertain reasonable questions about the judge’s impartiality. If a judge’s attitude or state of mind leads a detached observer to conclude that a fair and impartial hearing is unlikely, the judge must be disqualified.” [Emphasis added]. Liteky v. U.S., 114 S.Ct. 1147, 1162 (1994).
Liteky v US 114 S.Ct.1147,1162 (1994) – Google Search

Judicial Disqualification

Feb 1, 2000 … Liteky v. U.S., 114 S.Ct. 1147, 1162 (1994). Courts have repeatedly held that positive proof of the partiality of a judge is not a …
www.clr.org/Judicial-disqualification.html – Cached – Similar

Courts have repeatedly held that positive proof of the partiality of a judge is not a requirement, only the appearance of partiality. Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp., 486 U.S. 847, 108 S.Ct. 2194 (1988) Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp 486 US847 – Google Search(what matters is not the reality of bias or prejudice but its appearance); United States v. Balistrieri, 779 F.2d 1191 (7th Cir. 1985) Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp 486 US847 – Google Search(Section 455(a) “is directed against the appearance of partiality, whether or not the judge is actually biased.”) (“Section 455(a) of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C. 455(a), is not intended to protect litigants from actual bias in their judge but rather to promote public confidence in the impartiality of the judicial process.”) .28USC 455 Judicial Code – Google Search
That Court also stated that Section 455(a) “requires a judge to recuse himself in any proceeding in which her impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” Taylor v. O’Grady, 888 F.2d 1189 (7th Cir. 1989). In Pfizer Inc. v. Lord, 456 F.2d 532 (8th Cir. 1972), the Court stated that “It is important that the litigant not only actually receive justice, but that he believes that he has received justice.”
The Supreme Court has ruled and has reaffirmed the principle that “justice must satisfy the
appearance of justice”, Levine v. United States, 362 U.S. 610, 80 S.Ct. 1038 (1960), citing Offutt v. United States, 348 U.S. 11, 14, 75 S.Ct. 11, 13 (1954). A judge receiving a bribe from an interested party over which he is presiding, does not give the appearance of justice.
“Recusal under Section 455 is self-executing; a party need not file affidavits in support of
recusal and the judge is obligated to recuse herself sua sponte under the stated circumstances.” Taylor v. O’Grady, 888 F.2d 1189 (7th Cir. 1989).
Further, the judge has a legal duty to disqualify himself even if there is no motion asking for his disqualification. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals further stated that “We think that this language [455(a)] imposes a duty on the judge to act sua sponte, even if no motion or affidavit is filed.” Balistrieri, at 1202.
Judges do not have discretion not to disqualify themselves. By law, they are bound to follow the law. Should a judge not disqualify himself as required by law, then the judge has given another example of his “appearance of partiality” which, possibly, further disqualifies the judge. Should another judge not accept the disqualification of the judge, then the second judge has evidenced an”appearance of partiality” and has possibly disqualified himself/ herself. None of the orders issued by any judge who has been disqualified by law would appear to be valid. It would appear that they are void as a matter of law, and are of no legal force or effect.
Should a judge not disqualify himself, then the judge is violation of the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution. United States v. Sciuto, 521 F.2d 842, 845 (7th Cir. 1996) US v. Sciuto 521 F.2d 842 – Google Search

(“The right to a tribunal free from bias or prejudice is based, not on section 144, but on the Due Process Clause.”).

State and Federal Due Process – Google Search
Should a judge issue any order after he has been disqualified by law, and if the party has been denied of any of his / her property, then the judge may have been engaged in the Federal Crime of “interference with interstate commerce”. The judge has acted in the judge’s personal capacity and not in the judge’s judicial capacity. It has been said that this judge, acting in this manner, has no more lawful authority than someone’s next-door neighbor (provided that he is not a judge).
However some judges may not follow the law.
If you were a non-represented litigant, and should the court not follow the law as to
non-represented litigants, then the judge has expressed an “appearance of partiality” and, under the law, it would seem that he/she has disqualified him/herself.
However, since not all judges keep up to date in the law, and since not all judges follow the law, it is possible that a judge may not know the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court and the other courts on this subject. Notice that it states “disqualification is required” and that a judge “must be disqualified” under certain circumstances.
The Supreme Court has also held that if a judge wars against the Constitution, or if he acts
without jurisdiction, he has engaged in treason to the Constitution. If a judge acts after he has been automatically disqualified by law, then he is acting without jurisdiction, and that suggest that he is then engaging in criminal acts of treason, and may be engaged in extortion and the interference with interstate commerce.
Courts have repeatedly ruled that judges have no immunity for their criminal acts. Since both treason and the interference with interstate commerce are criminal acts, no judge has immunity to engage in such acts.

4) The defendant¹s First Amendment rights are also being abused by this action as this action appears to be retaliation by the City of West St. Paul Attorney, for speaking out on disability issues, via a web site, relevant to Alice Krengel, as the citation was issued one week after the Minnesota Supreme Court ruled against that City Attorney, and in favor of Ms. Krengel.
RELIEF REQUESTED

1. AN INJUNCTION PROHIBITING THE CITY OF WEST ST. PAUL FROM CONTINUING THIS MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, AND CONTINUING TO SOLICIT AND ENGAGE IN DUE PROCESS VIOLATIONS IN THIS ACTION.
2. DAMAGES (INCLUSIVE BUT NOT LIMITED TO ACTUAL, PUNITIVE, AND EXEMPLARY) FOR ENGAGING IN A LONG TERM PATTERN OF HARASSMENT AGAINST THE DEFENDANT, FOR AN UNSPECIFIED AMOUNT.
January 11, 2010 Respectfully Submitted:
*
Mary Jane Duchene, BA, BS
1144 Ottawa Avenue
West St,. Paul, MN 55118
Fax: 651 457 4376
MariJaynDuchene@aol.com

http://www.angelfire.com/mn3advocate6/2009dog/wspnoise.html

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »

MN Judge Edward Toussaint A09-2031

January 11, 2010 by sharon4anderson

Date: Sunday, January 10, 2010, 2:05 PM

OPEN LETTER TO CHIEF JUDGE EDWARD TOUSSAINT

RE: CANONS CONSTRUCTION

MS 645.Canons of Construction Clarify “Abandoned” A09-2031

Sun.10Jan10

Judge Profile To: Chief Judge Eward Toussaint

age 69 Minnesota Judicial Center
Phone: (651) 297-7650 edward.toussaint@courts.state.mn.us

Sa Open Ltr Touss10 Jan10

ISSUES:

Pursuant to Ramsey 62cv09-1163 « Sharon4anderson’s Weblog Dist.Crt. File 62cv09-1163(Vandenorth)

Appeal A09-2031 www.sharon4anderson.wordpress.com

Affiant “takes” Issue with your “Orders” Please clarify “abandoned”

Sharon v. Judge Edward Toussaint A09-2031

Published now for Public Scrunity

COUNT I OATH OF OFFICE

Judicial Oath of Office Chapter 358

358 – SEALS, OATHS, ACKNOWLEDGMENTS, 2009 Minnesota Statutes

HAS CHIEF JUDGE EDWARD TOUSSAINT VIOLATED HIS OATH V. SHARON SCARRELLA ANDERSON?

Every judge of such municipal court, before he or she enters upon the duties of his or her office, shall take and subscribe the following oath or affirmation: “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of Washington, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of the office of judge of the municipal court of the city of . . . . . . (naming such city) according to the best of my ability; and I do further certify that I do not advocate, nor am I a member of an organization that advocates, the overthrow of the government of the United States by force or violence.” The oath shall be filed in the office of the county auditor. He or she shall also give such bonds to the state and city for the faithful performance of his or her duties as may be by law or ordinance directed.

COUNT II 42USC sec.1983-86

Civil Rights of Widow_WhiteWoman_Whistleblower 42usc

Civil Rights Act

Statutes Pertaining to Violations of Civil Rights. Title 42 U.S.C. § 1983. … Title 42 U.S.C § 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights …
www.defraudingamerica.com/civil_rights_act.html – Cached – Similar

in the “takings” of 91 Chrysler, denying “Transit”,Commerce by Theft, unabated by Black Police Chief John Harringon?

covert methodology of Diesel Therapy

a. “takings” Drivers License by Senile Judge Larry Cohen ,without Court Order and who’s 3rd Wife Kathleen Donnelly Cohen is VP of Comcast Cable Franchised by City St.Paul Mike Reardon with Relative Jack Reardon DSI Building Inspector giving rise to Appeal A09-2031 (Toussaint) Denial of Constutional Issue of

MS 429

COUNT 111 Constutional Challenge Rule 24.04

429 – LOCAL IMPROVEMENTS, SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS, 2009 Minnesota Statutes

429.061, 2009 Minnesota Statutes

city attorney Judy Hanson

b. Theft of Sharons 91 Chrysler to St.Police Impound Lot,

legaleaglesharon.blogspot.com re: Manager Aaron Foster .

c. Diesel Therapy on the general public to force Bus Ridership and that Damm Light Rail, now “taking” busines US CODE: Title 18,1595. Civil remedy along University Ave.

MN 2nd District Court

COUNT IV INTERFERANCE WITH HEATLH CARE DIESEL THERAPY

Diesel Therapy – Google Search and to join with 62cv09-011693 Unallotment File with Affidavit of Prejudice against Kathleen Gearin in her offical and personal capacitys re: SCAP “taking” Homestead Credits on Disabled, SilverSTar Marine etc.

Multiple Parties v. Governor of MN, et al

WINDS – George Hansen, Di esel Therapy and Susan McDougal

JR-Shar-Homeless_17

ShaRICO_1992_22

COUNT V DUE PROCESS FOR 30 YEARS

AFFIANT HAS BEEN DENIED FOR 30 YEARS IN HER COMMERCE,PROPERTY,TRANSPORTATION ANSASC_1988_15 D MARRIAGE,CHILDREN DM-1399_23 RIGHTS

SharonsRealestate_34 FedCases_13

memorandum of case law’s

Click here: City of Minneapolis, et al., Respondents, vs. Steven F. Meldahl, Appellant. C6-99-1490, Court of Appeals Published

www.lufsky.blogspot.com www.sharon4anderson.wordpress.com www.sharon4anderson.org

WINDS – George Hansen, Diesel Therapy and Susan McDougal

Punitative,Compensatory,Tort Damages in the millions for 30 years of heinous, repugnant Death,Disabilitys,Disparagment of Titles.

When the Court wilful fail to implement pdf files and/or Read the Entire Records………..Pervase/Fatal Any all Bogus Judgments are therefore VACATED.

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299

telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Sharon4 Anderson – Google Profile Candidate AG2010 www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com Blogger: User Profile: Sharon Anderson SharonsYahoo! iGoogle

Homestead Act of 1862 Twitter / Sharon4Anderson Shar1058’s Buzz Activity Page – My Buzz Activity – Yahoo! Buzz neopopulism.org – Pro Se Dec Action Litigation Pack Sharon4Anderson | Scribd Document’s are based on SEC filings, Blogger: Dashboard Home |
FAIR USE NOTICEThis site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of whistleblower protection issues, MY FindLaw SharonsWritProA06_1150_30Jun06_26
The CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Emailers
kare11.com_SA
Sharons-Psychic-Whispers: Sharons Gypsy Curse-Court-Cop Corruption 3Apr0 http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPlawsuit/courtfilings/Docket.htm Sharon4Council: DLJ Management v. City St. Paul A06-2118,Money LaunderinNo direct un-apportioned tax confirmed by the US Supreme Court rulings in CHAS. C. STEWARD MACH. CO. v. DAVIS, 301 U.S. 548, 581-582(1937) g andFCC Complaints – http://sharons-copywrite.blogspot.comknowledge gained as financial journalists , http://taxthemax.blogspot.com securities they recommend to readers, affiliated entities, employees, and agents an initial trade Public domain recommendation published on the Internet, after a direct mail publication is sent, before acting Google Search Times v. Sullvian Libel with malice – on that recommendations, and may contain errors. Investment decisions should not be based solely on these or other Public Office documents expressly forbids its writers from having financial interests in Google Search BlogItBabe2007 Candidate profile Sharon4Anderson’s Legal BlogBriefs Sharon4And

WOW !!! You Go Girl !!!

Blessings,

Bill
— On Sun, 1/10/10, Sharon4Anderson@aol.com <Sharon4Anderson@aol.com> wrote:

From: Sharon4Anderson@aol.com <Sharon4Anderson@aol.com>
Subject: OPEN LETTR(Toussaint) A09-2031 DIESELTHERAPY TAKING DL AND CAR
To: edward.toussaint@courts.state.mn.us, eric.magnuson@courts.state.mn.us, fred.grittner@courts.state.mn.us, john.vandenorth@courts.state.mn.us, tim.pawlenty@state.mn.us, askdoj@usdoj.gov, askcorrections@co.ramsey.mn.us, askhomesteads@co.ramsey.mn.us, AskHumanServices@co.ramsey.mn.us, baverill@mndaily.com, eeskola@cbs.com, ddavis@forumcomm.com, hopfen@startribune.com, rstassen-berger@pioneerpress.com, ochsnews@yahoo.com, bbowring@tpt.org, charley.shaw@legal-ledger.com, mlohn@ap.org, jragsdale@pioneerpress.com, ahart@kare11.com, mfischenich@mankatofreepress.com, EEskola@aol.com, tim.budig@ecm-inc.com, ndraper@startribune.com, lmccallum@mpr.org, bsalisbury@pioneerpress.com, lschumacher@stcloudtimes.com, pcondon@ap.org, mbrunswick@startribune.com, ntibbetts@mndaily.com, pjkessler@wcco.cbs.com, jcroman@kare11.com, plopez@startribune.com, tscheck@mpr.org, thauser@kstp.com, mlahammer@tpt.org, pdoyle@startribune.com, rrosario@pioneerpress.com, klksnews@yahoo.com, lsturdevant@startribune.com, jayjohnson@postbulletin.com, bbakst@ap.org, dbrewster@startribune.com, glenn.wilson@state.mn.us, commerce.commissioner@state.mn.us, financial.commerce@state.mn.us, weights.measures@state.mn.us, energy.info@state.mn.us, securities.commerce@state.mn.us, licensing.commerce@state.mn.us, mn.relay@state.mn.us, telecom.commerce@state.mn.us, unclaimed.property@state.mn.us, commerce.webmaster@state.mn.us, insurance.commerce@state.mn.us, market.assurance@state.mn.us, general.commerce@state.mn.us, petrofund.commerce@state.mn.us, marcia.moermond@ci.stpaul.mn.us, kenneth.smith@ci.stpaul.mn.us, margaret.egan@ci.stpaul.mn.us, elizabeth.davis@ci.stpaul.mn.us, trudy.moloney@ci.stpaul.mn.us, thomas.davenport@ci.stpaul.mn.us, mkib73@hotmail.com, tim@e-democracy.org, eva@evaformayor.com, Sharon4Mayor@aol.com, BillDahn4Mayor@aol.com, chris.coleman@ci.stpaul.mn.us, bob@calhouncompanies.com, will@willrossbach.com, aonealpha@yahoo.com, mayorlongrie@yahoo.com, jtstiles@gmail.com, FreedomLawSchool@yahoogroups.com, COURTWATCHERS_OF_AMERICA@yahoogroups.com.luis
Cc: bruc0015@umn.edu, silha@tc.umn.edu, a_democracy@yahoo.com, nancylazaryan@gmail.com, leslie@lesliedavis.org, shari.moore@ci.stpaul.mn.us, Sharia4Law@aol.com, curt.brown@startribune.com, webmaster@am1500.com, infor@judicialwatch.org, JURIST@law.pitt.edu, b.todd.jones@usdoj.gov, newsroom@mpr.org, newstips@wcco.com
Date: Sunday, January 10, 2010, 2:05 PM

OPEN LETTER TO CHIEF JUDGE EDWARD TOUSSAINT

RE: CANONS CONSTRUCTION

MS 645.Canons of Construction Clarify “Abandoned” A09-2031

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Sharons A09-2031_Rehear Enbanc(Toussaint)

January 8, 2010 by sharon4anderson

Court of Appeals

Download/view high-resolution version of this photo

LEGAL NOTICE TO PETITION ENBANC, ALL APPELATE JUDGES,Conspiracy Planet – Whistleblower: Rodney Stich – Whistleblower Sues Crooked Judges RE: THEN QUO WARRANTO TO CHIEF JUSTICE ERICFOR DAMAGES UNDERhttp://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=54&contentid=103&page=2

CIVIL RIGHTS
) ACT (42 U.S.C. Sections 1983-1986); http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=Civil+Rights+42USC+1983-1986

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=RICO+USC+1961-1965

RICO (18 U.S.C. Sections 1961-1965); ) BIVENS DOCTRINE; FRAUD; http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=Bivens+Doctrine+Fraud+Declaratory+Judgment

    ) DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
) (28 U.S.C. Sections 2201, 2202);           Declaratory Judgment 28USC 2201,2202 – Google Search
) CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS;                    Constitutional Violations – Google Search
) REPORTING FEDERAL CRIMES
) (18 U.S.C. Section 4);                                             Reporting Fed. Crimes 18USC section 4 – Google Search
) 28 U.S.C. Section 1361 REQUIRING
) FEDERAL OFFICER TO PERFORM A DUTY       28 USC sec 1361 – Google Search    http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=28+USC+sec+1361
)                                                                                         State Jury Trial and Removal to Federal Court – Google Search
) DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL ON ALL
) JURY ISSUES , AND OR REMOVAL TO FEDERAL COURT. Jury Trial and Removal to Federal Court – Google Search

Case Number:

A092031Toussa intORA092031-1207.pdf

Filing Date:

11/06/2009

Jurisdiction:

Court of Appeals

Status:

Closed

ORCA:

Civil Division Ramsey County District Court

Hearing Type:

Nonoral

Classification:

Standard – Civil – Other

Short Title:

In the Matter of Delinquent Real Property Taxes for Real Property Described, to wit: Lyman Dayton Addition to St. Paul, Lot 5, Blk 46, a/k/a 697 Surrey Avenue, PIN: 32.29.22.41.0053, Sharon Lee Anderson a/k/a Sharon Scarrella Anderson, record owner

Full Title:

Summary:

Citation:

+ Display Party Information

Docketing Filter View
Display: ChronologicalThreaded

Docket Information

Document Description

Jurisdiction

Filing Date

Docket Entry Type

Filing Type

Status

Order – Dismiss – Not Stipulated, Entire Case

Court of Appeals

01/07/2010

Order

Dismiss – Not Stipulated, Entire Case

Final

Order – Remedy Deficiencies; requirement for APL to file cc of 9/10/09 judgment is waived. By 12/21 APL to file a NOA and SCA containing original signatures; aff/serv for NOA & SCA; copy of district court’s 9/18/09 IFP Order; 7 copies of APB with aff/serv (one must contain orig. signature)

Court of Appeals

12/07/2009

Order

Remedy Deficiencies

Final

Transcript – Delivery Certificate – Patricia Martinez

Court of Appeals

11/19/2009

Transcript

Delivery Certificate

Final

Notice – Case Filing

Court of Appeals

11/12/2009

Notice

Case Filing

Final

Statement – Case – Appellant

Court of Appeals

11/06/2009

Statement

Case – Appellant

Final

Notice – Appeal – Case Filed

Court of Appeals

11/06/2009

Notice

Appeal – Case Filed

Final

Transcript – Initial Certificate – Patricia Martinez

Civil, Family & Probate Case Records Search Results

Logout Search Menu New Civil Search

Search Criteria: 62cv09-1163

Location : All MNCIS Sites – Case Search

Help

Case Number	Style	Filed/Location/Judicial Officer	Type/Status
62-CV-09-1163	Delinquent Real Property Taxes for 2008	02/12/2009 Ramsey Civil VanDeNorth, John B., Jr.	Administrative File Closed

Court of Appeals

Logout Search Menu New Civil Search Back

Location : All MNCIS Sites – Case Search

Help

Case No. 62-CV-09-1163

Delinquent Real Property Taxes for 2008

§
§
§
§
§
§

Case Type:	Administrative File
Date Filed:	02/12/2009
Location:	Ramsey Civil
Judicial Officer:	VanDeNorth, John B., Jr.

Party Information

				Lead Attorneys
Topic	Delinquent Real Property Taxes for 2008			STEPAN, JEAN Retained

Events & Orders of the Court

DISPOSITIONS

02/12/2009

Closed administratively

09/10/2009

Judgment (Judicial Officer: VanDeNorth, John B., Jr.)

OTHER EVENTS AND HEARINGS

02/12/2009

Notice-Other

03/31/2009

Affidavit for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis

03/31/2009

Order-Other (Judicial Officer: Lindman, Dale B. )

03/31/2009

Affidavit-Other

04/02/2009

Other Document

04/06/2009

Affidavit of Service

04/06/2009

Correspondence

04/06/2009

Other Document

04/06/2009

Other Document

04/06/2009

Other Document

04/07/2009

Order to Remove (Judicial Officer: Johnson, Gregg E. )

04/09/2009

Notice of Case Reassignment

04/10/2009

Correspondence

06/26/2009

Affidavit of Publication

06/26/2009

Other Document

07/06/2009

Publicly Viewable Note to File

07/15/2009

Motion

07/15/2009

Memorandum

07/15/2009

Affidavit-Other

07/15/2009

Affidavit-Other

07/15/2009

Affidavit of Service

08/10/2009

Affidavit of Prejudice

08/12/2009

Notice of Motion and Motion

08/13/2009

Other Document

08/17/2009

Motion

08/19/2009

Other Document

08/20/2009

Motion Summary Judgment (10:30 AM) (Judicial Officer VanDeNorth, John B., Jr.)

Result: Held

09/09/2009

Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order (Judicial Officer: VanDeNorth, John B., Jr. )

09/10/2009

Judgment

09/10/2009

Notice of Entry of Judgment

09/11/2009

Other Document

09/11/2009

Other Document

09/14/2009

Notice of Appeal

09/14/2009

Other Document

09/14/2009

Supplemental Affidavit for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis

09/15/2009

Supplemental Affidavit for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis

09/18/2009

Supplemental Order for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis (Judicial Officer: VanDeNorth, John B., Jr. )

09/18/2009

Correspondence

09/21/2009

Affidavit of Service

10/20/2009

Other Document

10/27/2009

Notice of Appeal

10/30/2009

Affidavit of Service

11/02/2009

Statement of Case

11/05/2009

Affidavit-Other

11/17/2009

Notice of Case Filing

11/18/2009

Certificate of Receipt of Transcript-Appellate Court

11/18/2009

Transcript

12/02/2009

Statement of Case

12/23/2009

Other Document

12/28/2009

Briefs

01/08/2010

Order-Other (Judicial Officer: Toussaint, Edward, Jr. )

10/15/2009

Transcript

Initial Certificate

Final

ToussaintORA092031-1207.pdf

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Eminent Domain(MN) 19CX-07-030126(Mayer) A08-767

January 8, 2010 by sharon4anderson


Case Number:	A080767	Filing Date:	05/02/2008
Jurisdiction:	Both	Status:	Post-Decision (COA)
Short Title:	Eagan Economic Development Authority, Respondent, vs. U-Haul Company of Minnesota a/k/a U-Haul Co. of Minnesota, et al., Appellants, Randall J. Quam, et al., Appellants, Larson Training Services, Inc. d/b/a Larson’s Automotive Repair Services, Appellants, vs. Minnesota’s Credit Union, et al., Respondents Below, Irma L. Parranto, et al., Respondents, Jamal D. Ansari, et al., Respondents Below	Hearing Type:	Oral

Originating Court/Agency Information

Appeal From: District Court

Other:

Court/Agency: Hastings Civil Division Dakota County District Court

Orig Case Number: 19-CX-07-030126

Orig Case Title: EAGAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, A MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL vs. MINNESOTAS CREDIT UNION, A MINNESOTA CORPORATION

Related Case Number(s):

Decisionmaker(s)
Michael J. Maye

Case Number:	A080767	Filing Date:	05/02/2008
Jurisdiction:	Both	Status:	Post-Decision
ORCA:	Hastings Civil Division Dakota County District Court	Hearing Type:	Oral
Classification:	Standard – Civil – Other
Short Title:	Eagan Economic Development Authority, Respondent, vs. U-Haul Company of Minnesota a/k/a U-Haul Co. of Minnesota, et al., Appellants, Randall J. Quam, et al., Appellants, Larson Training Services, Inc. d/b/a Larson’s Automotive Repair Services, Appellants, vs. Minnesota’s Credit Union, et al., Respondents Below, Irma L. Parranto, et al., Respondents, Jamal D. Ansari, et al., Respondents Below
Full Title:	Eagan Economic Development Authority, Respondent, vs. U-Haul Company of Minnesota a/k/a U-Haul Co. of Minnesota, et al., Appellants, Randall J. Quam, et al., Appellants, Larson Training Services, Inc. d/b/a Larson’s Automotive Repair Services, Appellants, vs. Minnesota’s Credit Union, et al., Respondents Below, Irma L. Parranto, et al., Respondents, Jamal D. Ansari, et al., Respondents Below
Summary:
Citation:	765 N.W.2d 403 (Minn. App. 2009)http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=765+NW2d+403%28Minn.App.2009%29&btnG=Google+Search

PFR Information
Filing Date:	06/23/2009	Status:	Decision
Short Title:	Eagan Economic Development Authority, Appellant, vs. U-Haul Company of Minnesota a/k/a U-Haul Co. of Minnesota, et al., Respondents, Randall J. Quam, et al., Respondents, Larson Training Services, Inc. d/b/a Larson’s Automotive Repair Services, Respondents, vs. Minnesota’s Credit Union, et al., Respondents Below, Irma L. Parranto, et al., Respondents, Jamal D. Ansari, et al., Respondents Below	Hearing Type:	Oral

+ Display Party Information

Docketing Filter View
Display: ChronologicalThreaded

Docket Information
Document Description	Jurisdiction	Filing Date	Docket Entry Type	Filing Type	Status
Event – Oral – En Banc	Supreme Court	01/06/2010	Event	Oral – En Banc	Final
Event – Oral En Banc – scheduled	Supreme Court	11/30/2009	Event	Oral En Banc – scheduled	Final
Brief – Reply	Supreme Court	11/12/2009	Brief	Reply	Final
Brief – Amicus; Institute for Justice Minnesota Chapter	Supreme Court	11/06/2009	Brief	Amicus	Final
Brief – Respondent	Supreme Court	10/28/2009	Brief	Respondent	Final
Received amended appendix to appellant’s brief	Supreme Court	10/19/2009	Correspondence	Incoming	Final
Brief – Amicus; League of Minnesota Cities	Supreme Court	10/02/2009	Brief	Amicus	Final
Brief – Appellant	Supreme Court	09/25/2009	Brief	Appellant	Final
Order – Grant Amicus for Institute for Justice Minnesota Chapter	Supreme Court	09/17/2009	Order	Grant Amicus	Final
Motion – Amicus – Institute for Justice Minnesota Chapter	Supreme Court	09/10/2009	Motion	Amicus – Leave to File Motion	Final
Order – Grant Amicus of League of Minnesota Cities	Supreme Court	08/26/2009	Order	Grant Amicus	Final
Order – PFR – Grant	Supreme Court	08/26/2009	Order	PFR – Grant	Final
Response – Petition for Review of Amerco Real Estate Co. & U-Haul Co.	Supreme Court	07/24/2009	Response	Petition for Review	Final
Motion – Amicus – League of Minnesota Cities	Supreme Court	07/06/2009	Motion	Amicus – Leave to File Motion	Final
Petition – Further Review	Supreme Court	06/30/2009	Petition	Further Review	Final
Letter sent to the attorney for Eagan Economic Development Authority regarding the nonconforming petiton for review received on June 17, 2009.	Supreme Court	06/23/2009	Correspondence	Outgoing	Final
Other – Docket Notation – Received nonconforming petiton for review from Eagan Economic Development Authority	Supreme Court	06/17/2009	Other	Docket Notation	Final
Objection – Costs and Disbursements	Court of Appeals	06/08/2009	Objection	Costs and Disbursements	Final
Letter to Clerk of the Appellate Courts regarding clarification of Notice of Taxation of Costs.	Court of Appeals	06/08/2009	Affidavit	Service	Final
Notice – Taxation of Costs	Court of Appeals	06/03/2009	Notice	Taxation of Costs	Final
Opinion – Published	Court of Appeals	05/19/2009	Opinion	Published	Final
Notice – Opinion Release Imminent	Court of Appeals	05/14/2009	Notice	Opinion Release Imminent	Final
Event – Oral – Panel	Court of Appeals	02/19/2009	Event	Oral – Panel	Final
Notice – Oral Argument Date Scheduled	Court of Appeals	12/24/2008	Notice	Oral Argument Date Scheduled	Final
Event – Oral Panel – scheduled for 2/19/09, #200, 9:30	Court of Appeals	12/24/2008	Event	Oral Panel – scheduled	Final
Event – Orig. Court/Agency Files/Exhibits Received-BOX-	Court of Appeals	10/10/2008	Event	Orig. Court/Agency Files/Exhibits Received	Final
Notice – Request Trial Court/Agency File	Court of Appeals	09/26/2008	Notice	Request Trial Court/Agency File	Final
Brief – Reply	Court of Appeals	09/23/2008	Brief	Reply	Final
Brief – Respondent; Eagan Economic Development Authority	Court of Appeals	09/10/2008	Brief	Respondent	Final
Notice – Attorney Withdrawal – U-Haul & Americo Real Estate Co.	Court of Appeals	08/15/2008	Notice	Attorney Withdrawal or Substitution	Final
Brief – Appellant	Court of Appeals	08/12/2008	Brief	Appellant	Final
Order – Deny; the amount of supersedeas bond remanded to district court	Court of Appeals	07/22/2008	Order	Deny	Final
Transcript – Delivery Certificate – Lois Schwelling	Court of Appeals	07/09/2008	Transcript	Delivery Certificate	Final
Joint Reply – Response – Motion	Court of Appeals	07/03/2008	Reply	Other	Final
Response – Motion (Respondent EDA)	Court of Appeals	06/26/2008	Response	Motion	Final
Appellants’ Motion – for Review of Stay Orders	Court of Appeals	06/20/2008	Motion	Other	Final
Letter – Respondent, American Accounts & Advisers, Inc., will not be filing a respondent’s brief.	Court of Appeals	05/21/2008	Correspondence	Incoming	Final
Correspondence – Incoming	Court of Appeals	05/20/2008	Correspondence	Incoming	Final
Transcript – Initial Certificate – Lois Schwelling	Court of Appeals	05/19/2008	Transcript	Initial Certificate	Final
Statement – Case – Respondent Eagan Economic Development Authority	Court of Appeals	05/12/2008	Statement	Case – Respondent	Final
Notice – Case Filing	Court of Appeals	05/06/2008	Notice	Case Filing	Final
Statement – Case – Appellants	Court of Appeals	05/02/2008	Statement	Case – Appellant	Final
Notice – Appeal – Case Filed; Order 4/16/08	Court of Appeals	05/02/2008	Notice	Appeal – Case Filed	Final

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Eminent Domain A08-767 Eagan Dev.v.U Haul

January 8, 2010 by sharon4anderson

Federal Court Forms http://www.mnd.uscourts.gov/FORMS/court_forms.shtml Educational Iteresting “Due Process” http://www.state.il.us/court/OPINIONS/SupremeCourt/2009/December/107429.pdf http://www.lpa.state.mn.us/pdf/infopackets/EminentDomaininMinnesota.pdf

Click here: Eminent Domain Cases MN – Google Search Scrool down to the latest Eminen Domain Case re: EagenNews results for Eminent Domain Cases MN

Minnesota Supreme Court hears Eagan eminent domain case‎ – 16 hours ago

At issue is whether the city’s economic development authority had the power to seize the three properties by eminent domain, a controversial development …

Pioneer Press – 8 related articles » http://www.inversecondemnation.com/files/opa080767-0519.pdf

Eagan News – Topix

A080767

Supreme Court

Eagan Economic Development Authority, Appellant, vs. U-Haul Company of Minnesota a/k/a U-Haul Co. of Minnesota, et al., Respondents, Randall J. Quam, et al., Respondents, Larson Training Services, Inc. d/b/a Larson’s Automotive Repair Services, Respondents, vs. Minnesota’s Credit Union, et al., Respondents Below, Irma L. Parranto, et al., Respondents, Jamal D. Ansari, et al., Respondents Below

Decision

Civil

Other

06/23/2009

A080767

Court of Appeals

Eagan Economic Development Authority, Respondent, vs. U-Haul Company of Minnesota a/k/a U-Haul Co. of Minnesota, et al., Appellants, Randall J. Quam, et al., Appellants, Larson Training Services, Inc. d/b/a Larson’s Automotive Repair Services, Appellants, vs. Minnesota’s Credit Union, et al., Respondents Below, Irma L. Parranto, et al., Respondents, Jamal D. Ansari, et al., Respondents Below

Click here: C-Track – Public Site It would be E-Commerce to pdf all Documents for Public Scrunity When you type in the File just type 767 www.sharon4anderson.wordpress.com trying to have all Files in pdf format

Help

http://macsnc.courts.state.mn.us/ctrack/search/publicCaseSearch.do#

Case Search

Participant Search

Case Search
Case Number:		Case Title:		Case Group:	Abbreviated Adversarial Administrative Files Other Professional Regulation Standard
Jurisdiction:	Court of Appeals Supreme Court	Status:	Archived Briefing Closed Court Hearing Decision Open Panel Hearing Petition PFR Post-Decision Pre-Appeal Pre-Briefing Pre-Hearing Referee Stayed	Case Type:	Ad Hoc Committee-Task Force Attorney Civil Criminal Election Contest Interdistrict Assignment Judge Judicial Appeal Panel Other Petition for Discretionary Review (Rule 105) Rules Proceeding Standing Committee-Task Force Writs
Date From:		To:		Case SubType:	1st Deg. Murder-Deft. Postconviction 1st Deg. Murder-Direct 1st Deg. Murder-Prosec. Acquittal/Vac… 1st Deg. Murder-Prosec. Postconviction Admin Rule Decl Jdgment Adoption Archived Board of Law Examiners Appeal Certified Question (foreign court) Certified Question (MN court) Certiorari Conditions of Release Conviction Discipline Economic Security Family Habeas Corpus Implied Consent Juvenile Delinq.-Appeal by Child or P… Juvenile Delinq.-Certified Question Juvenile Delinq.-EJJ/Certification Juvenile Delinq.-Non-EJJ/Certification Juvenile Delinq.-Probation Revocation Juvenile Delinq.-Prosec. App.-Denial … Juvenile Delinq.-Prosec. App.-Pretrial Juvenile Delinq.-Prosec. App.-Sentenc… Juvenile Protection-Other Juvenile Protection-Termination of Pa… Mental Commitment/Psychopathic Person… Other Other-Direct Paternity Postconviction Pre-Trial Probate/Guardianship/Conservatorship Prohibition/Mandamus Prohibition/Mandamus-Direct Prosec. Acquittal-Vacation Prosec. Postconviction Reinstatement Review Panel Decision Sentencing-Probation Revocation Tax Court Trusteeship Unlawful Detainer/Eviction Workers’ Comp
Exclude Closed/Archived:
			Searching…

1 to 2 of 2 records are displayed.

Case Number	Jurisdiction	Short Title	Status	Type	SubType	Filing Date
Search Results
A080767	Supreme Court	Eagan Economic Development Authority, Appellant, vs. U-Haul Company of Minnesota a/k/a U-Haul Co. of Minnesota, et al., Respondents, Randall J. Quam, et al., Respondents, Larson Training Services, Inc. d/b/a Larson’s Automotive Repair Services, Respondents, vs. Minnesota’s Credit Union, et al., Respondents Below, Irma L. Parranto, et al., Respondents, Jamal D. Ansari, et al., Respondents Below	Decision	Civil	Other	06/23/2009
A080767	Court of Appeals	Eagan Economic Development Authority, Respondent, vs. U-Haul Company of Minnesota a/k/a U-Haul Co. of Minnesota, et al., Appellants, Randall J. Quam, et al., Appellants, Larson Training Services, Inc. d/b/a Larson’s Automotive Repair Services, Appellants, vs. Minnesota’s Credit Union, et al., Respondents Below, Irma L. Parranto, et al., Respondents, Jamal D. Ansari, et al., Respondents Below	Post-Decision	Civil	Other	05/02/2008

1 to 2 of 2 records are displayed.

Help

http://macsnc.courts.state.mn.us/ctrack/view/publicCaseMaintenance.do?csNameID=63483#

Case View

ORCA Info

Case Information
Case Number:	A080767	Filing Date:	05/02/2008
Jurisdiction:	Both	Status:	Post-Decision
ORCA:	Hastings Civil Division Dakota County District Court	Hearing Type:	Oral
Classification:	Standard – Civil – Other
Short Title:	Eagan Economic Development Authority, Respondent, vs. U-Haul Company of Minnesota a/k/a U-Haul Co. of Minnesota, et al., Appellants, Randall J. Quam, et al., Appellants, Larson Training Services, Inc. d/b/a Larson’s Automotive Repair Services, Appellants, vs. Minnesota’s Credit Union, et al., Respondents Below, Irma L. Parranto, et al., Respondents, Jamal D. Ansari, et al., Respondents Below
Full Title:	Eagan Economic Development Authority, Respondent, vs. U-Haul Company of Minnesota a/k/a U-Haul Co. of Minnesota, et al., Appellants, Randall J. Quam, et al., Appellants, Larson Training Services, Inc. d/b/a Larson’s Automotive Repair Services, Appellants, vs. Minnesota’s Credit Union, et al., Respondents Below, Irma L. Parranto, et al., Respondents, Jamal D. Ansari, et al., Respondents Below
Summary:
Citation:	765 N.W.2d 403 (Minn. App. 2009)

PFR Information
Filing Date:	06/23/2009	Status:	Decision
Short Title:	Eagan Economic Development Authority, Appellant, vs. U-Haul Company of Minnesota a/k/a U-Haul Co. of Minnesota, et al., Respondents, Randall J. Quam, et al., Respondents, Larson Training Services, Inc. d/b/a Larson’s Automotive Repair Services, Respondents, vs. Minnesota’s Credit Union, et al., Respondents Below, Irma L. Parranto, et al., Respondents, Jamal D. Ansari, et al., Respondents Below	Hearing Type:	Oral

+ Display Party Information

Docketing Filter View
Display: ChronologicalThreaded

Docket Information
Document Description	Jurisdiction	Filing Date	Docket Entry Type	Filing Type	Status
Event – Oral – En Banc	Supreme Court	01/06/2010	Event	Oral – En Banc	Final
Event – Oral En Banc – scheduled	Supreme Court	11/30/2009	Event	Oral En Banc – scheduled	Final
Brief – Reply	Supreme Court	11/12/2009	Brief	Reply	Final
Brief – Amicus; Institute for Justice Minnesota Chapter	Supreme Court	11/06/2009	Brief	Amicus	Final
Brief – Respondent	Supreme Court	10/28/2009	Brief	Respondent	Final
Received amended appendix to appellant’s brief	Supreme Court	10/19/2009	Correspondence	Incoming	Final
Brief – Amicus; League of Minnesota Cities	Supreme Court	10/02/2009	Brief	Amicus	Final
Brief – Appellant	Supreme Court	09/25/2009	Brief	Appellant	Final
Order – Grant Amicus for Institute for Justice Minnesota Chapter	Supreme Court	09/17/2009	Order	Grant Amicus	Final
Motion – Amicus – Institute for Justice Minnesota Chapter	Supreme Court	09/10/2009	Motion	Amicus – Leave to File Motion	Final
Order – Grant Amicus of League of Minnesota Cities	Supreme Court	08/26/2009	Order	Grant Amicus	Final
Order – PFR – Grant	Supreme Court	08/26/2009	Order	PFR – Grant	Final
Response – Petition for Review of Amerco Real Estate Co. & U-Haul Co.	Supreme Court	07/24/2009	Response	Petition for Review	Final
Motion – Amicus – League of Minnesota Cities	Supreme Court	07/06/2009	Motion	Amicus – Leave to File Motion	Final
Petition – Further Review	Supreme Court	06/30/2009	Petition	Further Review	Final
Letter sent to the attorney for Eagan Economic Development Authority regarding the nonconforming petiton for review received on June 17, 2009.	Supreme Court	06/23/2009	Correspondence	Outgoing	Final
Other – Docket Notation – Received nonconforming petiton for review from Eagan Economic Development Authority	Supreme Court	06/17/2009	Other	Docket Notation	Final
Objection – Costs and Disbursements	Court of Appeals	06/08/2009	Objection	Costs and Disbursements	Final
Letter to Clerk of the Appellate Courts regarding clarification of Notice of Taxation of Costs.	Court of Appeals	06/08/2009	Affidavit	Service	Final
Notice – Taxation of Costs	Court of Appeals	06/03/2009	Notice	Taxation of Costs	Final
Opinion – Published	Court of Appeals	05/19/2009	Opinion	Published	Final
Notice – Opinion Release Imminent	Court of Appeals	05/14/2009	Notice	Opinion Release Imminent	Final
Event – Oral – Panel	Court of Appeals	02/19/2009	Event	Oral – Panel	Final
Notice – Oral Argument Date Scheduled	Court of Appeals	12/24/2008	Notice	Oral Argument Date Scheduled	Final
Event – Oral Panel – scheduled for 2/19/09, #200, 9:30	Court of Appeals	12/24/2008	Event	Oral Panel – scheduled	Final
Event – Orig. Court/Agency Files/Exhibits Received-BOX-	Court of Appeals	10/10/2008	Event	Orig. Court/Agency Files/Exhibits Received	Final
Notice – Request Trial Court/Agency File	Court of Appeals	09/26/2008	Notice	Request Trial Court/Agency File	Final
Brief – Reply	Court of Appeals	09/23/2008	Brief	Reply	Final
Brief – Respondent; Eagan Economic Development Authority	Court of Appeals	09/10/2008	Brief	Respondent	Final
Notice – Attorney Withdrawal – U-Haul & Americo Real Estate Co.	Court of Appeals	08/15/2008	Notice	Attorney Withdrawal or Substitution	Final
Brief – Appellant	Court of Appeals	08/12/2008	Brief	Appellant	Final
Order – Deny; the amount of supersedeas bond remanded to district court	Court of Appeals	07/22/2008	Order	Deny	Final
Transcript – Delivery Certificate – Lois Schwelling	Court of Appeals	07/09/2008	Transcript	Delivery Certificate	Final
Joint Reply – Response – Motion	Court of Appeals	07/03/2008	Reply	Other	Final
Response – Motion (Respondent EDA)	Court of Appeals	06/26/2008	Response	Motion	Final
Appellants’ Motion – for Review of Stay Orders	Court of Appeals	06/20/2008	Motion	Other	Final
Letter – Respondent, American Accounts & Advisers, Inc., will not be filing a respondent’s brief.	Court of Appeals	05/21/2008	Correspondence	Incoming	Final
Correspondence – Incoming	Court of Appeals	05/20/2008	Correspondence	Incoming	Final
Transcript – Initial Certificate – Lois Schwelling	Court of Appeals	05/19/2008	Transcript	Initial Certificate	Final
Statement – Case – Respondent Eagan Economic Development Authority	Court of Appeals	05/12/2008	Statement	Case – Respondent	Final
Notice – Case Filing	Court of Appeals	05/06/2008	Notice	Case Filing	Final
Statement – Case – Appellants	Court of Appeals	05/02/2008	Statement	Case – Appellant	Final
Notice – Appeal – Case Filed; Order 4/16/08	Court of Appeals	05/02/2008	Notice	Appeal – Case Filed	Final

Post-Decision

Civil

Other

05/02/2008

1 to 3 of 3 records are displayed.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Tim Kinley 62F196163(Cleary)

January 7, 2010 by sharon4anderson

Civil, Family & Probate Case Records Search Results lEGAL NOTICE TO THE PUBLICPlease be so informed of Tim Kinley’s Court Hearing 25Jan2010 _ 62f196163(Cleary) Please send Appellate and Federal File Case NO’s for Research, Anyone having trouble with any Judges Listed: Help make the Courts Accountable, PDF Files must be scanned in URL for Public Scrunity, Fair,Impartial Justice.

Logout Search Menu New Civil Search

Search Criteria: 62f196163

Location : All MNCIS Sites – Case Search

Help

Case Number	Style	Filed/Location/Judicial Officer	Type/Status
62-F1-96-000163	BARBARA A. KINLEY vs.TIMOTHY C. KINLEY & Ramsey County, Intervenor [CHW REMOVED] [GWB RECUSED]{EFB REMOVED] Box File [J&D 120997 FLINN J(CAF) 1031 218-239]	01/23/1996 Ramsey Family Main Cleary, Edward J.	Dissolution with Child Dormant

Logout Search Menu New Civil Search Back

Location : All MNCIS Sites – Case Search

Help

Case No. 62-F1-96-000163

BARBARA A. KINLEY vs.TIMOTHY C. KINLEY & Ramsey County, Intervenor [CHW REMOVED] [GWB RECUSED]{EFB REMOVED]** Box File ** [J&D 120997 FLINN J(CAF) 1031 218-239]

§
§
§
§
§
§

Case Type:	Dissolution with Child
Date Filed:	01/23/1996
Location:	Ramsey Family Main
Judicial Officer:	Cleary, Edward J.

Party Information

			Lead Attorneys
Intervenor	COUNTY OF RAMSEY ST PAUL, MN 55102

Petitioner	KINLEY, BARBARA A. OAKDALE, MN 55128	08/19/1967	DUNN, TIMOTHY W J Retained

Respondent	KINLEY, BARBARA A. OAKDALE, MN 55128 Removed: 12/24/2007 Ordered	08/19/1967	DUNN, TIMOTHY W J Retained

Respondent	KINLEY, BARBARA A. OAKDALE, MN 55128 Removed: 12/24/2007 Ordered	08/19/1967	DUNN, TIMOTHY W J Retained

Respondent	KINLEY, TIMOTHY C. MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109	05/26/1958	CLARK, JILL ELEANOR Retained

Events & Orders of the Court

DISPOSITIONS

12/10/1997

Default (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding)

Converted Disposition:
	Related Participants: KINLEY, TIMOTHY C.

07/21/1998

Closed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding)

Monetary Award (Status: Expired, Debtor: TIMOTHY C. KINLEY, Entered: 07/21/1998, Docketed: 07/28/1998, 1:13 PM, Original Principal: $10,346.99)

05/20/2008

Closed at filing (Judicial Officer: Bastian, Gary W.)

02/09/2009

Judgment (Judicial Officer: Ostby, Elena L.)

Monetary Award (Status: Active, Debtor: TIMOTHY C. KINLEY, Entered: 02/09/2009, Original Principal: $500.00)

02/09/2009

Judgment (Judicial Officer: Ostby, Elena L.)

Monetary Award (Status: Active, Debtor: TIMOTHY C. KINLEY, Entered: 02/09/2009, Original Principal: $500.00)

02/09/2009

Judgment (Judicial Officer: Ostby, Elena L.)

Monetary Award (Status: Active, Debtor: TIMOTHY C. KINLEY, Entered: 02/09/2009, Docketed: 03/25/2009, 8:54 AM, Original Principal: $32,403.68)

OTHER EVENTS AND HEARINGS

01/23/1996

Converted Filing Fee

01/23/1996

FLD-Case Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

01/23/1996

SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

02/16/1996

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

02/23/1996

Converted Filing Fee

02/23/1996

CRP-Certificate of Representation (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

02/26/1996

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

03/01/1996

Temporary Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Yanish, Jo Anne M.)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

03/23/1996

RSI-Review for Scheduling Information (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

04/23/1996

RSO-Review for Scheduling Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

05/23/1996

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

05/29/1996

NUL-Null Activity (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

05/30/1996

AJU-Adjudicated (Judicial Officer: Yanish, Jo Anne M. )

05/30/1996

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

05/30/1996

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

06/04/1996

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

06/14/1996

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

06/21/1996

RSO-Review for Scheduling Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

06/24/1996

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

06/28/1996

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

07/17/1996

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

07/19/1996

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

08/12/1996

FSF-Family Scheduling Form (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

08/13/1996

CANCELED Scheduling Conference (10:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Administrator, Conference)

Other

08/20/1996

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

08/20/1996

SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

08/28/1996

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

09/09/1996

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

09/25/1996

DRV-ADR Status Review (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

09/25/1996

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

09/26/1996

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

11/18/1996

JAS-Judge Assignment (Judicial Officer: Flinn, Charles A., Jr )

11/18/1996

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

11/18/1996

SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

11/18/1996

Pre-trial (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Flinn, Charles A., Jr)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

12/06/1996

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

01/03/1997

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

01/06/1997

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

01/07/1997

SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

01/27/1997

CANCELED Hearing (1:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Flinn, Charles A., Jr)

Other

02/18/1997

SPT-Schedule Pre-Trial (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

02/24/1997

CANCELED Pre-trial (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Flinn, Charles A., Jr)

Other

05/05/1997

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

05/12/1997

Pre-trial (1:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Flinn, Charles A., Jr)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

05/13/1997

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

06/03/1997

SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

06/24/1997

SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

06/24/1997

Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Flinn, Charles A., Jr)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

07/25/1997

Hearing (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Flinn, Charles A., Jr)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

07/28/1997

SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

08/15/1997

SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

08/18/1997

Court Trial (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Flinn, Charles A., Jr)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

08/19/1997

SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

08/19/1997

CANCELED Hearing (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Flinn, Charles A., Jr)

Other

09/08/1997

Hearing (1:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Flinn, Charles A., Jr)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

12/09/1997

CLO-Closed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

12/09/1997

DCR-Decree (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

12/11/1997

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

12/22/1997

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

03/09/1998

ARC-Archive (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

03/23/1998

SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

04/13/1998

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

04/13/1998

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

04/17/1998

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

04/27/1998

SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

04/28/1998

CANCELED Hearing (2:15 PM) (Judicial Officer Flinn, Charles A., Jr)

Other

05/15/1998

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

05/20/1998

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

05/21/1998

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

05/22/1998

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

05/26/1998

Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Flinn, Charles A., Jr)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

07/13/1998

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

07/21/1998

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

07/28/1998

JDG-Entry of Judgment (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

07/31/1998

NOT-Notice (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

08/12/1998

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

08/24/1998

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

01/19/1999

SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

01/26/1999

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

02/11/1999

SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

02/16/1999

CANCELED Hearing (2:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Flinn, Charles A., Jr)

Other

02/26/1999

SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

03/30/1999

CANCELED Hearing (2:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Flinn, Charles A., Jr)

Other

04/07/1999

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

04/09/1999

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

04/20/1999

Hearing (10:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Flinn, Charles A., Jr)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

05/17/1999

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

08/19/1999

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

05/01/2000

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

05/01/2000

POS-Proof of Service (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

05/01/2000

XPO-Expedited Process (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

06/08/2000

SUB-Submitted (Judicial Officer: Frias, Luz )

06/08/2000

Hearing (1:15 PM) (Judicial Officer Frias, Luz)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

06/21/2000

AJU-Adjudicated (Judicial Officer: Frias, Luz )

06/22/2000

ORS-Child Support Order (Judicial Officer: Frias, Luz )

12/03/2001

SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

02/08/2002

RAS-Reassignment (Judicial Officer: Smith, Joanne M. )

02/08/2002

UAG-Unassigned-Agreement (Judicial Officer: Flinn, Charles A., Jr )

02/25/2002

NOT-Notice (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

03/04/2002

AFF-Affidavit (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

03/06/2002

NOT-Notice (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

03/11/2002

SUB-Submitted (Judicial Officer: Smith, Joanne M. )

03/11/2002

Hearing (2:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Smith, Joanne M.)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

03/12/2002

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

04/15/2002

AJU-Adjudicated (Judicial Officer: Smith, Joanne M. )

04/16/2002

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

04/17/2002

LTR-Letters (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

04/22/2002

LTR-Letters (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

04/30/2002

MTN-Motion Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

04/30/2002

POS-Proof of Service (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

04/30/2002

XPO-Expedited Process (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

05/23/2002

NOT-Notice (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

06/04/2002

LTR-Letters (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

06/05/2002

LTR-Letters (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

06/12/2002

LTR-Letters (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

06/25/2002

UAG-Unassigned-Agreement (Judicial Officer: Smith, Joanne M. )

07/02/2002

RAS-Reassignment (Judicial Officer: VanDeNorth, John B., Jr. )

07/12/2002

NOT-Notice (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

07/12/2002

POS-Proof of Service (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

07/12/2002

SUB-Submitted (Judicial Officer: Wray, Tsippi )

07/12/2002

XPO-Expedited Process (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

07/12/2002

Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Wray, Tsippi)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

07/13/2002

AJU-Adjudicated (Judicial Officer: Wray, Tsippi )

07/13/2002

ORS-Child Support Order (Judicial Officer: Wray, Tsippi )

07/16/2002

CANCELED Hearing (2:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Magistrate, Child Support)

Other

07/18/2002

NOT-Notice (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

07/29/2002

DCS-Dismiss Child Support (Judicial Officer: Frias, Luz )

07/11/2003

SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

08/26/2003

AFF-Affidavit (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

08/26/2003

MTN-Motion Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

08/27/2003

LTR-Letters (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

08/27/2003

RAS-Reassignment (Judicial Officer: DeCourcy, Michael T. )

08/27/2003

UAG-Unassigned-Agreement (Judicial Officer: VanDeNorth, John B., Jr. )

09/09/2003

CANCELED Hearing (1:30 PM) (Judicial Officer DeCourcy, Michael T.)

Other

12/01/2003

SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

12/02/2003

SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

12/05/2003

MTN-Motion Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

01/12/2004

CANCELED Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer DeCourcy, Michael T.)

Other

02/09/2004

MTN-Motion Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

02/17/2004

AFF-Affidavit (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

02/23/2004

Hearing (10:00 AM) (Judicial Officer DeCourcy, Michael T.)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

04/15/2004

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

04/19/2004

AJU-Adjudicated (Judicial Officer: DeCourcy, Michael T. )

04/19/2004

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

04/30/2004

POS-Proof of Service (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

04/30/2004

XPO-Expedited Process (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

05/06/2004

RAS-Reassignment (Judicial Officer: Bastian, Gary W. )

05/06/2004

UAG-Unassigned-Agreement (Judicial Officer: DeCourcy, Michael T. )

06/08/2004

NOT-Notice (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

06/11/2004

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

06/16/2004

SUB-Submitted (Judicial Officer: Moriarity, Michael )

06/16/2004

Hearing (2:20 PM) (Judicial Officer Moriarity, Michael)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

07/08/2004

AJU-Adjudicated (Judicial Officer: Moriarity, Michael )

07/08/2004

ORS-Child Support Order (Judicial Officer: Moriarity, Michael )

08/09/2004

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

08/10/2004

SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

08/15/2004

RVW-Case Status Review (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

11/09/2004

CANCELED Hearing (1:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Bastian, Gary W.)

Other

12/29/2004

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

01/03/2005

AFF-Affidavit (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

01/06/2005

CANCELED Hearing (2:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Bastian, Gary W.)

Other

02/17/2005

POS-Proof of Service (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

02/17/2005

XPO-Expedited Process (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

03/04/2005

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

03/10/2005

Hearing (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Bastian, Gary W.)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

03/23/2005

AJU-Adjudicated (Judicial Officer: Anderson, Ronelle )

03/23/2005

ORS-Child Support Order (Judicial Officer: Anderson, Ronelle )

03/23/2005

SUB-Submitted (Judicial Officer: Anderson, Ronelle )

03/23/2005

Hearing (10:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Anderson, Ronelle)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

04/18/2005

Hearing (2:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Bastian, Gary W.)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

05/09/2005

SUB-Submitted (Judicial Officer: Bastian, Gary W. )

05/10/2005

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

05/16/2005

SUB-Submitted (Judicial Officer: Bastian, Gary W. )

07/12/2005

CANCELED Hearing (10:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Bastian, Gary W.)

Other

08/08/2005

AJU-Adjudicated (Judicial Officer: Bastian, Gary W. )

08/08/2005

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

08/12/2005

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

08/12/2005

LTR-Letters (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

09/16/2005

SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

09/21/2005

MTN-Motion Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

10/07/2005

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

11/02/2005

MTN-Motion Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

11/15/2005

CANCELED Hearing (2:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Bastian, Gary W.)

Other

11/18/2005

NOT-Notice (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

01/13/2006

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

01/19/2006

Hearing (3:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Bastian, Gary W.)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

02/03/2006

SUB-Submitted (Judicial Officer: Bastian, Gary W. )

02/22/2006

AJU-Adjudicated (Judicial Officer: Bastian, Gary W. )

02/22/2006

CLO-Closed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

02/22/2006

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

02/28/2006

POS-Proof of Service (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

02/28/2006

XPO-Expedited Process (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

03/27/2006

POS-Proof of Service (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

03/27/2006

XPO-Expedited Process (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

03/28/2006

AJU-Adjudicated (Judicial Officer: Anderson, Ronelle )

03/28/2006

CLO-Closed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

03/28/2006

ORS-Child Support Order (Judicial Officer: Anderson, Ronelle )

03/28/2006

SUB-Submitted (Judicial Officer: Anderson, Ronelle )

03/28/2006

Hearing (8:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Anderson, Ronelle)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

04/07/2006

MCC-Motion for Correct (Judicial Officer: Anderson, Ronelle )

04/07/2006

POS-Proof of Service (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

04/14/2006

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

04/17/2006

SUB-Submitted (Judicial Officer: Anderson, Ronelle )

04/20/2006

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

04/24/2006

AFF-Affidavit (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

04/24/2006

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

04/26/2006

AJU-Adjudicated (Judicial Officer: Anderson, Ronelle )

04/26/2006

CLO-Closed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

04/26/2006

NUL-Null Activity (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

04/26/2006

ORS-Child Support Order (Judicial Officer: Anderson, Ronelle )

04/26/2006

ORS-Child Support Order (Judicial Officer: Anderson, Ronelle )

04/26/2006

SUB-Submitted (Judicial Officer: Anderson, Ronelle )

04/26/2006

Hearing (10:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Anderson, Ronelle)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

05/15/2006

NOT-Notice (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

05/23/2006

NOA-Notice of Appeal (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

05/23/2006

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

06/05/2006

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

06/15/2006

RVW-Case Status Review (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

06/22/2006

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

07/08/2006

CLO-Closed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

07/08/2006

CLO-Closed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

07/08/2006

NOT-Notice (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

07/10/2006

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

08/24/2006

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

08/30/2006

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

08/30/2006

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

08/30/2006

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

09/13/2006

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

09/13/2006

TSC-Transcript Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

09/15/2006

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

09/15/2006

TSC-Transcript Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

10/16/2006

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

10/17/2006

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

10/17/2006

TSC-Transcript Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

10/27/2006

CLO-Closed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

10/27/2006

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

11/20/2006

NOT-Notice (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

11/20/2006

POS-Proof of Service (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

12/11/2006

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

12/11/2006

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

12/13/2006

LTR-Letters (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

12/14/2006

NOT-Notice (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

12/14/2006

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

12/18/2006

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

12/18/2006

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

12/19/2006

SUB-Submitted (Judicial Officer: Flynn, Mary H. C. )

12/19/2006

CANCELED Hearing (1:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Magistrate, Child Support)

Other

12/19/2006

Hearing (1:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Flynn, Mary H. C.)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

01/02/2007

AJU-Adjudicated (Judicial Officer: Flynn, Mary H. C. )

01/02/2007

CLO-Closed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

01/02/2007

ORS-Child Support Order (Judicial Officer: Flynn, Mary H. C. )

01/16/2007

CANCELED Hearing (2:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Magistrate, Child Support)

Other

02/02/2007

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

04/03/2007

NOT-Notice (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

05/23/2007

SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

06/11/2007

MTN-Motion Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

06/11/2007

OSC-Order to Show Cause (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

07/05/2007

NOT-Notice (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

07/11/2007

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

07/16/2007

AFF-Affidavit (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

09/19/2007

Appellate Court Order

09/21/2007

Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel

09/21/2007

Affidavit of Service

09/24/2007

Affidavit-Other

09/25/2007

Hearing (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Bastian, Gary W.)

09/25/2007

Reset by Court to 09/25/2007

Result: Held

09/27/2007

Order-Other (Judicial Officer: Bastian, Gary W. )

10/22/2007

Findings and Order (Judicial Officer: Bastian, Gary W. )

10/30/2007

Notice of Filing of Order

11/06/2007

Motion and Affidavit

11/07/2007

CANCELED Motion Hearing (10:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Bastian, Gary W.)

Other

11/16/2007

Appellate Court Order

11/20/2007

Order-Other (Judicial Officer: Johnson, Gregg E. )

12/11/2007

Other Document

12/21/2007

Order Discharging Guardian Ad Litem (Judicial Officer: Bastian, Gary W. )

12/24/2007

Notice of Case Filing

12/24/2007

Order Denying In Forma Pauperis Petition (Judicial Officer: Finley,John T. , )

12/24/2007

Affidavit for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis

12/24/2007

Motion

01/11/2008

Appellate Court Order

02/22/2008

Notice of Hearing

03/20/2008

Order-Other (Judicial Officer: Anderson, Russell A. )

04/17/2008

Notice of Hearing

05/06/2008

Order to Show Cause Hearing (10:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Bastian, Gary W.)

Result: Held

05/12/2008

Notice of Case Filing

05/14/2008

Other Document

05/20/2008

Order-Other (Judicial Officer: Bastian, Gary W. )

05/22/2008

Notice for Implementation of Cost of Living Adjustment

05/23/2008

Appellate Court Order (Judicial Officer: Toussaint, Edward, Jr. )

06/03/2008

Notice of Case Assignment

06/12/2008

Notice to Remove (Judicial Officer: Beddow, Earl F., Jr. )

06/26/2008

Certificate on Notice of Removal/Affidavit of Prejudice (Judicial Officer: Beddow, Earl F., Jr. )

06/26/2008

Notice of Case Assignment

07/09/2008

Affidavit for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis

07/09/2008

Order for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis (Judicial Officer: Ostby, Elena L. )

07/15/2008

Notice of Motion and Affidavit

07/28/2008

Converted Pending Activity (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

08/28/2008

Notice of Hearing

11/05/2008

Affidavit-Other

11/05/2008

Other Document

11/05/2008

Affidavit of Service

11/10/2008

Order to Show Cause Hearing (2:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Ostby, Elena L.)

11/10/2008

Reset by Court to 11/10/2008

Result: Held

11/10/2008

Taken Under Advisement (Judicial Officer: Ostby, Elena L. )

11/20/2008

Notice of Case Filing

11/20/2008

Correspondence

11/20/2008

Other Document

12/04/2008

Order Denying In Forma Pauperis Petition (Judicial Officer: Ostby, Elena L. )

12/04/2008

Affidavit for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis

12/11/2008

Appellate Court Order (Judicial Officer: Toussaint, Edward, Jr. )

01/13/2009

Notice of Hearing

02/02/2009

Affidavit-Other

02/02/2009

Affidavit of Service

02/03/2009

CANCELED Order to Show Cause Hearing (2:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Ostby, Elena L.)

Settled

02/03/2009

Reset by Court to 02/03/2009

02/09/2009

Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order (Judicial Officer: Ostby, Elena L. )

02/09/2009

Processed Judgment Entry

02/09/2009

Notice of Entry of Judgment

02/09/2009

Processed Judgment Entry

02/09/2009

Notice of Entry of Judgment

02/09/2009

Processed Judgment Entry

02/09/2009

Notice of Entry of Judgment

02/12/2009

Notice of Filing of Order

02/12/2009

Affidavit of Service

03/24/2009

Affidavit of Identification

03/25/2009

Processed Judgment Docketing

03/25/2009

Notice of Docketing of Judgment

04/14/2009

Order Denying In Forma Pauperis Petition (Judicial Officer: Ostby, Elena L. )

04/14/2009

Affidavit for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis

04/14/2009

Motion

04/15/2009

Notice of Case Filing

05/01/2009

Appellate Court Order (Judicial Officer: Toussaint, Edward, Jr. )

05/13/2009

Order Denying In Forma Pauperis Petition (Judicial Officer: Ostby, Elena L. )

05/13/2009

Motion

05/13/2009

Affidavit for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis

05/22/2009

Appellate Court Order (Judicial Officer: Toussaint, Edward, Jr. )

06/12/2009

Notice of Motion and Motion

06/12/2009

Affidavit-Other

06/12/2009

Affidavit of Service

06/17/2009

Notice-Other

06/26/2009

Notice of Hearing

08/31/2009

Affidavit-Other

08/31/2009

Affidavit of Service

09/02/2009

Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel

09/02/2009

Correspondence

09/03/2009

Motion Hearing (1:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Cleary, Edward J.)

07/02/2009	Reset by Court to 07/02/2009
07/02/2009	Reset by Court to 09/03/2009

Result: Held

09/15/2009

Order-Other (Judicial Officer: Cleary, Edward J. )

09/15/2009

Other Document

09/15/2009

Order-Other (Judicial Officer: Cleary, Edward J. )

09/15/2009

Order-Other (Judicial Officer: Cleary, Edward J. )

09/15/2009

Warrant Issued

09/16/2009

Correspondence

09/16/2009

Affidavit of Service

09/29/2009

Notice of Filing of Order

09/29/2009

Affidavit of Service

10/07/2009

Correspondence

11/05/2009

Order-Other (Judicial Officer: Montgomery, Ann )

11/23/2009

Warrant Returned

11/25/2009

Order-Other (Judicial Officer: Cleary, Edward J. )

12/21/2009

Correspondence

12/21/2009

Notice of Appearance

12/21/2009

Motion

12/21/2009

Correspondence

12/24/2009

Notice-Other

01/25/2010

Motion Hearing (10:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Cleary, Edward J.)

Financial Information



	Obligor KINLEY, TIMOTHY C.
	Total Financial Assessment			235.00
	Total Payments and Credits			235.00
	Balance Due as of 01/07/2010			0.00

11/07/2007	Transaction Assessment			55.00
11/07/2007	Counter Payment	Receipt # FM62-2007-01644	KINLEY, TIMOTHY C.	(55.00)
07/15/2008	Transaction Assessment			55.00
07/15/2008	Counter Payment	Receipt # FM62-2008-04419	KINLEY, TIMOTHY C.	(55.00)
04/09/2009	Transaction Assessment			20.00
04/09/2009	Counter Payment	Receipt # FM62-2009-02614	KINLEY, TIMOTHY C.	(20.00)
05/12/2009	Transaction Assessment			5.00
05/12/2009	Counter Payment	Receipt # FM62-2009-03566	KINLEY, TIMOTHY C.	(5.00)
12/24/2009	Transaction Assessment			100.00
12/24/2009	Mail Payment	Receipt # FM62-2009-09142	CLARK, JILL ELEANOR	(100.00)



	Petitioner KINLEY, BARBARA A.
	Total Financial Assessment			10.00
	Total Payments and Credits			10.00
	Balance Due as of 01/07/2010			0.00

04/29/2009	Transaction Assessment			10.00
04/29/2009	Counter Payment	Receipt # FM62-2009-03207	KINLEY, BARBARA A.	(10.00)

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Gearins Unallotment “Files”62cv09-11693_62cv09-1163(Vandenorth)

December 31, 2009 by sharon4anderson

Disclaimer Affiant demand pdf Forensic Files 62cv09-1163(Vandenorth)AppealA09-2031(Toussaint) www.taxthemax.blogspot.com

Pay Fines Online Fees Court Forms Find Court Calendars Access to Trial Court Records Appellate Court Records and Opinions Rule

<!– –>

High-Profile and Multi-District Litigation Cases Ramsey Co. District Court pdf Files while www.mncourts.gov does not>
In this section:

Print Friendly Version

Text size:

Judicial Branch Home > 2nd Home > News / About Us > High-Profile and Multi-District Litigation Cases >

2009 Unallotment Litigation:

62-CV-09-11693:
Multiple Parties v. Governor of MN, et al

Documents

December 30, 2009
Motion for Temporary Restraining Order – Granted retroactive to 11/1/2009 – See Document
Amended Order – See Document

November 23, 2009
Affidavit of Service – See Document

November 20, 2009
Briefs – See Document
Affidavit – Other with Exhibits – See Document

November 17, 2009
Affidavit of Service - See Document

November 16, 2009
Plaintiffs Reply Memo in Support of TRO - See Document
Amended Class Action Complaint – See Document

November 12, 2009
Affidavit of Service – See Document
Affidavit Other with Exhibits MO – See Document
Affidavit Other with Exhibits PR = See Document
Defendants Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss – See Document
Defendants Memo. in Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion for TRO – See Document
Defendants Certifcate of Representation – See Document

November 6, 2009
Affidavit of Service - See Document
Affidavit of Service - See Document
Notice of Motion and Motion for Temproary Restraining Order See Document
Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs Motion for Temporary Restraining Order See Document

November 3, 2009
Affidavit of Service - See Document
Summons and Complaint – See Document
Certificate of Representation and Parties See Document

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »

Sharons Informal Brief re: FIAFEA_FIRREA_A09-2031

December 26, 2009 by sharon4anderson

Flo rida: Fraudulent Notices of Federal Tax Lien – a matter for the Statewide Grand Jury. – Lawmen | Google Groups State Court Administrator’s Office Sue Dosal
(651) 296-2474 (phone) (651) 297-5636 (fax)
Send an email via our contact form Minnesota Judicial Center (MJC)
Suite #: 135_25 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
FAX TRANSMITTAL INFORMAL BRIEF QUITAM_RELATOR

fiafea & firrea – Google Search

FIAFEA FIRREA Banking Regulations – Google Search

Legal Published E-Service: Ed.Toussaint’sCovert OrderTitle18s1951 Ramsey Dist.Crt.File 62cv09-1163(Vandenorth) Appellate A09-2031(ToussaintSt. Paul, MN 5515 www.slideshare.com/sharon4anderson and www.scribd.com/sharon4anderson

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY E-COMMERCE AND FAX:

TO: Ramsey Co. Clerk of Court, Lynae.Olson@courts.state.mn.us tel:651-266-8255 F 266-8263 mary.jurek@courts.state.mn.us

2nd Jud.Court Admin. Larry.Dease@courts.state.mn.us 651-266-8266 F 266-8278

Sheriff: bob.fletcher@co.ramsey.mn.us 651-266-9333 F 266-9301

Elections@co.ramsey.mn.us mark.oswald@co.ramsey.mn.us 651-266-2171 F 266-2177

Susan Gaertner rca@co.ramsey.mn.us jean.stepan@co.ramsey.mn.us 266-3222 F 266-3010

Lori Swanson MN_AG attorney.general@state.mn.us 651-296-3353 F 282-2155

St.Paul City Clerk shari.moore@ci.stpaul.mn.us 651-266-8688 F 266-8574

and all others as their interest appear.

FROM: Sharon4Mayor@aol.com http://taxthemax.blogspot.com 651-776-5835

FAX VIA OUTGOING: SHARON CANNOT RECEIVE FAXES

IN COURT APPEALS STATE OF MINNESOTA

A09-2031(Toussaint)-A06-1150(Russell Anderson)-C6-88-859(Huspenie) etal 62CV09-11693(Gearin) Ramsey Dist Crt. Example

Appellant-QuiTam-Relator Sharon4Anderson’s

Informal Brief pdf Format

62cv09-1163(Vandenorth)SumJudg8Sept09 Ed.Toussaint’sCovert OrderTitle18s1951
QuoWarranto A06 1150 30 Jun06

STATE OF MINNESOTA,ALL AGENCIES, REVENUE,Ward Einess COMMERCE, Glenn Wilson,PUBLIC SAFETY,Michael Campion,CITY ST.PAUL,Kathy Lantry,COUNTY RAMSEY,AUDITOR MARK OSWALD, Elections/Taxes Supervisor, Canvass Board,
State of Minnesota, Rule 24.04 by and thro State Attorney General Lori
Swanson www.ag.state.mn.us, Michael Campion, Public Safety,Larry Dease,Court Administrator,St.Paul
Mayor Chris B. Coleman,City Clerk Shari Moore,Council President Kathy Lantry et al,
www.ci.stpaul.mn.us, Janice Rettman res: No 2009-012,Toni Carter Canvass Board
and County Commissioners, www.co.ramsey.mn.us DSI Bob Kessler,Joel Essling John Harrington Chief Police,his agents , Kathy Wuorinen,Don Luna,Tanya Hunter, Aaron Foster, Police Impound Lot, Rapid Towing et al in
their Official Capacitys, Individually,Severally, acting in concort with John Doe
and Mary Roe. SCAP,Judges Kathleen Gearin,Joanne Smith,Gregg
Johnson,Salvador Rosas,Larry Cohen et al, unk at this time 1988 Files 495722 499129 Default 66
Million Dollars. In re Scarrella4 Assoc. Justice 221NW 2nd 562 Plaintiffs
V.

http://eastsidereviewnews.1upprelaunch.com/SiteImages/FileGallery/Ramsey_Co_Tax_03-18-09_208.pdf

Page 53_697 SURREY AVE 32.29.22.41.0053$2,499.43
St.Paul,MN.55106 ,Intestate Decedant James R. Anderson et al,
www.cpljimanderson.blogspot.com ,VA Widow,Senior,Disabled Political Activist
Sharon Anderson aka Peterson_Chergosky_Scarrella
www.sharon4staterep64a.blogspot.com http://sharon4council.blogspot.com
http://sharon4privateattorneygeneral.blogspot.com + 101 Blogs
www.sharon4anderson.org , et al as their interest appear , Defendants and
3rd Party Plaintiffs,Intestate Decedants Tenant in Common Wm.O and Bernice
A.Peterson. Title to Sharons Cars,Trailers,Peterbilt,Realestate in Fee Simple AbsoluteNotice: Ins.Claim Stolen 91 Chrysler V-1C4GY54R5MX597169 Defendants: 3rd Party Plaintiffs www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

1.
Interpretation of a statute is a question of law, and an appellate court’s review is unlimited. Accordingly when determining a question of law, the appellate court is not bound by the trial court’s interpretation of a statute. or Denial of MN Const.Art.X and Separation of Powers Art. III

MS 279 stating “lacked merit”
279 – DELINQUENT REAL ESTATE TAXES, 2008 Minnesota Statutes

Affiants Answer/Cross 4 1/2 Million Dollars, overlooked,misapplied by Judge John Vandenorth

in a “Patterned Enterprise” of Judicial Fraud upon the Citizenery

http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/stpaul-issues/files/f/1679-2007-07-08T193758Z/5Jul07RatAssLegal_22.pdf July 5th,2007

2.
When construing a statute, a court should give words in common usage their natural and ordinary meaning. MS429.061
429.061, 2009 Minnesota Statutes Theft,Trespass,Treason is NOT IMPROVEMENT.

Sharon4Anderson v. City St.Paul taking 91 Chrysler – Google Search

Cop- Corruption-Minnesota: Notice: Ins.Claim Stolen 91 Chrysler V-1C4GY54R5MX597169

The fundamental rule to which all other rules are subordinate is that the intent of the legislature governs if that intent can be ascertained. When language is plain and unambiguous, there is no need to resort to statutory construction. An appellate court merely interprets the language as it appears; it is not free to speculate and cannot read into the statute language not readily found there.

MS 645.Canons of Construction Lower Court Vandenorth Treasonable Act’s

4.
If a city or county governing body has a two-thirds majority vote of its membership, it may modify a recommendation from its planning commission without first returning the proposal to the commission.
or in MN Issues of MS609.43 Misconduct of Public Officials to exploit the Seniors,Elderly,Vunerable Homeowners

in their Bizzare Taxing Methods of Illegal Fees/Assessments by Theft,Trespass,Treason? in this RICO Case for over 25 years…..re: C6-88-859 (Doris Huspeni) with Clerk Chris Coleman, now City St.Paul Mayor.

www.sharonswater.blogspot.com

5.
Under the facts of this case, the Board of County Commissioners’ alleged Administrative Hearing without “due process” or Civil/Criminal S&C triggering Constitutional Challenge of Jurisdiction/Authority of Judge John Vandenorth File 62cv09-1163,amendment’s published 2008 Tax Delinquency’s was a legislative action.

Quitam Relator Sharon4Anderson is the only homeowner to challenge out of 3 thousand propertys?

giving rise to Major Corruption in the State of Minnesota,City of St.Paul and County of Ramsey

Google Lawmen Cases MN 62cv09-1163 « Sharon4anderson’s Weblog

6.
Aesthetics and conformance with a governing body’s comprehensive plan may be considered as bases for zoning and Tax rulings.

42 USC 3631
7.
Zoning is not to be based upon a plebiscite of the neighbors; neighborhood objections alone are not legally sufficient to support land use regulation. Nevertheless, their views remain a consideration in a governing body’s ultimate decision.

8.
A county-wide ”takings” “Condemnations” by Water,Electric Shutoff , Stalking causing Fractured Ankle, taking 91 Chrysler, Trailer, Contents, Porta Potty by Theft, Trespass,Treason since 1988 Ramsey Dist. File 495722 and 66 Million Default Judgment File no 499129 giving rise to AFFIDAVITS OF PREJUDICE AGAINST NOW CHIEFAffidavitPrejudice K athleen Gearin Judge

JUDGE KATHLEEN GEARINSCAP

IN her capacity-conflict as Commitment Judge, triggering DEATH,DISABILITY,DISPARAGMENT OF TITLES AND

on all citizens in a “protected class” of Social Security Receipants, Disability, in the instant case is unreasonable per se and therefore improper. Summary Judgment taken without

Evidentary Hearings, List of Witness’s

62CV-09-11693
Amicus 20brief 9.
The district court is vested with broad discretion in supervising the course and scope of discovery.

10.
In actions to review the final zoning decision of a governing body, the admission of evidence not presented to the governing body is subject to the district court’s discretion.
11.
Although strongly encouraged, a governing body is not required to make formal findings of fact concerning its decisions regulating land use. It is more important that there exists a record of what the governing body considered before making its decision so that the reviewing court is not left in a quandary as to why the decision was made.
12.
The test for determining whether a state law violates the Contract Clause of the United States Constitution is: (1) whether the state law has, in fact, operated as a substantial impairment of a contractual relationship; (2) whether there is a significant

and legitimate public purpose behind the legislation; and (3) whether the adjustment of the contracting parties’ rights and responsibilities is based upon reasonable conditions and is of a character appropriate to the public purpose justifying the legislation’s adoption.
13.
Despite a court finding of substantial impairment of a contractual relationship, legislation may still be upheld under an analysis of the Contract Clause of the United States Constitution if there is a significant and legitimate public purpose behind the legislation and if the adjustments to the contracting parties’ rights and responsibilities are based upon reasonable conditions and are of a character appropriate to the public purpose justifying the legislation’s adoption.

14.
For the threshold issue in an analysis of the Contract Clause of the United States Constitution—whether the regulation has, in fact, operated as a substantial impairment of a contractual relationship—a court must consider whether the industry the complaining party has entered has been regulated in the past. This consideration is required because one whose rights, such as they are, are subject to state restriction, cannot remove them from the power of the State by making a contract about them.
15.
In an analysis of the Contract Clause of the United States Constitution, whether the adjustment of rights and responsibilities of contracting parties is based upon reasonable conditions and is of a character appropriate to the public purpose justifying the legislation’s adoption, the courts properly defer to legislative judgment as to the necessity and reasonableness of a particular measure when the State is not a contracting party.
16.
An appellate court review of whether a board of county commissioners’ resolution is preempted by statute is, like interpretation of statutes and ordinances, a question of law. The standard of review is therefore unlimited.
17.
State law preemption of a particular field cannot be implied but must be expressed by a clear statement in the law.
18.
There is a presumption that the legislature does not intend to enact useless or meaningless legislation.

19.
Absent an express statement by Congress that state law is preempted, federal preemption occurs where (1) there is an actual conflict between federal and state law; (2) where compliance with both federal and state law is, in effect, physically impossible; (3) where Congress has occupied the entire field of regulation and leaves no room for states to supplement federal law; or (4) when the state law stands as an obstacle to the accomplishment and execution of the full objectives of Congress.
20.
In the absence of express preemption in a federal law, there is a strong presumption that Congress did not intend to displace state law.

APPELLANT_QUITAM_RELATOR SHARED ISSUES:

1. Did the district court err in determining that the City Council and Ramsey Co. Board’s decision “takings” by Theft,Trespass,Treason without Improvements on Homestead, Disabled Property Owners, amending the taxing regulations by Illegal Fees/Assessment, Summary Abatements without “due process” was lawful, i.e., that it did violate the

42 USC 3631

2. Did the district court err with Libel with Malice in determining that the Full Taxes of Homestead Property at 697 Surrey, 2008 were paid and that Title is in the name of Decedant James R. Anderson et al and

decision amending the online banking statement of regulations was reasonable?

Property taxes paid $949.86 Property taxes paid

Sharon paid taxes 697 Surrey Ave St.Paul MN 2008 – Google Search

SharonsSanction Attorneys_Fraud on Court

697Surrey3May09_15.pdfGreen23

No.4. Did the district court err in dismissing the claim alleging that the property taxes for 697 Surrey 2008 were paid in full? Judge John Vandenorty complicity with Auditor Mark Oswald to violate the Contract Clause of the United States Constitution? YES.

ISSUES:
5. Did the district court CRIMINALLY err by having a Student Attorney who failed to research the Case in its entirety alleging preemption of the Bank and Wire Fraud regulation’s amendment by Fraud unpon the Court and Fraud on the United States of America on a Protected Class of Citizens. Techinally Repealing State Laws thus Treason YES.

6. Did the district court err in dismissing Attorney Pro Se’s pdf. Forensic Files to expose Major Corruption of the Judgescomplicit with Auditor, and DFL Gubnatorial Cadidate, Ramsey Co Attorney Susan Gaertner who is claiming alleging preemption of the Banking laws and regulation amendments by federal law? YES

Memorandumn

Bill Dahn’s Banking Regulations Morton Ave St.Paul MN – Google Search

Concurrent with the release of A09-2031 Order (toussaint) court has ordered Affiant to submit Informal brief on certain questions raised in the issues originally presented on appeal by both Plaintiff State of Minnesota and Respondant.

Those original issues are: whether the district court erred in Summary Judgment dismissing the claims alleging that the taxing decision’s amending the regulations violated the Takings Clause and the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. YES.

Minnesota’s Strike Force “taking” our Cars for Profit, involving Aaron Foster, Manager of

St.Paul Police Impound Lot, without Public Improvements, taxing to forclosure

without Tickets,Warrants,Approval to Prosecute

Bill Dahn: USDist02-0332(Rosenbaum)(FIAFEA&FIRREA)
LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Sharon4 Anderson – Google Profile Candidate AG2010 www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com Blogger: User Profile: Sharon Anderson

SharonsYahoo! iGoogle

Bill Dahn: Bud Shaver Stole Bill’sCampaign Bus?
Our order requiring supplemental briefing on takings necessarily stays our resolution of the following issues originally presented on appeal by Intervenors: whether the district court erred in dismissing their claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) and inverse condemnation.

FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT AT THIS TIME

EXCEPT ACCESS TO THE COURTS MUST BE IN PDF FORMAT, FORENSIC FILES FOR PUBLIC

SCRUNITY.

These Criminal Charges against the State do not have to have Filing Fees,

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Sharons QuoWarranto v. MN Judge Edward Toussaint A09-2031

December 23, 2009 by sharon4anderson

Wed. 23Dec09

AFFIDAVIT OF E:SERVICE:BYSHARON SCARRELLA ANDERSON, ATTORNEY PRO SE,QUITAM

MN Judges violation of Citizenery Civil,Constitutional Rights – Google Search

TO: The Above named :Sue Dosal,Staff,Court Employees in their Official Capacities, Severally, Individually, John Doe and Mary Roe. State Court Administrator’s Office

**AFFIANT: Sharon reserves the Right to Quo Warranto re: Toussaints Order dtd.7Dec09 A09-2031 to join with A06-1150 re: My Presentations on SlideShare RICO Charges.**
Sue Dosal, State Court Administrator	Sue Dosal serves as the State Court Administrator of the Minnesota Judicial State Court Administrator’s Office Branch. She was appointed to this position on July 16, 1982. Prior to her appointment she served as Senior Staff Attorney for the National Center for State Courts, Deputy State Court Administrator for the state of Florida, Staff Director of the Florida Legislature’s Joint Select Committee on Judicial Personnel, AFFIANTS NOTE: Florida: Fraudulent Notices of Federal Tax Lien – a matter for the Statewide Grand Jury. – Lawmen \| Google Groups State Court Administrator’s Office (651) 296-2474 (phone) (651) 297-5636 (fax) Send an email via our contact form Minnesota Judicial Center (MJC) Suite #: 135 25 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. St. Paul, MN 5515

  Legal Published E-Service: Ed.Toussaint’sCovert OrderTitle18s1951 Ramsey Dist.Crt.File 62cv09-1163(Vandenorth) Appellate A09-2031(Toussaint)

FAX TRANSMITTAL Resubmit Sat.19Dec09 23Dec09

  AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY E-COMMERCE AND FAX:SHARON ANDERSON CHARGES MARK OSWALD and others

                                                   COUNT I Title 18 sec.1951 HRA charging off Loan to Selective Contractors ie: Sherman Associates.

City of St. Paul, MN – Official Website – Council

                                                    COUNT II Title 26 sec 1602 Tax Credits

                                    COUNT III Loan Forgiveness re: MN Const. Art X.

                                     COUNT IV RICO Pattern of HRA and City’s Bizzare Taxing Scheme, contrary to MN Constitution,  and State Crim Code MS 609.xx

                                                609 – CRIMINAL CODE, 2009 Minnesota Statutes

http://stpaul.granicus.com/AgendaViewer.php?view_id=37&event_id=119 Challenge in its Entirety,

                               “taking” without Public Hearing.



                           Relator admits to Published Order by Chief Appellate Judge Edward Toussaint dtd.7Dec09, Affiant found Published today.

                               www.slideshare.com/sharon4anderson



Florida: Fraudulent Notices of Federal Tax Lien – a matter for the Statewide Grand Jury. – Lawmen | Google Groups US CODE: Title 18,1030. Fraud and related activity in connection with computers

      TO: Ramsey Co. Clerk of Court, Lynae.Olson@courts.state.mn.us tel:651-266-8255 F 266-8263 mary.jurek@courts.state.mn.us

          2nd Jud.Court Admin.          Larry.Dease@courts.state.mn.us      651-266-8266 F 266-8278

          Sheriff:                                  bob.fletcher@co.ramsey.mn.us          651-266-9333 F 266-9301

          Elections@co.ramsey.mn.us mark.oswald@co.ramsey.mn.us        651-266-2171 F 266-2177

          Susan Gaertner rca@co.ramsey.mn.us jean.stepan@co.ramsey.mn.us 266-3222 F 266-3010

          Lori Swanson MN_AG           attorney.general@state.mn.us             651-296-3353 F 282-2155

          St.Paul City Clerk                 shari.moore@ci.stpaul.mn.us               651-266-8688 F 266-8574

                                     and all others as their interest appear.

FROM: Sharon4Mayor@aol.com   http://taxthemax.blogspot.com              651-776-5835

                      FAX VIA OUTGOING: SHARON CANNOT RECEIVE FAXES

CANDIDATE AttorneyGeneral www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com  SHARON ANDERSON CHARGES MARK OSWALD and others

WITH TITLE 18S1030 RE: Taxes/Elections, Challenges the City St.Paul,MN Agenda 23Dec09 in its Entirety

42 USC 3631 MS 2.724 Disclaimer: Sharon has been reduced to Poverty, QuiTam Whistleblower In Fact her new Medicare now “takes” 140.10 for Insurance and 14.40 for Prescriptions?

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299

telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Sharon4 Anderson – Google Profile Candidate AG2010 www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com Blogger: User Profile: Sharon Anderson

Homestead Act of 1862 Twitter / Sharon4Anderson Shar1058’s Buzz Activity Page – My Buzz Activity – Yahoo! Buzz neopopulism.org – Pro Se Dec Action Litigation Pack Sharon4Anderson | Scribd Document’s are based on SEC filings, Blogger: Dashboard Home |

SharonsYahoo! iGoogle

telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Sharon4 Anderson – Google Profile Candidate AG2010 www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com Blogger: User Profile: Sharon Anderson

SharonsYahoo! iGoogle

Legal Notice to the State of MN, Revenue,All Agencies, County of Ramsey,Mark.Oswald,Risk Management,Land Acquistion et al,City St.Paul,Mayor Coleman,DSI Bob Kessler,Joel Essling,Risk Management Ron.Guilfoile,HRA,Kathy Lantry,City Council enbanc,Shari.Moore Clerk,Marcia Moermond et al
East Side Review News alleged to be Tax Delinquent. 62cv09-1163

Interesting MN Court Administrator Sue Dosal Husband former MN Fed. Court Clerk

with “Tys” to Florida

re:



Today’s Topic Summary

Group: http://groups.google.com/group/lawmen/topics

Florida: Fraudulent Notices of Federal Tax Lien – a matter for the Statewide Grand Jury. [1 Update]

Tom Cryer sues Rebecca O’Dell for Defamation [1 Update]

Topic: Florida: Fraudulent Notices of Federal Tax Lien – a matter for the Statewide Grand Jury.

“Bob Hurt” <bob@bobhurt.com> Dec 22 07:22PM -0500 ^

Remedies for Fraudulent Notices of Federal Tax Lien in Florida

Florida Statutes <http://leg.state.fl.us/Statutes> provide possible remedies for fraudulent notices of tax lien.

28.222 requires the clerk to KNOW US LAW regarding federal tax liens and levies and to record federal tax liens ONLY if made in accordance with that law. The clerks don’t know anything about US law, and the county attorneys falsely inform them from IRS booklets made just to suborn clerks. You could point out that a lien notice has no validity unless a duly authorized assessment officer signed (under penalties of perjury) the assessment that forms the basis for the lien. I have NEVER seen such an assessment document signed under penalties of perjury that it is a bona fide and accurate assessment of taxes owed, due, and payable

713.31 – Remedies for fraud and collusion – worth looking at – treble damages.

713.901 (4) requires the certification of notices of liens (see IRS 7806 and 6065 and examine any lien notice for proper certification) by a “responsible” person (where’s the proof that the submitter is responsible to collect taxes and has a delegation of authority to perform that function?). Clerks never verify credentials of submitters or certification of the notice.

Filing of Recorded Notices of Federal Tax Lien

A lien notice is not a lien. The Clerk should file ONLY ACTUAL liens in the system of records reserved for liens. The Clerk should NOT file Notices in the Liens system. If the IRS does not like this, it can start creating paper liens, not invisible ones that it claims exist but really don’t. If it isn’t written, it isn’t true.

Statewide Grand Jury

IMO the clerk engages in racketeering with the IRS across multiple circuits throughout the state. Right now the Governor has empaneled (or will empanel) a Statewide Grand Jury. You should file an evidence package about this crime and demand SGJ investigation.

—————————————————————————————–

BobHurtSuit200707small <http://bobhurt.com/> Bob Hurt
2460 Persian Drive #70
Clearwater, FL 33763
+1 (727) 669-5511
Donate to my <http://bobhurt.com/lawdonation.htm> Law Scholarship fund
Learn civil litigation with <http://www.jurisdictionary.com/index.asp?refercode=HB0002> Jurisdictionary
Subscribe to <http://bobhurt.com/subscribetolawmen.htm> Lawmen Newsletter FREE
Download <http://groups.google.com/group/lawmen/files> Files FREE from the Lawmen <http://groups.google.com/group/lawmen> Archive
Improve your financial fortunes with <http://www.getzooks.biz/index.php?aff=bobhurt> GetZooks!
<http://www.fuelsaver-mpg.com/affiliates/jrox.php?id=145_1_tlid_8_MailFoot> Save Fuel

—————————————————————————————–

Topic: Tom Cryer sues Rebecca O’Dell for Defamation

“Bob Hurt” <bob@bobhurt.com> Dec 22 12:52PM -0500 ^

Tom Cryer has filed a lawsuit (see below press release) against Rebecca O’Dell for defaming him in comments she made to subscribers of the St. Pete area Constitution Party meetup group. When I saw her comments, seemingly timed to coincide with Tommy’s upcoming Tea Party Squared tour of 7 Florida cities, I felt shocked because 1) they did not constitute truth, and 2) they seemed so atypical of an attorney because of their libelous nature.

I forwarded them to Tommy. He wrote a correction to Rebecca and told her, effectively, that if she’d find laws making people liable, he’d let her off the hook. She published a partial-correction letter to her readers, but she otherwise spurned his mercy. So, he sued.

The lawsuit does not please me, but then neither have I felt pleased about Rebecca’s intransigent attitude about the implementation of income tax in America, nor her attack on Tommy. And, Tommy should protect his reputation.

She told me repeatedly that she did not like income tax, but that the courts say we all have to pay it, and we need to do that and take up the issue with Congress. I told her that the income tax as implemented violates Article I Section 2 Clause 3 and Section 9 Clause 4 of the US Constitution. She seemed to think that since the lower courts have ruled thousands of times in favor of the IRS , they must be right.

Rebecca wrote me, in effect, that if she believed me, stopped paying tax as a consequence, and the IRS attacked her and prevailed against her, she’d sue me for damages for misleading her. She seemed pretty hostile about all the anti-income-tax gurus causing so many people to lose fortunes to the IRS and losing liberty to the courts.

I guess that hostility spilled over onto Tom Cryer when I sent her his memorandum. She must have thought him one of the anti-income-tax gurus who tells people to stop filing and stop paying. But Tom has repeatedly explained, effectively, that such an action constitutes financial suicidal, and we can only prevail in that if many millions of Americans do it at the same time. Tom has said that we must work together on ALL FRONTS of activism, politically, socially, legally, and financially, to attack and defeat IRS abuses and the courts and politicians who support them.

For several years I have advocated out and out legal attacks against IRS agents who abuse individuals – find the IRS agent errors, then demand correction, and failing correction, sue them and file administrative and criminal complaints against them. If EVERYBODY did this, IRS abuses would stop. Unfortunately, most people take Rebecca’s position and cave in to them without a fight.

——————————————————————————————————

<http://bobhurt.com/> Bob Hurt • <http://bobhurt.com/subscribetolawmen.htm> Lawmen • <http://groups.google.com/group/lawmen/files> Files • <http://groups.google.com/group/lawmen> Archive • <http://bobhurt.com/lawdonation.htm> Scholarship • <http://www.jurisdictionary.com/index.asp?refercode=HB0002> Jurisdictionary • <http://www.getzooks.biz/index.php?aff=bobhurt> GetZooks!

——————————————————————————————————

From: Tom Cryer
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 1:48 AM
To: undisclosed-recipients:
Subject: Update

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

INTERNET DIATRIBE

LANDS FLORIDA EMAILER IN COURT

SHREVEPORT, LA—In a law suit filed by Louisiana attorney Tommy K. Cryer a Florida woman is being taken to task for distributing an email containing what Cryer’s suit alleges is a string of false and defamatory claims. According to the law suit filed in Shreveport, Louisiana, Rebecca O’Dell Townsend, a St. Petersburg, FL, attorney, published and distributed emails falsely accusing Cryer of being a disbarred tax evader who does not believe there is any such thing as a federal individual income tax.

Cryer, who has been in uninterrupted law practice in Louisiana for over 36 years and who was cleared of tax evasion and willful failure to file charges by a unanimous “not guilty” jury verdict, says “I have no idea what prompted Townsend to fabricate and publish the false statements. Call me old fashioned, but I don’t understand why some people feel compelled to lie.”

At the time Truth Attack (www.truthattack.org), a non-profit political action organization, which Cryer founded and heads up and whose stated mission is “putting the government back in its box—one tentacle at a time,” was in the process of promoting and conducting seminars for tea party and other political activists on what they called “The Lost Art of Citizenry”. The seminars offered instruction on how to organize and coordinate group activities, how to learn about our rights and government’s limitations, ways to distribute information to the public and inside information on how to influence representatives’ and government officials’ actions.

Barely a week before the seven seminars were to begin Townsend published and distributed a blistering mass emailing that was distributed widely across the internet, stating that Cryer was a disbarred tax evader who contended that there is no such thing as a federal individual income tax and that Cryer and those associated with him “have left a wake of destroyed families in their wake.” Cryer said “I am not nor have I ever been disbarred, I am not a tax evader and have never destroyed a family in my life, let alone a ‘wake of families’, whatever that means.”

Now Cryer has filed suit in Shreveport seeking damages for defamation. Cryer said “I don’t know this woman and have never heard of her before. I don’t know why she made up and published all these lies about me and my organization, but I will not sit idly by while someone attempts to destroy an unsullied reputation I have spent a lifetime in building.”

Source: Truth Attack

Contact: Jim Kerr, 318 795-2030

hq@truthattack.org

Interviews available on request

–
You received this because you have membership in the “Lawmen” Google Group.
Comment to group owner – reply to the message (only the owner posts messages).
See the archives, change options – visit http://groups.google.com/group/Lawmen
Join / Subscribe – send email to Lawmen+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Resign / Unsubscribe- send email to Lawmen+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299

telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Sharon4 Anderson – Google Profile Candidate AG2010 www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com Blogger: User Profile: Sharon Anderson

Homestead Act of 1862 Twitter / Sharon4Anderson Shar1058’s Buzz Activity Page – My Buzz Activity – Yahoo! Buzz neopopulism.org – Pro Se Dec Action Litigation Pack Sharon4Anderson | Scribd Document’s are based on SEC filings, Blogger: Dashboard Home |

SharonsYahoo! iGoogle

telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Sharon4 Anderson – Google Profile Candidate AG2010 www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com Blogger: User Profile: Sharon Anderson

SharonsYahoo! iGoogle

Legal Notice to the State of MN, Revenue,All Agencies, County of Ramsey,Mark.Oswald,Risk Management,Land Acquistion et al,City St.Paul,Mayor Coleman,DSI Bob Kessler,Joel Essling,Risk Management Ron.Guilfoile,HRA,Kathy Lantry,City Council enbanc,Shari.Moore Clerk,Marcia Moermond et al
East Side Review News alleged to be Tax Delinquent. 62cv09-1163

Interesting MN Court Administrator Sue Dosal Husband former MN Fed. Court Clerk

with “Tys” to Florida

re:



Today’s Topic Summary

Group: http://groups.google.com/group/lawmen/topics

Florida: Fraudulent Notices of Federal Tax Lien – a matter for the Statewide Grand Jury. [1 Update]

Tom Cryer sues Rebecca O’Dell for Defamation [1 Update]

Topic: Florida: Fraudulent Notices of Federal Tax Lien – a matter for the Statewide Grand Jury.

“Bob Hurt” <bob@bobhurt.com> Dec 22 07:22PM -0500 ^

Remedies for Fraudulent Notices of Federal Tax Lien in Florida

Florida Statutes <http://leg.state.fl.us/Statutes> provide possible remedies for fraudulent notices of tax lien.

28.222 requires the clerk to KNOW US LAW regarding federal tax liens and levies and to record federal tax liens ONLY if made in accordance with that law. The clerks don’t know anything about US law, and the county attorneys falsely inform them from IRS booklets made just to suborn clerks. You could point out that a lien notice has no validity unless a duly authorized assessment officer signed (under penalties of perjury) the assessment that forms the basis for the lien. I have NEVER seen such an assessment document signed under penalties of perjury that it is a bona fide and accurate assessment of taxes owed, due, and payable

713.31 – Remedies for fraud and collusion – worth looking at – treble damages.

713.901 (4) requires the certification of notices of liens (see IRS 7806 and 6065 and examine any lien notice for proper certification) by a “responsible” person (where’s the proof that the submitter is responsible to collect taxes and has a delegation of authority to perform that function?). Clerks never verify credentials of submitters or certification of the notice.

Filing of Recorded Notices of Federal Tax Lien

A lien notice is not a lien. The Clerk should file ONLY ACTUAL liens in the system of records reserved for liens. The Clerk should NOT file Notices in the Liens system. If the IRS does not like this, it can start creating paper liens, not invisible ones that it claims exist but really don’t. If it isn’t written, it isn’t true.

Statewide Grand Jury

IMO the clerk engages in racketeering with the IRS across multiple circuits throughout the state. Right now the Governor has empaneled (or will empanel) a Statewide Grand Jury. You should file an evidence package about this crime and demand SGJ investigation.

—————————————————————————————–

BobHurtSuit200707small <http://bobhurt.com/> Bob Hurt
2460 Persian Drive #70
Clearwater, FL 33763
+1 (727) 669-5511
Donate to my <http://bobhurt.com/lawdonation.htm> Law Scholarship fund
Learn civil litigation with <http://www.jurisdictionary.com/index.asp?refercode=HB0002> Jurisdictionary
Subscribe to <http://bobhurt.com/subscribetolawmen.htm> Lawmen Newsletter FREE
Download <http://groups.google.com/group/lawmen/files> Files FREE from the Lawmen <http://groups.google.com/group/lawmen> Archive
Improve your financial fortunes with <http://www.getzooks.biz/index.php?aff=bobhurt> GetZooks!
<http://www.fuelsaver-mpg.com/affiliates/jrox.php?id=145_1_tlid_8_MailFoot> Save Fuel

—————————————————————————————–

Topic: Tom Cryer sues Rebecca O’Dell for Defamation

“Bob Hurt” <bob@bobhurt.com> Dec 22 12:52PM -0500 ^

Tom Cryer has filed a lawsuit (see below press release) against Rebecca O’Dell for defaming him in comments she made to subscribers of the St. Pete area Constitution Party meetup group. When I saw her comments, seemingly timed to coincide with Tommy’s upcoming Tea Party Squared tour of 7 Florida cities, I felt shocked because 1) they did not constitute truth, and 2) they seemed so atypical of an attorney because of their libelous nature.

I forwarded them to Tommy. He wrote a correction to Rebecca and told her, effectively, that if she’d find laws making people liable, he’d let her off the hook. She published a partial-correction letter to her readers, but she otherwise spurned his mercy. So, he sued.

The lawsuit does not please me, but then neither have I felt pleased about Rebecca’s intransigent attitude about the implementation of income tax in America, nor her attack on Tommy. And, Tommy should protect his reputation.

She told me repeatedly that she did not like income tax, but that the courts say we all have to pay it, and we need to do that and take up the issue with Congress. I told her that the income tax as implemented violates Article I Section 2 Clause 3 and Section 9 Clause 4 of the US Constitution. She seemed to think that since the lower courts have ruled thousands of times in favor of the IRS , they must be right.

Rebecca wrote me, in effect, that if she believed me, stopped paying tax as a consequence, and the IRS attacked her and prevailed against her, she’d sue me for damages for misleading her. She seemed pretty hostile about all the anti-income-tax gurus causing so many people to lose fortunes to the IRS and losing liberty to the courts.

I guess that hostility spilled over onto Tom Cryer when I sent her his memorandum. She must have thought him one of the anti-income-tax gurus who tells people to stop filing and stop paying. But Tom has repeatedly explained, effectively, that such an action constitutes financial suicidal, and we can only prevail in that if many millions of Americans do it at the same time. Tom has said that we must work together on ALL FRONTS of activism, politically, socially, legally, and financially, to attack and defeat IRS abuses and the courts and politicians who support them.

For several years I have advocated out and out legal attacks against IRS agents who abuse individuals – find the IRS agent errors, then demand correction, and failing correction, sue them and file administrative and criminal complaints against them. If EVERYBODY did this, IRS abuses would stop. Unfortunately, most people take Rebecca’s position and cave in to them without a fight.

——————————————————————————————————

<http://bobhurt.com/> Bob Hurt • <http://bobhurt.com/subscribetolawmen.htm> Lawmen • <http://groups.google.com/group/lawmen/files> Files • <http://groups.google.com/group/lawmen> Archive • <http://bobhurt.com/lawdonation.htm> Scholarship • <http://www.jurisdictionary.com/index.asp?refercode=HB0002> Jurisdictionary • <http://www.getzooks.biz/index.php?aff=bobhurt> GetZooks!

——————————————————————————————————

From: Tom Cryer
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 1:48 AM
To: undisclosed-recipients:
Subject: Update

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

INTERNET DIATRIBE

LANDS FLORIDA EMAILER IN COURT

SHREVEPORT, LA—In a law suit filed by Louisiana attorney Tommy K. Cryer a Florida woman is being taken to task for distributing an email containing what Cryer’s suit alleges is a string of false and defamatory claims. According to the law suit filed in Shreveport, Louisiana, Rebecca O’Dell Townsend, a St. Petersburg, FL, attorney, published and distributed emails falsely accusing Cryer of being a disbarred tax evader who does not believe there is any such thing as a federal individual income tax.

Cryer, who has been in uninterrupted law practice in Louisiana for over 36 years and who was cleared of tax evasion and willful failure to file charges by a unanimous “not guilty” jury verdict, says “I have no idea what prompted Townsend to fabricate and publish the false statements. Call me old fashioned, but I don’t understand why some people feel compelled to lie.”

At the time Truth Attack (www.truthattack.org), a non-profit political action organization, which Cryer founded and heads up and whose stated mission is “putting the government back in its box—one tentacle at a time,” was in the process of promoting and conducting seminars for tea party and other political activists on what they called “The Lost Art of Citizenry”. The seminars offered instruction on how to organize and coordinate group activities, how to learn about our rights and government’s limitations, ways to distribute information to the public and inside information on how to influence representatives’ and government officials’ actions.

Barely a week before the seven seminars were to begin Townsend published and distributed a blistering mass emailing that was distributed widely across the internet, stating that Cryer was a disbarred tax evader who contended that there is no such thing as a federal individual income tax and that Cryer and those associated with him “have left a wake of destroyed families in their wake.” Cryer said “I am not nor have I ever been disbarred, I am not a tax evader and have never destroyed a family in my life, let alone a ‘wake of families’, whatever that means.”

Now Cryer has filed suit in Shreveport seeking damages for defamation. Cryer said “I don’t know this woman and have never heard of her before. I don’t know why she made up and published all these lies about me and my organization, but I will not sit idly by while someone attempts to destroy an unsullied reputation I have spent a lifetime in building.”

Source: Truth Attack

Contact: Jim Kerr, 318 795-2030

hq@truthattack.org

Interviews available on request

–
You received this because you have membership in the “Lawmen” Google Group.
Comment to group owner – reply to the message (only the owner posts messages).
See the archives, change options – visit http://groups.google.com/group/Lawmen
Join / Subscribe – send email to Lawmen+subscribe@googlegroups.com

  LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299

Legal Notice to the State of MN, Revenue,All Agencies, County of Ramsey,Mark.Oswald,Risk Management,Land Acquistion et al,City St.Paul,Mayor Coleman,DSI Bob Kessler,Joel Essling,Risk Management Ron.Guilfoile,HRA,Kathy Lantry,City Council enbanc,Shari.Moore Clerk,Marcia Moermond et al
East Side Review News alleged to be Tax Delinquent. 62cv09-1163

Interesting MN Court Administrator Sue Dosal Husband former MN Fed. Court Clerk

with “Tys” to Florida

re:Group: http://groups.google.com/group/lawmen/topics

Florida: Fraudulent Notices of Federal Tax Lien – a matter for the Statewide Grand Jury. [1 Update]

Tom Cryer sues Rebecca O’Dell for Defamation [1 Update]

Topic: Florida: Fraudulent Notices of Federal Tax Lien – a matter for the Statewide Grand Jury.

“Bob Hurt” <bob@bobhurt.com> Dec 22 07:22PM -0500 ^

Remedies for Fraudulent Notices of Federal Tax Lien in Florida

Florida Statutes <http://leg.state.fl.us/Statutes> provide possible remedies for fraudulent notices of tax lien.

28.222 requires the clerk to KNOW US LAW regarding federal tax liens and levies and to record federal tax liens ONLY if made in accordance with that law. The clerks don’t know anything about US law, and the county attorneys falsely inform them from IRS booklets made just to suborn clerks. You could point out that a lien notice has no validity unless a duly authorized assessment officer signed (under penalties of perjury) the assessment that forms the basis for the lien. I have NEVER seen such an assessment document signed under penalties of perjury that it is a bona fide and accurate assessment of taxes owed, due, and payable

713.31 – Remedies for fraud and collusion – worth looking at – treble damages.

713.901 (4) requires the certification of notices of liens (see IRS 7806 and 6065 and examine any lien notice for proper certification) by a “responsible” person (where’s the proof that the submitter is responsible to collect taxes and has a delegation of authority to perform that function?). Clerks never verify credentials of submitters or certification of the notice.

Filing of Recorded Notices of Federal Tax Lien

A lien notice is not a lien. The Clerk should file ONLY ACTUAL liens in the system of records reserved for liens. The Clerk should NOT file Notices in the Liens system. If the IRS does not like this, it can start creating paper liens, not invisible ones that it claims exist but really don’t. If it isn’t written, it isn’t true.

Statewide Grand Jury

IMO the clerk engages in racketeering with the IRS across multiple circuits throughout the state. Right now the Governor has empaneled (or will empanel) a Statewide Grand Jury. You should file an evidence package about this crime and demand SGJ investigation.

—————————————————————————————–

BobHurtSuit200707small <http://bobhurt.com/> Bob Hurt
2460 Persian Drive #70
Clearwater, FL 33763
+1 (727) 669-5511
Donate to my <http://bobhurt.com/lawdonation.htm> Law Scholarship fund
Learn civil litigation with <http://www.jurisdictionary.com/index.asp?refercode=HB0002> Jurisdictionary
Subscribe to <http://bobhurt.com/subscribetolawmen.htm> Lawmen Newsletter FREE
Download <http://groups.google.com/group/lawmen/files> Files FREE from the Lawmen <http://groups.google.com/group/lawmen> Archive
Improve your financial fortunes with <http://www.getzooks.biz/index.php?aff=bobhurt> GetZooks!
<http://www.fuelsaver-mpg.com/affiliates/jrox.php?id=145_1_tlid_8_MailFoot> Save Fuel

—————————————————————————————–

Topic: Tom Cryer sues Rebecca O’Dell for Defamation

“Bob Hurt” <bob@bobhurt.com> Dec 22 12:52PM -0500 ^

Tom Cryer has filed a lawsuit (see below press release) against Rebecca O’Dell for defaming him in comments she made to subscribers of the St. Pete area Constitution Party meetup group. When I saw her comments, seemingly timed to coincide with Tommy’s upcoming Tea Party Squared tour of 7 Florida cities, I felt shocked because 1) they did not constitute truth, and 2) they seemed so atypical of an attorney because of their libelous nature.

I forwarded them to Tommy. He wrote a correction to Rebecca and told her, effectively, that if she’d find laws making people liable, he’d let her off the hook. She published a partial-correction letter to her readers, but she otherwise spurned his mercy. So, he sued.

The lawsuit does not please me, but then neither have I felt pleased about Rebecca’s intransigent attitude about the implementation of income tax in America, nor her attack on Tommy. And, Tommy should protect his reputation.

She told me repeatedly that she did not like income tax, but that the courts say we all have to pay it, and we need to do that and take up the issue with Congress. I told her that the income tax as implemented violates Article I Section 2 Clause 3 and Section 9 Clause 4 of the US Constitution. She seemed to think that since the lower courts have ruled thousands of times in favor of the IRS , they must be right.

Rebecca wrote me, in effect, that if she believed me, stopped paying tax as a consequence, and the IRS attacked her and prevailed against her, she’d sue me for damages for misleading her. She seemed pretty hostile about all the anti-income-tax gurus causing so many people to lose fortunes to the IRS and losing liberty to the courts.

I guess that hostility spilled over onto Tom Cryer when I sent her his memorandum. She must have thought him one of the anti-income-tax gurus who tells people to stop filing and stop paying. But Tom has repeatedly explained, effectively, that such an action constitutes financial suicidal, and we can only prevail in that if many millions of Americans do it at the same time. Tom has said that we must work together on ALL FRONTS of activism, politically, socially, legally, and financially, to attack and defeat IRS abuses and the courts and politicians who support them.

For several years I have advocated out and out legal attacks against IRS agents who abuse individuals – find the IRS agent errors, then demand correction, and failing correction, sue them and file administrative and criminal complaints against them. If EVERYBODY did this, IRS abuses would stop. Unfortunately, most people take Rebecca’s position and cave in to them without a fight.

——————————————————————————————————

<http://bobhurt.com/> Bob Hurt • <http://bobhurt.com/subscribetolawmen.htm> Lawmen • <http://groups.google.com/group/lawmen/files> Files • <http://groups.google.com/group/lawmen> Archive • <http://bobhurt.com/lawdonation.htm> Scholarship • <http://www.jurisdictionary.com/index.asp?refercode=HB0002> Jurisdictionary • <http://www.getzooks.biz/index.php?aff=bobhurt> GetZooks!

——————————————————————————————————

From: Tom Cryer
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 1:48 AM
To: undisclosed-recipients:
Subject: Update

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

INTERNET DIATRIBE

LANDS FLORIDA EMAILER IN COURT

SHREVEPORT, LA—In a law suit filed by Louisiana attorney Tommy K. Cryer a Florida woman is being taken to task for distributing an email containing what Cryer’s suit alleges is a string of false and defamatory claims. According to the law suit filed in Shreveport, Louisiana, Rebecca O’Dell Townsend, a St. Petersburg, FL, attorney, published and distributed emails falsely accusing Cryer of being a disbarred tax evader who does not believe there is any such thing as a federal individual income tax.

Cryer, who has been in uninterrupted law practice in Louisiana for over 36 years and who was cleared of tax evasion and willful failure to file charges by a unanimous “not guilty” jury verdict, says “I have no idea what prompted Townsend to fabricate and publish the false statements. Call me old fashioned, but I don’t understand why some people feel compelled to lie.”

At the time Truth Attack (www.truthattack.org), a non-profit political action organization, which Cryer founded and heads up and whose stated mission is “putting the government back in its box—one tentacle at a time,” was in the process of promoting and conducting seminars for tea party and other political activists on what they called “The Lost Art of Citizenry”. The seminars offered instruction on how to organize and coordinate group activities, how to learn about our rights and government’s limitations, ways to distribute information to the public and inside information on how to influence representatives’ and government officials’ actions.

Barely a week before the seven seminars were to begin Townsend published and distributed a blistering mass emailing that was distributed widely across the internet, stating that Cryer was a disbarred tax evader who contended that there is no such thing as a federal individual income tax and that Cryer and those associated with him “have left a wake of destroyed families in their wake.” Cryer said “I am not nor have I ever been disbarred, I am not a tax evader and have never destroyed a family in my life, let alone a ‘wake of families’, whatever that means.”

Now Cryer has filed suit in Shreveport seeking damages for defamation. Cryer said “I don’t know this woman and have never heard of her before. I don’t know why she made up and published all these lies about me and my organization, but I will not sit idly by while someone attempts to destroy an unsullied reputation I have spent a lifetime in building.”

Source: Truth Attack

Contact: Jim Kerr, 318 795-2030

hq@truthattack.org

Interviews available on request

–
You received this because you have membership in the “Lawmen” Google Group.
Comment to group owner – reply to the message (only the owner posts messages).
See the archives, change options – visit http://groups.google.com/group/Lawmen
Join / Subscribe – send email to Lawmen+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Resign / Unsubscribe- send email to Lawmen+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Sharon4 Anderson – Google Profile Candidate AG2010 www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com Blogger: User Profile: Sharon Anderson

Homestead Act of 1862 Twitter / Sharon4Anderson Shar1058’s Buzz Activity Page – My Buzz Activity – Yahoo! Buzz neopopulism.org – Pro Se Dec Action Litigation Pack Sharon4Anderson | Scribd Document’s are based on SEC filings, Blogger: Dashboard Home |

SharonsYahoo! iGoogle

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »

Older Posts »

Sharon4anderson’s Weblog

Just another WordPress.com weblog

Sharon4AndersonA09-2031 MN

MaryJaneDuchene v. WSt.Paul KoriLane RemFC

State of Minnesota District Court County of Dakota First Judicial …

MN Judge Edward Toussaint A09-2031

Sharons A09-2031_Rehear Enbanc(Toussaint)

Court of Appeals

Eminent Domain(MN) 19CX-07-030126(Mayer) A08-767

Eminent Domain A08-767 Eagan Dev.v.U Haul

Tim Kinley 62F196163(Cleary)

Gearins Unallotment “Files”62cv09-11693_62cv09-1163(Vandenorth)

2009 Unallotment Litigation:

62-CV-09-11693:
Multiple Parties v. Governor of MN, et al

Documents

Sharons Informal Brief re: FIAFEA_FIRREA_A09-2031

Sharons QuoWarranto v. MN Judge Edward Toussaint A09-2031

Archives

Categories

Pages

Blogroll

Meta

Just another WordPress.com weblog

Court of Appeals

2009 Unallotment Litigation:

62-CV-09-11693: Multiple Parties v. Governor of MN, et al

Documents

Archives

Categories

Pages

Blogroll

Meta

62-CV-09-11693:
Multiple Parties v. Governor of MN, et al